By Devvy Kidd, NEWS WITH VIEWS |September 6th, 2021
As I said at the end of my last column, COVID Injections: Killing, Permanently Disabling Nurses, Doctors, Teachers, you always need to go back to the genesis of the problem. Identify is first because if you don’t know what the problem is, how can one possibly solve it? I’ve made dates bold because this is very important.
February 3, 2020: President Trump declares a public health emergency. Based on what? His staff informed him computer models predict 2.2 million will die; reportedly it was Fauci the Faker who delivered that canard. Where did that number come from? Prof. Neil Ferguson. His ‘models’ have been rightfully shredded but the damage was done.[1][1A]
January 21, 2020: CDC Confirms First US Coronavirus Case – “A Washington state resident becomes the first person in the United States with a confirmed case of the 2019 novel coronavirus, having returned from Wuhan on January 15, thanks to overnight polymerase chain reaction testing.” (PCR)
STOP. We know the PCR test, polymerase chain reaction, does NOT test for any virus. That is a fact which cannot be denied. The PCR test is a manufacturing technique never meant to be a diagnostic tool. The CDC supposedly has best of the best scientists and experts. How could they not have known they were using a test that’s meaningless for this alleged virus?
So, from day one, the CDC used a PCR test to ‘confirm’ the first COVID-19 case in the U.S. “A clinical specimen was collected and sent to CDC overnight, where laboratory testing yesterday confirmed the diagnosis via CDC’s Real time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test.”
Let me again use this example: Dr. Smith tells his patient he’s going to test him for diabetes using a test that doesn’t test for diabetes. What do you suppose would be his patient’s reaction to that?
Now, if you click on the link above, a confirmed case, it goes to a January 21, 2020, CDC page. “CDC has been proactively preparing for the introduction of 2019-nCoV in the United States for weeks, including:
“Developing a diagnostic test to detect this virus in clinical specimens, accelerating the time it takes to detect infection. Currently, testing for this virus must take place at CDC, but in the coming days and weeks, CDC will share these tests with domestic and international partners.”
Let’s go back to the January 21, 2020, link above. The first case is allegedly confirmed. Patient Zero went to a clinic on January 19, 2020. On the afternoon of January 20th, his case is “confirmed” to be COVID-19. But, once again, they used a test that is 100% faulty for the purpose it was being used.[2][3]
March 19,2020: WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic– “The World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020, has declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic.” Global?
Hmm. Dec. 3,2020: WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic – “The meeting follows the announcement yesterday by Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO’s Director-General, that COVID-19 can be characterized as a pandemic.” What?
Here’s how the CDC sold their lie. Dated Dec. 29, 2020:
“SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.
“One important way that CDC has supported global efforts to study and learn about SARS-CoV-2 in the laboratory was by growing the virus in cell culture and ensuring that it was widely available. Researchers in the scientific and medical community can use virus obtained from this work in their studies.”
Well, it sure sounds convincing, doesn’t it? I mean ‘isolated’ is important. The only problem is that bothersome thing called ‘purified’ in identifying a new virus. No wonder the CDC referred to COVID as a ‘new novel’ coronavirus. A fictional novel. There’s another problem. Back to this posted on the FDA’s web site: CDC document “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” July 13, 2020, page 42 where the CDC is instructing the use of a PCR test, it says:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”
The CDC is explaining how to test for a virus for which they have no quantified virus isolated specimen available using a test that doesn’t test for any virus. They have no existing virus isolates in July, but by December, they claim to have isolated SARS-Co-V02 in the laboratory – months into the “pandemic”.
In January 2020, first case confirmed using a PCR test. July 2020, they have no isolated virus. December 2020, they have the isolated virus. Above, Dec. 29, 2020, they state it was isolated “in the laboratory and available”. So, from July 13,2020 to December 29, 2020, they allegedly now have isolated specimen, but not a purified – clean – particles isolated specimen.
More importantly, if the CDC had allegedly isolated this phantom virus in late December 2020 (exact date unknown), what scientific protocols were used to isolate this alleged SARS-CoV-2, “that causes COVID-19” exists? It certainly didn’t come from the Communist Chinese government or their equivalent of our CDC:
“China didn’t have scientific proof of this ‘new novel coronavirus’ as I’ve pointed out in previous columns: “Ten days ago I watched a video that absolutely caused my jaw to drop. This interview on Jan. 23, 2021, was between an NBC reporter in Wuhan, China and Dr. Wu Zunyou, Chinese Center for Disease Control. In response to the reporter’s question about why they haven’t shared data, Zunyou said, “They didn’t isolate the virus.” And, there you have it. Computer models are not specimens.
