Sept 2 2021 Molecular Biologist speaks at Dawson Creek City Council meeting
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Menu There is no diplomatic solutionIsrael should declare three nos;
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
no to nuclear Iran, no to two-state solution, no to bi-national state
@peloni1986 Thank you! You are exactly right.
So people can listen to Gina and gain a sense of her earnest concern, or they can listen to Dr. McCullough and gain a sense of his earnest outrage, or they can listen to Dr. Hope and gain a sense of the benefit of early treatments. Likewise, they can listen to the CDC, the FDA, the Q&A on Harvard Medical University or that at John Hopkins where they can gain a sense of the inconsistencies and outright lies in which data is purposefully distorted and broken tests have been, and continue to be, used with out any basis of validity. You shouldn’t be swayed by anything more stirring than your own sense of judgement that went someone is lying to you, they have an agenda which they are hiding. This must be obvious to all, regardless where you stand on these matters. Ask yourself, why would they lie?
Gina, and McCullough and Hope, etc have no lies to answer for. Their concerns, their outrage and their logical call for treatment are unfolded, unmasked and undisguised and well documented as being nothing other than what it is. They share the basis of their concerns, the basis of their outrage and the basis of the treatments while the only response by the authoritative powers are ridicule, sanctions and dictates. Meanwhile, the authoritative powers of the Western Democracies have taken on a standard of force. Forced mandates of unhelpful policies. Forced inoculations of unsafe biologicals. Forced quarantines of healthy people.
Step away from the fearmongering and honestly ask yourself, why would you trust the govt not to lie to you when they have, and as they continue to do. They hold all the data. The have blighted any useful meaning of it by using nonspecific testing when adequate testing was always available. They also have changed the meaning of a placebo group to include anyone who might carry a side effect of their testing upto 1 month after their first injection, and thereby eliminate any possibility of their studies displaying harm. Why would they do this? How could anyone trust them after knowing they have done this?