By Alison Ruthless, AM THINKER
As the ravages of the COVID narrative continue to wreak damage, there remains a not insignificant swath of brave health care workers, from physicians to CNAs to administrative workers, who quietly but persistently question. Contrary to much of today’s culture, when they are not being censored by Big Tech, they dare to ask for more information regarding the current unrelenting fear-mongering put out by so many among the American media and government officials. They are often not the loud, abrasive virtue-signalers prevalent today; they are more likely to speak in whispers and furtive glances, afraid of who may be listening. They are not looking for glory or recognition. Often, they just want to continue to do their business of taking care of others without fear of harassment, discrimination, forced vaccine compliance, and possibly termination should they fail to do as they are told.
Yet that all too often cannot be allowed. The message is clear these days from the higher-ups in health care. Dissenters must be made to pay the price one way or another as pressure builds. Get the vaccine. Everything will get back to normal if you just do what you are told. You could keep your job, you could prove to others that you are a good little soldier by offering your body as a guinea pig for an unproven, largely untested, and very new “vaccine.” Long-term consequences be damned.
If you are one of the few souls brave enough to be different, not to promptly fall into line, you can bet that your future is becoming increasingly uncertain and not at all promising. The fact is, many employers continue to gather data and collect names on those who have and who have not gotten the big V, and they are often doing it not for harmless data-gathering purposes. Usually, it is the first sign that you will be given an eventual choice: comply or face termination. There is story after story after story of this very thing happening. And at a time when we can little afford to lose a single competent health care worker.
The fact of the matter is that we face risks every day. Not one rational person experienced in the medical field would deny that COVID is real and that it can be a significant risk for some individuals in our population. Where the disagreement arises is in being forced to hand over our bodies to a new vaccine for a virus that has roughly the same fatality rate as the flu (if current numbers can even be believed, with financial incentives being what they are for health care facilities who have COVID-positive patients). The aggression and the manipulation tactics being brought to bear on people are alarming and disturbing. Yet we are not supposed to ask questions, not supposed to doubt. It does not matter if the masks, the shutdowns, and anything else makes sense. It is not science; it is compliance.
I have worked day after day in a field desperately understaffed, forced to listen while my colleagues (people I have laughed with, cried with, sacrificed for) say despicable things about those individuals who even hesitate to get the vaccine. Among the choice accusations they routinely trot out is that health and other reasons to remain unvaccinated do not matter; not falling into line proves that these people do not care about others, that they are clearly bad parents, and that they should not be allowed to receive health care. Even musings about these people deserving to die for not being vaccinated are not unheard of in today’s fear-driven climate. Far from being alarmed that there are individuals who demur at rushing into being jabbed, people should be appalled that fellow Americans have become this unthinking, this willing to punish and become viciously vindictive toward those wanting more autonomy in making their own health care choices.
The virus of fear, the lack of critical thinking, and the rush to comply (and wanting to force others to do the same) is worse than that of the very real COVID. Only there appears very little demand to halt its rampant spread.
Alison Ruthless is a pseudonym.
@Adam
Just FYI, these are both oral steroids. It is very important that the ‘or’ be recognized and a choice be made between them(prednisone has been reported with better efficacy, but many are using Dexamethasone since it was the first steroid suggested and tested by Dr. Kory last year, but only choose one of them). Lots of problems associated with over medicating with steroids especially if their is any secondary infection present.
Regarding the low vs high risk treatments, the high risk treatments are intended to keep the virus from having any option of causing illness as the high risk patients are quite fragile. The low risk patients are much more healthy and should be able to fight of the disease with ease given the support of the basic nutrients. There are, however, concerning markers about this disease that I would suggest anyone who could avoid the battles of this disease would be in an improved position of health in the future. There is no downside to the low risk patients taking the high risk treatments and both will result in a full, robust immunity to every part of the virus. But given what we know, and what we don’t know about this virus, it is best to be as vigilant as possible in preventing this disease entirely. As usual, I would suggest Zelenko’s prophylaxis cocktail (details at https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/prophylaxis-protocol/) if you can find a doctor to prescribe it and a pharmacist to dispense it.
To find a qualified physician who will treat you, you can visit:
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/treatments/how-do-i-get-covid-19-medication/
or
https://c19protocols.com/physicians-facilities-offering-early-treatment/
or
https://myfreedoctor.com/
The name of the talk show host who interviewed the anonymous nurse is Stew Peters. I think his interviews are still available on several websites.
This is the web address of the one Dr. Zelenko site that is still operational when I last looked:
https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/
The interview with the anonymous nurse on theconservativetreehouse.com with Stew (forget his last name) is incredibly shocking. Also the written summary of it on the web site is equally shocking. Totally confirms what my friend from shul told me that three nurses had told him.