If this phantom virus came from Wuhan, China who did NOT isolate this alleged virus, how could the CDC have already “isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community” in late Dec. 2020? Patient Zero had returned from China in mid-January.
Trump put globalist, Mike Pence, in charge of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, established on January 29, 2020. Fauci the Faker and scarf model, Deborah Birx, became the superstars. Despite the predicted apocalypse about to hit this country, big chief expert, Fauci the Faker,said nothing to worry about. Drum roll, please:
“On February 17, 2020, Fauci opined that the danger of the coronavirus was “just minuscule” but that Americans should be worried about the “real and present danger” of seasonal flu.
“On February 29, 2020, Fauci asserted, “Right now, at this moment, there is no need to change anything that you’re doing on a day-by-day basis. Right now, the risk is still low.”
“On March 9, 2020, Fauci commented that: “If you are a healthy young person, there is no reason if you want to go on a cruise ship, go on a cruise ship.”
Beyond any legal deficiencies, there’s no question the CDC & FDA had to know a PCR test does not test for any virus therefore, they have committed fraud on a massive scale. In the legal world, fraud “is both a civil tort and criminal wrong“.
The same applies to the manufacturers of PCR tests they sold to labs, hospitals and all other health care providers world-wide. Their product – even stretched to the merry-go-round called cycles – is beyond defective yet they sold it knowing – or at least should have known it does not detect infection or any virus. That’s fraud.
The whole world – not just the U.S. was shut down based on number of cases identified using PCR tests plastered on every TV, vomited up by governors and mayors who fell for the con. International Class Action Lawsuits Against Corona PCR Test Manufacturers
Nov. 9, 2020: SCIENCE FAIL: Portuguese court rules PCR tests are unreliable, unlawful “evidence” of alleged Covid-19 infections
“These individuals sued for fraudulent science and won, setting a precedent for the PCR test to hopefully be discarded as pseudo scientific quackery, which is exactly what it is. Even The New York Times told the truth by revealing that most people who test “positive” using a PCR test are actually negative and healthy.
“Testing data collected from Massachusetts, New York, Nevada and elsewhere show that upwards of 90 percent of people who test “positive” with a PCR test are perfectly normal and disease-free.
“Given how much scientific doubt exists – as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter – about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it,” the Portuguese court corroborated about the faulty nature of the PCR test.
“It is important to keep in mind that the PCR was never intended to be used as a method of trying to copy genetic material, which is how it is being used in Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) testing.”
While this is a long read, it’s important: BOMBSHELL: HHS documents admit the CDC has never isolated any “covid-19 virus” …PCR tests nothing but instrument NOISE … the global HOAX is rapidly unraveling, August 8, 2021
A great deal is covered in that piece above including what I wrote about in mid-2020: The same time this alleged COLVID-19 virus hits is at the same time as the annual influenza flu season.
“On July 21st of this year, the CDC announced it is withdrawing its authorization of the current PCR test for covid-19, saying the PCR test would no longer be considered valid science after December 31st of this year. It then states that a new PCR test will, “facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses,” meaning the new test will reportedly be able to tell the difference between covid and the common cold. This implies that the current test — the one used to push global covid pandemic hysteria — does not achieve such a differentiation.
“In effect, it appears the CDC has been fabricating the science behind global “pandemics” for decades, using the media to spread mass hysteria where no pandemic existed. One of the best and most recent cases is the recent Zika virus, where mainstream media outlets were screaming that babies born to new mothers in Florida would be born with shrunken heads (microcephaly) because of the Zika virus. Just as with the covid scheme, billions of dollars were funneled into pharmaceutical companies to research a vaccine for Zika, which turned out to be nothing more than fictional hype.”
The lives of tens of millions of Americans destroyed financially based on a test the CDC had to have known from day one does not detect any virus or infection. Emotional wrecks dealing with having your livelihood yanked right out from under you. Hysteria pumping from the prostitute media 24/7 with the battle cry only a vaccine will save us all.
A new virus no one can prove exists
Regular readers know neither the CDC nor any other official health agency in more than 40 countries has been able to prove this SARS-CoV-2 exists.[4][5][6][7] The CDC has been playing a deadly game of deception.
