T. Belman. The only reason for the restrictions on free speech or the cancel culture or the mob enforcers is because it suits the interests of those that want to transform America. They know their ideas can’t win in the market place of ideas and must be rammed down our throats. The only reason they are able to do this is because they are aided and abetted by so many in the bureaucracy, academia, big business and big tech. Heaven help us.
America is following the path of the USSR and the CCP. There is no difference. American no longer holds the moral highground and lost its right to preach to anyone.
Dorian Abbot, an associate professor of geophysics from the University of Chicago, was scheduled deliver the prestigious Carlson Lecture at MIT on climate and the potential for life on other planets
Everything seemed in order until an insane mob began banging at the door.
The mob had discovered a Newsweek piece that Abbot co-wrote back in August where he argued that diversity efforts at universities violated equal treatment. The article proposed that “university applicants be treated as individuals and evaluated through a rigorous and unbiased process based on their merit and qualifications alone.”
Previously Abbot has also posted videos on YouTube denouncing the rioting in Chicago that erupted following the killing of George Floyd.
Decades ago, condemning riots and asking for merit-based enrolment at educational institutes was so obvious that there was no need to state it in plain words.
But those days are over.
For the anti-riot videos, Abbot was targeted for cancellation by a group of graduate students at his University. However, the President of University of Chicago issued a strong statement in support of faculty free expression which emphatically resolved the matter.
The mob emerged again in another form, upon learning of Abbot’s scheduled Carlson Lecture at MIT. This MIT Twitter mob, comprising of students, post-doctorates, and alumni, vehemently demanded that Abbot be uninvited because they disagreed with the contents of his Newsweek article.
This time it worked.
MIT cancelled Abbot’s Carlson lecture to ‘avoid controversy.’
This isn’t the first time that a prestigious university yielded under pressure and it will not be the last if remedial immediate actions are not taken.
One wonders what could have been accomplished if the innovation and drive that is shown towards cancelling people were to be applied towards something meaningful.
Not so long ago, this may have seemed like stating the obvious, but owing to this climate of insanity it essential to reiterate basic principles regarding education.
It is an axiomatic fact that to be effective places of education, colleges and universities have no option but to be a forum where absolute freedom of expression is allowed.
This includes the right to opine and criticise without repercussions. It also includes the right to offend, to insult, to satirize, to express hateful and obscene ideas and to ridicule anything under the sun including the state, religion, public figures, the news media, the Almighty and above all their teachers.
What is hateful to one may be compelling to another. What is prejudiced to one may be a fresh perspective to another. What is disgusting to one can be riveting to another. What is pornographic to one may be artful to another. What is crass to one may be hilarious to another. What is crude to one may be hard hitting to another.
A bigot to one may be a maverick to another. A liberal to one can be a fascist to another. A rabid ‘right-winger’ to one is a voice of reason to another. A ‘left-wing’ loon to one may be the sole voice of hope to another. We cannot allow personal taste to dictate what is permitted in any forum of ideas.
An educational institute must be A place where students are exposed to a variety of ideas and perspectives. The exposure should result in them being eager to learn about contrarian perspectives. The forum should enable one to vehemently disagree without being disagreeable and engage in healthy debates.
It the healthy exchange and debates, not echo chambers, that facilitates growth as students learn to understand and even empathize with the opposing point of view. Denying an individual his right to free expression is denying yourself the right to be exposed to it.
Freedom of expression emanates from freedom of thought and it is often these thoughts that have led to great works of art and literature, inventions and discoveries.
If an individual had not dared to be different, and more importantly dared to express this difference of opinion without fear, we would probably be living in the stone age.
Quite often a solitary contrarian voice that begins like a flickering flame, but with support it results in illuminating everybody. If a society that sticks to convention it ceases to grow.
The is the only way to train students to think freely and make informed decisions is to expose them to every possible thought. Any decision that is taken with incomplete information is usually the wrong decision. This evolution of the mind upon being exposed to new ideas is the core of education.
In Abbot’s case, the students could have organized a debate or a discussion forum where they could have engaged and even disagreed with his ideas
But we must not blame the students; they are young, impressionable and uninformed; they are allowed to be petulant and vacuous. It is the adults in the room who should be taking charge of the situation and standing up for freedom.
But often the adults are either too scared themselves since they want to hold on to their job or they just don’t want to be bothered with what they consider as gratuitous disputes.
Hence they bow before the mob, forgetting that every inch of their surrender of freedoms is an inch closer to totalitarianism. Wokeism which ‘cancels’ individuals for daring to express ideas that do not adhere to the groupthink is merely a euphemism for totalitarianism.
Someday the mob will turn on their appeasers because no individual, irrespective of how cautiously restrained they are, cannot always hold the mob-approved thoughts.
The mob always claims to be standing against fascism; perhaps they fail to see the irony that it was fascists who suppressed opposing views and Nazis that burned books that they considered dissenting.
Quite often the propagandists masquerading as teachers are leaders and organizers of the mob. They pride themselves on their sway over students such that they are able to incite credulous young minds.
This is because the perpetually insecure propagandists live in fear that the contrarian ideas may be persuasive to students and soon their influence will melt into thin air. Hence instead of engaging, they shut down their opponents.
It is not just universities and colleges; the abhorrent wokeism seems to be infiltrating schools. Indoctrination at a very young age is often irreversible, parents have understandably reacted by expressing grave concern and anger.
Recently it was announced that the FBI would investigate “a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, board members, teachers, and staff.”
Many have seen this as another pretext to shut down critics of the undesirable occurrences within educational institutes. The mob isn’t just a group of unruly students and rogue teachers, they are being shielded by the powers that be.
A senior professor at the at a college I once lectured at told me that “If you want to destroy a nation, you first destroy its foundation, that is the education system”
Silence is no longer an option.
It is time for the responsible adults within and beyond the education system to take charge again to save your education and your nation before it is too late.
All those Blogger links are edit links, not post links, and need to be fixed.
The American left/elito-kleptocracy is pushing for a massive confrontation, possibly violent, against the rest of the country. The “summer of love” was only an appetizer!
The author says that silence is no longer an option and that adults must take charge. Fine words, but what specifically should the adults do?
No one who has read Stephen Norwood’s ‘The Third Reich in the Ivory Tower’ is surprised by the attitude taken of the university administrators. Back in the 1930’s, the ivy league universities supported Hitler; now they continue the same tradition only wearing mustaches has gone out of fashion.
The main problem is that anyone who fights back despite the existence of the second ammendment will be hauled in by the police and jailed no matter what the circumstances were, Rogue DAs will ensure this. A good example was that lawyer and his wife who brandished (but didn’t fire) their guns in an attempt to resist a nasty mob.
So the “adults” must take into account that if they fight back effectively, they may end up in jail. If I were the “authorities” I would start building more jails; lots of them.