Lindell: SCOTUS Lawsuit! State AG’s Are Suing To Reinstate Trump!

The Pete Santilli interview of Dr. Frank starts at 3:30 minutes.
Frank explains the entire lawsuit to be presented to SCOTUS on Nov 23/21.

November 17, 2021 | 6 Comments »

Leave a Reply

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. Patrick Byrne connecting the dots and putting it all together on the eve of the Lindell lawsuits tomorrow.
    https://rumble.com/vpi1pt-patrick-byrne-connecting-the-dots-and-putting-it-all-together.html

    “We’ll be on our toes and in the fight on Nov. 23”
    This seems to be the closing arguments in Byrne’s campaign to convince the public to pursue, recognize, and overhaul the fraud in the election of 2020. In it, he builds his case describing the psyop on which the fraud was based and briefly describing the general outline upon which things were suppose to have progressed. Following this, he notes that “We’ve got them, we’ve got them…This was suppose to be over in April and it wasn’t…and now we’ve got them.” In his closing moments he goes on to reveal a punchline that will be striking to any who have not seen his many dozens of commentaries and interviews over the past year. He alludes to the comparison between the current situation and the age of Athens and the Thirty Tyrants, but doesn’t dwell upon the comparison. But he goes on to note that the fraud was the result of a clash of world views – namely, a constitutional republic vs the rule by an elitist few. He notes that it would be a mistake to assume that China is behind the fraud or rather that China is behind it uniquely. Instead, he suggests that there are elements of US power structure who were never in support of the constitutional republic concept and that this was their moment. He notes that it included the lefties, and the hard left, who believe in decisions being made by a few elites. He continues by noting that the elites in general are also in support of this power grab and also include the Silicon Valley Crypto-fascists, and of course, the CCP, whose entire power structure is based around the concept of the rule by the few. In anticipation of tomorrow, this video’s release was nicely timed.

  2. From Tierney News on telegram:
    On the election fraud front, Internal emails from election officials in Green Bay, Wisconsin revealed Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative, served as a “de facto elections administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the election.” RIGGED.

    The Wisconsin Election Commission ALSO admitted it told election officials to break the law before and after the 2020 election and now a Wisconsin Senator is calling for the election to be decertified.

    In Pennsylvania, an election whistleblower in Delaware County, Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) released video evidence of the destruction of election data, documents, and equipment by election officials in the 2020 presidential election.

    The videos show election officials admitting to each other that their actions were illegal, even “a felony.” But the officials decided to destroy the election evidence anyway.

    In one video James Allen, the Director of Elections Operations is seen in a backroom telling officials to destroy evidence knowing it was a felony.

    in another video, Tom Gallager, a lawyer for Delaware County, is seen destroying election tapes — a felony.

    Last night a lawsuit was filed against county election officials and former Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar which states the Delaware county flipped the vote for Biden to win Pennsylvania!

    “Defendants intentionally and fraudulently conspired to destroy, delete, secrete, and hide November 3, 2020, election data, materials, and equipment to prevent discovery of election fraud and election law violations in Delaware County, which the Defendants also conspired to commit and did commit while carrying out the November 3, 2020, election…

    It appears Delaware County was the last county to submit its presidential vote total in the state potentially changing November 3, 2020 election results in numerous races.

    It appears prior to Delaware County submitting its vote totals, Donald J. Trump was leading Joseph Biden by 7,515 votes. Delaware County submitted [its] presidential votes total with a difference of 88,070 between the two presidential candidates.”

    Also, the Democrats are now wanting recounts in close Virginia House races after the vote has been certified and gave Republicans control. Oh, I guess there’s voter fraud when they lose but not when they win?

    In addition, the DOJ announced a Federal indictment of two Iranian hackers into the 2020 election – which further erodes the fake narrative that it was perfect. This is foreign interference in our election – which Lindell has said all along.

    So first, new evidence comes out in Michigan & Wisconsin. Then whistleblowers come out in Pennsylvania. Then the FBI says we had foreign interference in our election. Then Trump gives an interview to Lindell & mentions them all and next week Lindell files before the Supreme Court. Trump did say we’d have a very nice Thanksgiving. And an even better Christmas.

  4. The Supreme Court will not take this case in my opinion and yes they will site at least partially the concept of “standing”. Ken Paxton, AG of Texas went to the USSC right after the election on sued on behalf of Texas against PA and GA (if memory serves) and they rejected his suit (incorrectly in my reading of the matter), due to “standing”. This is a pipe dream. Roberts will do anything he can to make sure this suit never sees the light of day. JMO

  5. Supreme Court can not reinstate Trump.

    Biden will serve out his term unless he dies or is removed by the 25th Amendment. The Dems will not impeach him.

    So posting ridiculous things like this serves nothing of a constructive to nature to be polite.

  6. My Mac Air computer refused to play this video from this site. But I was able to hear it on phaser.com.

    I think it is just a fantasy that the Supreme Court will reinstate Trump. Extremely unlikely that they will even hear Mike Lindell’s case. As for Mike’s alleged comment (according to Dr. Frank) that if the Supreme Court refuses to hear the case, then everyone will know that the court is corrupt, that is also a fantasy. Many people believe that the entire court system is corrupt, and don’t need to know that the court has rejected this particular case to believe this. As to those who have confidence in the courts, the court’s refusal to hear Lindell’s petition won’t change their mind.

    Most of the public will never even know that this lawsuit has been filed. If they do know, they will not consider it to be a matter of any consequence. Only a small group of loyal “Ever-Trumpers” will take note of the court’s refusal to hear the case, and they have already made up their minds that the election was rigged, and their views will not be influenced by the court’s decision one way or another.

    This much said, I also need to add that I do share Lindell’s belief that the election was rigged. My only disagreement with him is that I don’t think the official result can be changed two years after the fact.

    On the other hand, if Trump runs again in 2024, and is in good health health, he may well win–unless the Democrats have contrived to rig the election a second time.