Where is the Evidence for the Existence of the ‘Novel Coronavirus’, SARS-CoV-2?, May 8, 2020– This is a very important read. No Gold Standard, No Fulfillment of Koch’s Postulates.I’ll dispense with quotes here due to space.
On Dr. Robert O. Young’s web site is a plethora of CDC responses which is evidence in a court of law that absolutely kills this monstrous lie about a new ‘novel’ coronavirus. Scroll down and look at the first document dated January 23, 2020, and the analysis below. It validates so much about this monstrous deception pulled off by the CDC and the FDA backing them.
Next document down is June 7,2021, from researcher Christine Massey and yet another one of her FOIA’s to the CDC. Covered this in my December 2020 column. Ms. Massey had already filed the equivalent of FOIAs to many health departments in several countries requesting proof COIVD-19 virus exists; going back to mid-2020.
My dear friend, Larry Becraft, who is a constitutional attorney filed a FOIA on my behalf with the CDC on May 7, 2021: Prove COVID-19 exists. What protocols were used to identify it as a ‘new novel’ coronavirus. See here. Their response was several useless links. The one to focus on is here. June 6, 2020: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States – “We isolated virus from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens from this patient and characterized the viral sequence, replication properties, and cell culture tropism.”
I had to look up nasopharyngeal. Had to gag over the PCR being ideal for COVID-19. “The current standard for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 once a nasopharyngeal swab has been obtained is the real-time fluorescence-based polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)…RT-PCR is considered to be an ideal analytical technique for SARS-CoV-2 detection due to its reliability, low cost, and sensitivity, particularly when compared to alternative diagnostic approaches like cell culture, antigen detection, and serological methods.” That page led me to another reference:
Oropharyngeal swabs, Sept. 16,2020: “In present study, we mainly aimed to evaluate specimen types and specimen collection timepoint on the positive detection of 2019 novel coronavirus from patients at infection late stage based on RT-PCR testing…Paired nasopharyngeal swabs, nasal swabs, oropharyngeal swabs and anal swabs were collected from patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 during infection late stage before washing in the morning and afternoon on the same day. Then virus RNA was extracted and tested for 2019-nCoV identification by RT-PCR within 24 h.”
As of today, neither the CDC or any other official health agency contacted can prove SARS-CoV-2 actually exists as a new virus. Their whole game has been propped up by the PCR test which is nothing but fraud as it relates to this alleged virus. The CDC’s response to my FOIA was nothing but smoke and mirrors.
Like countless others, I was on board with the Koch’s Postulates criteria. It’s been the gold standard for identifying viruses since 1890 – 131 years ago. Until I watched a couple of videos on identifying viruses using 21st century science. As I wrote in my column on this: “Like TV shows solving murders. The killer was finally identified 20 years later using his DNA which wasn’t available at the time the murder took place. If Dr. Stefan Lanka is scientifically correct, SARS-CoV-2 is not a virus.” The science protocols being used are obsolete and shouldn’t be used anymore.
Dr. Lanka proved measles is not a virus in a court of law and neither can COVID-19 be one. Cancer is not treated with a vaccine but is a disease. Yes, I know, COVID is respiratory but don’t you think a vaccine being used should be for the correct disease or virus? Those dangerous experimental injections being passed off as vaccines are not working, they are killing and maiming humans all over the planet. They will never work.Despite 95% vaccination rate, Cornell today has five times more COVID cases than it did this time last year
Those mRNA injections are technology not meant to prevent anyone from getting this phantom virus or protect anyone from spreading it. January 17, 2021: WE REPEAT: The mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Is Positively Not a Vaccine
People are dying from COVID-19. Yes, Americans are dying but from what? A weaponized influenza flu is what I believe. But, it’s not what I believe, it’s what solid science proves which has not been done -except by Dr. Lanka.
For those who are just learning about this nightmare, take the time to watch these two documentaries: Plandemic – Indoctrination, the most censored, banned and watched documentary of all time. Plandemic 2 if you haven’t seen it.
Lawsuits
Sept. 3, 2021, NY Health Commissioner repeals mask mandate for unvaxxed after federal lawsuit filed
The EUA lawsuit is here and continues on pause while briefs, etc., are filed. The CMS whistleblower lawsuit same status.
Reiner Fuellmich Update: We are starting to win in Courts!
