COVID Effectively Eradicated In Population of 241 Million, Only 16% Jabbed, Big Media Silent [VIDEO]

This could be considered the biggest medical miracle nobody knows about.

BY 

The COVID Cult has spread COVID fear and hysteria for over a year, and you would think that if there were a massive success against the coronavirus, it would at least get some attention, right?

Well, in the Indian province of Uttar Pradesh, they had what some would call a medical miracle.

This massive success got very little coverage. Ask yourself why. Connect the dots. Follow the money.

WATCH:

<
>
“And then that what I call the miracle of Uttar Pradesh, which is, which is the world’s quietest miracle in history. I think this is a public health achievement that should go down in history and maybe someday will when we write the history books correctly, but they literally had an aggressive Public Health Initiative which wasn’t just Ivermectin because they used a 70,000 plus health care workers, all taking Ivermectin prophylactically traveled throughout the state of Uttar Pradesh.

Two hundred forty-one million people, 97,000 villages. Everybody tested positive was treated with Ivermectin, the household members were given Ivermectin to prevent spread, and all of the health care workers on Ivermectin. And by doing that, over the many months after that surge in May, they found that in September, they started to report they’d effectively eradicated disease. That in their last two 2.5 million tests, they had 201 positive. Which has a positivity rate of 0.004, which is effectively zero. They had 67 out of 75 districts without an active case. That’s while doing two and a half million tests. That would be like me standing up today saying that in 40 out of 50 states in the United States, we don’t have one active case. That is how remarkable that achievement is.

Guess where, how this was covered? Again, choice A: Fauci came on, did a big interview with New York Times, and applauded the incredible efforts and successes of the Uttar Pradesh health ministry. That didn’t happen. Okay. Thought that was, maybe that was a dream. Sorry. I got a little confused there. Yeah, none of that happened. It wasn’t even covered. Right. And here’s the absurdity, it was actually covered by two major newspapers in India. One was the Hindustan Times. The other one was India Today. Long article talking about what they achieved. What word did not appear in either article? Ivermectin, so it’s not a joke. I mean, this is like, I have to have to watch this stuff every day.” – Dr. Pierre Kory

December 20, 2021 | 6 Comments »

Leave a Reply

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. @riverfred123

    If ivermectin was so successful in preventing the virus, why is it not being used throughout India?

    Excellent question. The world greatly benefited from the fact that the IVM treatment was not pursued in all of India because it demonstrated that the hotspots would remain hot despite their vaccine rate(20%) being higher than in other Indian states, such as Uttar Predesh(5%), where the IVM pill packs were employed. It also demonstrated that it was not a genetic benefit among the Indian people. This benefit to the world, however, was not very helpful to those people caught in the Indian states where the vaccine policy was adopted.

    The answer to your very perceptive question is that policy is determined by the Indian State govts. They do have a central medical organization, but fortunately it does not have authority over the states use medical practices.

    For any who are not familiar with the situation leading to zero cases, zero deaths in India, it is quite a tale. The Indian Govt issued an order to include IVM and Budesimide in a multi-vitamine treatment pack on ~April 22. There was some initial confusion and they re-issued the order on April 29. The positive case count, which had been sent into an exponential spread, peaked on May 2. Following this, the positive case numbers plummeted thru May at a rate never seen on a large nation-wide basis before. You can compare the chart above and any other chart displaying the case count drop after a peak is met – it is usually slowly receding or very slowly receding by comparison to the chart above. After six weeks the cases were reduced by 95% following the treatment pack policy.

    In spite of this massive success, the WHO called on India to stop their use of IVM for two years while a proper drug study could demonstrate that the drug was actually safe. In spite of the massive results of IVM being employed throughout much of India, the Indian medical authority issued the statement requested by the WHO. The Indian states did not respond to the call to stop their use of IVM and so everything worked out in the states that were using IVM. Some Indian states such as Kerakala pursued the model proposed by the US and endorsed by the WHO, with vaccination rather than treatment packs. Despite Kerakala having only 3% of India’s population, by August 27 they were responsible for 68% of new daily cases in all of India.

    In a conversation between the Health minister of India and that of Indonesia, the Indian minister stated that patients were no longer spreading disease 24hrs after IVM treatment. In truth, I am not sure if this is accurate or not, but this would explain why, in just a couple of days, Uttar Predesh was able to reach their case peak and plummet case numbers from ~35K/day to a few hundred/day in one months time. A similar result was found to occur in Indonesia with the use of IVM as well.

    Japan experienced a similar massive drop in cases following the decision to endorse its use in Japan. IVM was always available in Japan, but it was not greenlit as being useful for Covid. Following contamination in millions of viles of of Moderna vaccines due to poor manufacturing practices(big story to be told on this), and the vaccines not preventing a massive spike in cases, the head of the Tokyo Metro Medical Assn greenlighted the use of IVM as having a significant beneficial effect. Cases dropped about two weeks later and the last death reported was on Dec. 1.

    There really needs to be a very good explanation as to why countries such as the US, UK and Israel are not allowing this drug to be used, as well as to why this drug is not a mainstay of treatment, or even permitted in the most serious of cases.

  2. Ancient Greek drug could cut COVID-19 deaths – Israeli scientist
    Prof. Ami Schattner: “Initial results are promising to say the least.”

    An ancient Greek drug derived from the saffron plant could improve the treatment of people with severe COVID-19 and reduce the COVID mortality rate by as much as 50%, according to a report published earlier this month in the European Journal of Internal Medicine by an Israeli researcher from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Hadassah Medical School.
    The drug, colchicine, dates back thousands of years to ancient Egypt, where it was known for its special healing properties. It is one of a few medicines that survived until modern times. Most recently, it has been used to treat and prevent inflammation caused by gout that can lead to painful arthritis and Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), which is common among Jewish people of North African descent.

    Full article at https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/ancient-greek-drug-could-save-lives-of-covid-patients-israeli-scientist-688730?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=Ancient+Greek+drug+could+save+live+of+COVID+patients&utm_campaign=H+W+12%2F20+Newsletter

  3. “Out of 2.5million tests there were 201 positive tests which is a positivity rate of 0.004%”

    This is undeniably a remarkable feat.

    Very important developments in India, as always. Yet, the treatment masked as a vaccine has failed to even approach the merits of this very simple, though enormous, undertaking of providing the public with a safe and effective treatment plan. In truth, the vaccines have to be proven as safe and they have to be proven as effective. Presuming this was done, though it wasn’t, a properly tested, vetted and operating vaccine would provide no reason why those who become ill, either with or without vaccination, should be denied a valid, effective and harmless treatment. This is more barbaric than senseless. And it is very very senseless.