Below is from Dr. Zelenko’s site, which is almost impossible to google. Stew gave a web address for it that Google says has been “removed,” presumably for “providing misinformation.” Numerous other sites that show interviews with Dr. Zelenko have also been removed, according to Google.
Below is the complete “Zelenko protocol” for what meds to take if you get cover-like symptoms, from his one remaining site, which cannot be found on Google except indirectly through a link to a few other sites that have not been removed:
logo
HOME
ZELENKO PROTOCOL
COVID 19 STUDIES
ZSTACK
MORE
schedule
banner
Covid-19 Treatment Protocol
Home » Treatment Protocol
Download Protocol
Fundamental Principles
Treat patients based on clinical suspicion as soon as possible, preferably within the first 5 days of symptoms. Perform PCR testing, but do not withhold treatment pending results.
Risk Stratify Patients
Low risk patient – Younger than 45, no comorbidities, and clinically stable
High risk patient – Older than 45, younger than 45 with comorbidities, or clinically unstable
Treatment Options
Low risk patients
Supportive care with fluids, fever control, and rest
Elemental Zinc 50mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Vitamin C 1000mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Vitamin D3 5000iu 1 time a day for 7 days
Optional over the counter options
Quercetin 500mg 2 times a day for 7 days or
Epigallocatechin-gallate (EGCG) 400mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Moderate / High risk patients
Elemental Zinc 50-100mg once a day for 7 days
Vitamin C 1000mg 1 time a day for 7 days
Vitamin D3 10000iu once a day for 7 days or 50000iu once a day for 1-2 days
Azithromycin 500mg 1 time a day for 5 days or
Doxycycline 100mg 2 times a day for 7 days
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) 200mg 2 times a day for 5-7 days and/or
Ivermectin 0.4-0.5mg/kg/day for 5-7 days Either or both HCQ and IVM can be used, and if one only, the second agent may be added after about 2 days of treatment if obvious recovery has not yet been observed etc.
Treatment Options
Dexamethasone 6-12mg 1 time a day for 7 days or
Prednisone 20mg twice a day for 7 days, taper as needed
Budesonide 1mg/2cc solution via nebulizer twice a day for 7 days
Blood thinners (i.e. Lovenox, Eliquis, Xarelto, Pradaxa, Aspirin)
Colchicine 0.6mg 2-3 times a day for 5-7 days
Monoclonal antibodies
Home IV fluids and oxygen
TRY TO KEEP PATIENTS OUT OF THE HOSPITAL
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304258
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7365891/
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf5014633
https://vdmeta.com/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7318306/
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jf5014633
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304258
https://ivmmeta.com/
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2021436
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7392554/
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.01.26.21250494v1
logo
Subscribe To Newsletter
About Dr. Zelenko
Conservapedia
Zelenko Protocols
Covid-19 Pre-hospital Treatment
Prophylaxis Protocol
Telemedicine Appointment
With Dr. Zelenko
© 2021 Vladimir Zelenko M.D. All Rights Reserved
Media Inquiries
Parler LinkedIn Telegram
This is second-hand hearsay, but I believe it is true because it was told to me by a fellow-congregant at my shul whom I consider to be trustworthy. He is a full-time delivery person for a supply company, and several hospitals are among the institutions that his company delivers supplies to on a regular basis. He told me that three nurses who work at one or more of these hospitals told him that many patients there died very soon of heart attacks after being injected with a cv19-2 vaccine. Bu they were under strict orders to keep this fact secret, and were warned that they would be fired if they made this situation public.
Again, this is second-hand hearsay, but I am inclined to believe my friend Robert that three nurses told him this.
How much this young woman stated that should be blatantly obvious to us all….Please watch this short 15min video of nurse describing the malfeasance in the hospitals where vax injuries are the predominant harm being suffered and VAERS reporting is prevented by doctors and no treatment for Covid beyond the toxic Remdisivir and much much more…
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/09/11/an-articulate-nurse-dealing-with-covid-hospitalization-gives-honest-insight-about-what-really-is-happening-alarming-secondary-confirmation-of-details-provided-and-cited/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=an-articulate-nurse-dealing-with-covid-hospitalization-gives-honest-insight-about-what-really-is-happening-alarming-secondary-confirmation-of-details-provided-and-cited
@Bear
Actually, I would amend that statement to : Simple formula if you want to improve your chances of not getting very sick or dying, one should get treatment for Covid, just like they do for every other form of pneumonia or disease. If you choose to take the risk of serious side effects to gain the failing benefit of the vax, you should pursue the vax as you care, but treatment should not be withheld from sick people. This is the very definition of barbarism and it is also the reason those who are infected become seriously ill and die.