There are lawsuits around the country trying to stop employers from firing employees who refuse to get those experimental injections, colleges and universities for refusing to allow students to attend without getting one of those experimental injections and the list goes on. Some have already been kicked out. Reprehensible. And shame on state legislatures and governors who haven’t done what Montana did: Make it against the law to fire an employee for refusing the jab.
Two areas that need lawsuits. One I already covered: COVID-19 Patents: State Little RICO Acts Prosecution? – What we must do is find a state prosecutor willing to fight. See this really important interview, July 11, 2021: “The Sequoia patent on coronavirus treatment was issued and published before the CDC patent on coronavirus was allowed. The only way Sequoia could know information in CDC patent is by insider means, because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion. This is not a theory, it is evidence. This is a RICO case.”
I don’t know any state prosecutors, but through networking and getting this out to every social media platform, someone knows someone who does. A State Little RICO prosecution would send shock waves across this country if once filed we, all of us, do everything we can to make sure it gets exposed.
Second, there are laws on suing elected officials and individuals who work in an official capacity. Sovereign immunity. Not a completely closed door but not a simple one either. What we need is individuals who owned or still own a business either forced to close their doors forever or barely hung on during the lockdowns to sue.
Those draconian lockdowns were a result of cases of a virus no one can prove exists using a totally faulty testing scheme. Governors ordered those lockdowns based on the lies and fraud by the CDC, Fauci the Faker and state health officials. We’re talking more than 265,000 businesses gone for good. With the threat of more restrictions by the day putting even more business owners still hanging on in jeopardy, it seems to me a strong case can be made.
Because I’m not a lawyer I don’t know all the legal “stuff” for that type of lawsuit but the evidence is there. If 5, 10 or 50 individuals lost their business or suffered from the lockdowns based on fraud retained legal counsel (not a divorce attorney) to go after those responsible – elected or state health officials who should have known whether or not the information coming from the CDC was factual and accurate – we might bust this nightmare wide open.
What will be challenged is the existence of SARS-Co-V-2 and using fraudulent testing to determine number of cases. The genesis, where it all started. Now, if you had a hundred of those lawsuits, it would turn into a class action lawsuit. None of which is cheap but if you have big numbers of plaintiffs willing to kick in X number of dollars for those who went out of business and a little extra for businesses still in operation, enough money could be generated to get this done. And donations from We the People. And believe me, such lawsuits would rock this country.
All we hear is “We’re following CDC guidelines” vomit. The proof is there the CDC has lied about the existence of COVID-19 and the RT PCR/PCR tests. Fraud, collusion and any other statutes smart attorneys can add to the list but go after them. Otherwise, while trying to save people’s jobs and lives, by not attacking the existence of SARS-Co-V-2 and the PCR testing, it continues to give legitimacy to the lies.
There are so many cracks in the dam now over this COVID, striking back in a big way must be done. Over in other countries they’ve been successful in overturning quarantines and getting courts to recognize the PCR test is completely worthless. Reiner Fuellmich over in Germany has done a remarkable job with all his contacts and lawsuits.
I’ve watched God knows how many zillion hours of video interviews, read articles from all the medical and science experts. I can keep writing columns giving VAERS skewed updates of deaths, all the other categories of ‘adverse events’ and highlight more interviews. But, it’s time to really go after the right targets (that would be legally, FBI).
If we don’t go after them in a big way, this is not going to end. Democrat governors are licking their chops, bank on it to shut down states, again, come flu season. More lockdowns ruining Thanksgiving, Christmas, continued torturing children with masks. Cowardly GOP governors aren’t much better. Tune out the prostitute media, the Hollywood fools and all the other useful idiots. Let us concentrate on finding one state prosecutor (which could start the ball rolling) and hopefully, hundreds if not thousands of businesses owners (plaintiffs) who lost everything or are still struggling over two monster lies: The alleged virus and bloated number of cases based on PCR tests.
The best, smartest, most experienced and courageous molecular biologists, biologists, virologists and doctors who’ve been speaking out here in the U.S. and other countries will be expert witnesses in a court room. Dr. David Martin on the State Little RICO. The list is too long to name each one but we’ve got them to testify. What we need are experienced lawyers willing to go after the criminals.
Believe me, if I were a lawyer I most certainly would be networking to get the above done. With social media the truth is running hot in this country. Our enemy has been Goliath but we can and must turn the tables and become Goliath. We must.
Note: For a thorough, comprehensive education on the Fed, the income tax, education, Medicare, SS, the critical, fraudulent ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment and more, be sure to order my book by calling 800-955-0116 or click the link, “Taking Politics Out of Solutions“. 400 pages of facts and solutions.
© 2021 Devvy Kidd – All Rights Reserved
E-Mail Devvy: devvyk@npn.net
Footnotes:
[1] – How Wrong Were the Models and Why?, April 23, 2020
[1A] – COVID: How self-entitled frauds at Imperial College changed the world
[2] – Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Euro surveillance 2020, Nov. 27, 2020. 29 pgs
[3] – The Invented Pandemic, the Lack of Virus Isolation and the Invalid COVID-19 Test by Dr. Stefano Scoglio.
[4] – No Governments Have Isolated COVID-19 Virus–What Does That Mean?
[5] – Phantom Virus: In Search of Sars-CoV-2 by Torsten Engelbrecht, Dr. Stefano Scoglio & Konstantin Demeter, Off Guardian
[6] – Leading Corona Researchers Admit That They Have No Scientific Proof for the Existence of a virus
[7] – Where is the Evidence for the Existence of the ‘Novel Coronavirus’, SARS-CoV-2?
Related:
VIDEO: Former Senior Trump HHS COVID Advisor Says Pandemic Isn’t Real, ‘Task Force’ Deliberately Lied To America–“Former senior Trump administration Health and Human Services COVID-19 advisor Dr. Paul E. Alexander made an appearance on The Stew Peters Show to state that the Coronavirus Task Force had deliberately deceived the American people, detailing the infighting that occurred between the Task Force and President Donald Trump while he was still in office.” Trump haters blaming Trump should watch that interview.
Delta Variant Death Rate Among Vaccinated Over 5 Times HIGHER Than the Unvaccinated in England
Alarming: Experimental COVID Vaccines Now Proving to be Extremely Toxic to Humans
Recognizing the Obvious: Hard Data from Israel Reveals Vaccine Failure
Did Fauci Just Admit He Lied About Herd Immunity To Trick Americans Into Vaccine?
Here is the damning paper trail of Fauci’s deception so loved and embraced by the imbeciles in Hollywood, the prostitute media and more career politicians that I can count. Read it.
Proof that the pandemic was planned & with purpose, Sept. 30, 2020
<
>
<
>
@peloni
Here is the link (they must have put it back, I guess);
https://tv.gab.com/channel/starcrest/view/vera-sharav-nazi-holocaust-survivor-61352c4b085004cc4cecc75e
If you found it only “moving and credible”, you got nothing out of it, unfortunately.
As far as “the elimination of the middlemen in US-Pharma contracts”:
If they wanted to eliminate him, they would have done so and his name would be forgotten.
If they don’t, it means they need him.
Anyway, we won’t convince each other on this topic.
@Reader
The deferral was only thru Dec 2020 and could not be endlessly delayed. It is a point of legislation that could only be remedied by a change in legislation. It was to be part of the Trump Medicare reform plan, but as I say, none of it was achieved. Your presumption is that the tax would be cut and that the reform would not be done. You have nothing to substantiate that conclusion. This is what the word hypothetical means.
He did dare. “the elimination of the middlemen in US-Pharma contracts, the reduction in cost of epi-pens and insulin by several hundred dollars per patient per month, and the price matching for the US costs with any other nations costs of Pharma’s products, was massive and it would result in untold billions of dollars in savings to the US Medicare system” these were done. It wasn’t a threat. It was signed and enacted before he left office.
Also Trump wasn’t “allowed” to run by anyone. He ran against the party and took it over. He ran against 17 oncomers in 2016 – each was dedicated to stopping Trump at all cost. Even after it was known that they couldn’t stop him they still wouldn’t endorse him. If they could have unseated him in 2020 they would have, just as if they could keep him from running in the future, they would. They don’t control him or his supporters – and that is what makes him most dangerous to the others, he can’t be bought and he won’t be stopped.
Trump is a dominating character, full of bravado and intent upon his own vision. He loves this country and has sacrificed greatly in his short political career. I find him to be a sincerely motivated to improve the condition of the country and the world.
@Reader
Yes, I saw the video with Vera Sharav over the weekend. I was going to share it, but the link was taken down and I couldn’t find another link to the video, so thank you for sharing it. A very moving and credible statement, I believe. Everyone should watch it.