We can discuss the 31RCTs or the 63 controlled trials that show the use of IVM cocktails(https://twitter.com/L_Chappi/status/1436430135994032128/photo/1), but it really is a detail beyond the simple logic that the ill need to be treated medically. The use of medicine is complicated but it is based on simple logic and some intuition applied to complicated mechanisms as expressed in physiology to combat disease. But if we just send the ill home, this is no use of medicine or even reasonable judgement. Nothing is deduced, applied or effected – the sick go home to suffer needlessly as they breed more variants while they infect their loved ones and perpetuate the disease to the vaccinated or the unvaccinated as they are each susceptible. Who would support that, who would tolerate that, and forgetting everything else, why would anyone believe anything from a source advocating that. Vaccinated or unvaccinated, there should be no disparity and no disagreement – the ill need medical treatment.
When people get ill, we treat them for their illness. Basic as it is, no person on earth should be surprised by this. Hepatitis, kidney disease, heart disease, pancreatitis, meningitis, broken bones, even a migraine head ache – no patient is ever told, “sorry come back when you are on the heel of death and we will then do very little and see if you can survive or not” which is the CDC protocol for Covid. These people don’t need vaccinations. The topic of vaccinations are irrelevant to the presence of disease. When disease is present, regardless if they have been vaccinated or not, a patient needs to be treated as if their life depends upon your help, because millions have died precisely due to the fact this basic principle was ignored as treatment was withheld until they were so sick they were turning blue, literally.
Simple formula if you want to improve your chances of not getting very sick or dying one should get vaccinated.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/vast-majority-of-serious-covid-19-cases-are-unvaccinated-says-health-official/
Boys more at risk from Pfizer jab side-effect than Covid, suggests study
US researchers say teenagers are more likely to get vaccine-related myocarditis than end up in hospital with Covid
Fri 10 Sep 2021 13.00 EDT
Healthy boys may be more likely to be admitted to hospital with a rare side-effect of the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid vaccine that causes inflammation of the heart than with Covid itself, US researchers claim.
Their analysis of medical data suggests that boys aged 12 to 15, with no underlying medical conditions, are four to six times more likely to be diagnosed with vaccine-related myocarditis than ending up in hospital with Covid over a four-month period.
Most children who experienced the rare side-effect had symptoms within days of the second shot of Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, though a similar side-effect is seen with the Moderna jab. About 86% of the boys affected required some hospital care, the authors said.
Saul Faust, professor of paediatric immunology and infectious diseases at the University of Southampton, who was not involved in the work, said the findings appeared to justify the cautious approach taken on teenage vaccines by the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation.
The JCVI did not recommend vaccinating healthy 12 to 15-year-olds, but referred the matter to the UK’s chief medical officers who are expected to make a final decision next week. Children aged 12 to 15 who are particularly vulnerable to Covid, or who live with an at-risk person, are eligible for the shots.
…
Prof Adam Finn, a member of JCVI at the University of Bristol, said: “I stand by the JCVI advice, which is not to go ahead at this time with vaccinating healthy 12 to 15-year-olds on health outcome risk-benefit grounds given the current uncertainty – as there is a small but plausible risk that rare harms could turn out to outweigh modest benefits.”
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/10/boys-more-at-risk-from-pfizer-jab-side-effect-than-covid-suggests-study
Here is the link for the research paper for any interested in reading it, it is NOT written for laymen to easily understand, just fyi:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.21.423721v2.full.pdf
VERY IMPORTANT RESEARCH with clear implications on myocarditis and the Vax and the virus! The spike protein has been shown, in pre-clinical studies, to affect a type of cell that surround blood vessels in the heart, called pericytes. The researchers showed that the pericytes were not infected by the virus. But they also showed that the Spike protein binding was sufficient to cause heart damage due to inflammation after the Spike attached to the receptors on these heart pericytes(if this is too unclear tell me). This means the vaccines, which have free floating spike in the blood after the shot, are free to affect these pericytes and cause the heart inflammation which causes the myocarditis. The vax injections carry a large number of fake viruses and an infection may be caused by a few hudred to a few thousand viruses, ie the vax injection has many magnitudes higher levels of Spike producing fake viruses over what can be present in a real infection. This was a in vitro study on cells outside of the body, and this is a preliminary finding, pending more research to verify or disprove these findings, but there is a catch. This research was not financed by Pharma nor the govt(unsurprisingly given the possible findings related to the vax) and the follow up research will be much more expensive, ie they will probably not be done without some independent source of funding.
Here is the link for the research paper for any interested in reading it, it is NOT written for laymen to understand easily, just fyi:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.21.423721v2.full.pdf
VERY IMPORTANT RESEARCH with clear implications on the Vax!
Here is the link for the research paper for any interested in reading it, it is NOT written for laymen to understand easily, just fyi.