@peloni
The deferral WAS A FACT and would continue to be A FACT, it wasn’t a plan it was already implemented it would continue to be implemented.
The tax was “only delayed” because it is illegal to abolish it outright and it would continue to be “delayed”.
Massive $$ are never gained with the prospect of anything, especially with the politicians’ campaign promises.
He wouldn’t dare touch the Pharma or any other owners of the government (and by that I don’t mean “We the People)”, and not because he is a bad person but because otherwise they wouldn’t let him get anywhere NEAR running for President.
Sorry to rain on your parade but he (or anyone else) is NOT Moshiach.
He WILL get elected because the PTB will need to give the population the opportunity to let out the steam, and then we will see what happens (if we are still alive).
He also threatened the FDA to force it to start the “whirlwind vaccine project” faster but, of course, he was deceived into doing this (he was the only one to be deceived, of course, the rest of them were simply evil).
BTW, have you watched the video I posted by Vera Sharav (nothing to do with Trump) a great interview?
@Reader
So on one hand you ignore what he plans to do with Medicare reform while at the same time saddling him with his plans to cut the Employee taxes for the middle class. In fact you are missing the relationship of the reduced cost benefit of the Pharma reform as it relates to Medicare and Healthcare reform. These matters are all related. The employee tax deferral only affected those businesses that took advantage of it, realizing they might have to pay it later and many did not take advantage of it.
Also the Employee tax deferral only applied to those making under $104K. But the massive $$ gained by the Medicare system with the prospect of the elimination of the middlemen in US-Pharma contracts, the reduction in cost of epi-pens and insulin by several hundred dollars per patient per month, and the price matching for the US costs with any other nations costs of Pharma’s products, was massive and it would result in untold billions of dollars in savings to the US Medicare system. Such savings could be used to offset the proposed employeed tax cut, which was never cut, only delayed. So you should realize that these initiatives, the Pharma reforms, and the partial Employee tax delay were not unrelated. One would largely pay for, or more than paid for, the other, and again the tax delay was not cut, so nothing on that front was certain without a cooperative Congress.
And this was without any actual steps to repair the badly broken Medicare system by Trumps regulatory reforms which were first employed on the VA – so he knew the benefit such reforms would have on Medicare both in cost reduction and improved care. And the regulatory reform was not dependent upon the Congress and neither was the Pharma reform.
You say:
when in fact these were not hypothetical reforms(meaning Pharma reforms) and there was no defunding of anything as the tax was only delayed. So, I do think there is a strong misunderstanding on your part of what Trump actually did do. Regarding what he intended to do, we can look at that as a whole, or ignore it as that was quite hypothetical as you stated.
Again you exhibit a tendency to people together and it blurs reality to a point of poor recognition. Trump is neither a Dem or a Rep. He has supported each and was illegitimately disposed by both. The Dems stole the election and the Reps allowed themselves to be bought off, even to their own detriment, and both played their part, simply to rid themselves of Trump’s reforms which they have quickly moved to roll back – his policies were the antithesis of their interests, which is why he needed to use the Executive Orders. They were the establishment and he was elected to reform their criminal infrastructure and limit their well established patterns of graft, be in forever wars or the well paying special interests such as Pharma.
A DISCLAIMER: I have nothing against Trump personally. I am convinced we are being played by the PTB and have NO ONE TO VOTE FOR (just like in Israel or any other country in the world). Of course, if one wants to be deceived, it is his choice – he’ll have to wake up eventually but in a lot more pain.
I never said anything about him cutting the actual programs.
The tax finances 100% of Social Security and 60% of Medicare.
He “postponed” the tax (because it is impossible to abolish it under the law) under the guise of helping the working people increase their salaries (by a couple of percentage points) and promised to keep doing so if reelected.
This is like permanently cutting the salaries (eventually down to zero) of the lowest paid workers at the office to raise the manager’s salary to help him cope.
This is a fact, not my fantasy.
The wouda, coulda, shoulda of the hypothetical reforms have not prevented the defunding of the Social Security and Medicare and it would proceed unimpeded.
Tens of millions of the elderly depend on Social Security as their main or sole source of income.
ALL the politicians (Democrats, as well as Republicans) have been dreaming of abolishing Social Security and Medicare and using various tricks to accomplish this (the government has been tirelessly converting the original Medicare into HMOs, for example).
They also “borrowed” large amounts of money from the Social Security fund, and now they are screaming about the crisis.
This is, probably, so that they won’t have to cut their war budget so that they can continue to play their little-tin-soldiers game because their bosses, the corporations took all of the real economy to China when “they won the Cold War”:
All our politicians are very rich and the very rich love the idea of a really severe economic depression because “it clears out the trash”.
And, yes, Trump IS one of them – I listened to an interview with him on YouTube where he expressed these views.
Should I apologize for not wanting to think of myself as trash that has to be cleared out – by taking away my Social Security or by killing me with a “vaccine”?
@Reader
Trump is anything but one of “them” in any way, shape or imagining. This informational war that we are all suffering the consequences of, is only being waged because Trump, ever the reformer, went to Washington to return the power and wealth of the nation back to the people. His plans were so revolutionary that he spent as much time fighting his own party as he did the democrats. His agenda was a stark challenge to the establishment and set him quite apart from them. He intended to rip out the machinery that acted to soak the American taxpayer at every level of existence to the benefit of special interest groups and foreign nations. Trump also planned to eliminate the dense regulations that actually carries an enormous economic burden upon the economy and which results in lower wages and, consequently, lowers federal revenues. And his rhetoric was not idle talk or reckless imaginings. His reforms were significant and undermined the Administrative State both on a level of funding and that of policy.
Regarding the Medicare tax deferral, it was a move to help the middle class to survive the “14days to drop the curve” under his emergency powers, but it had nothing to do with the Medicare program itself. The middle class was financially slaughtered by the results of the China plague, and he recognized it was no fault of their own, and that they deserved every assistance he could offer them. But in reality, it was also more fundamental than that. Trump never found a tax he didn’t want to cut. Cutting taxes increases revenues. This was the reality behind the Trump economic boom.
Also, his cutting the Medicare tax did not in any way affect one dime of Medicare payments to any beneficiary. First of all, it was a deferral which he intended to address in the second term. The deferral still left employers with an presumed liability if the deferral was not supported by a change in the law, and it was voluntary. These two points actually undermined the effective use of the policy change, as I suspect most employers, especially in 2020, could not easily accept even a small liability to grapple with in the economic nightmare of 2020, and businesses hate uncertainty.
He never will cut the Medicare program, but did intend to make it more efficient. He intended to restructure the program(regulatory-reforms) so that it actually served the purpose for which it was intended in the 2nd term. Such reforms were to be very much along the lines of what he achieved with the Veterans Affairs, and the healthcare veterans received, for which he received an historic 91% approval from the veterans(37% under Obama). So cutting the Medicare tax entirely, was to be part of the Medicare reform of his second term, and which he did not do, unfortunately. Had he the opportunity to do so, it would have abandon no one on the streets as you suggest. Recall the Phama reforms he achieved under the Executive Orders of 2020, resulted in massive financial benefits that Medicare would have been a large beneficiary. And that was just a hint of the waste/fraud/special interest that was to eliminated by his second term.
@peloni
Yes, they are very powerful and are capable of doing a lot of damage but the situation is actually much better than I thought.
I thought they controlled the voiceless and powerless 100% of the doctors and it is not true at all.
Nothing lasts forever.
I wouldn’t hope for Trump doing anything about this in his 2nd term (A DISCLAIMER: I am NOT shilling for Biden or for anybody else – I think there is NOBODY there to vote for, we are simply being deceived by them letting us vote every 4 years for one of the 2 preselected puppets).
As much as you might object, Trump is actually one of them – he started defunding Social Security and Medicare, and promised to continue defunding them if reelected (by suspending the tax – it is impossible to simply abolish it).
Imagine tens of millions of elderly starving in the streets as a result in a few years.
Although in a few years it may become a moot point because the COVID vaccine might finish them off by then anyway.
@Reader
I didn’t say they were govt organizations. I simply described them as autocratic organizations – and I am quite correct in describing them as such. The AMA has failed over the years to properly represent the voice of the physicians they were suppose to represent. Their membership has plummeted, and over the years they came to represent only about 1/6-1/10 of the practicing medical community – you will read of a survey in June 2021 where they make up 96% of doctors polled, but it was an AMA survey and they polled 301 doctors, so I will let you draw your own conclusions. Their threats to attack clinicians by acting to motivate state licensing boards to pull and review their license for treating patients who are ill can not be described as anything less than an autocratic move, but one they did not make lightly.
While the AMA lacks a strong support of clinicians, they are quite well established, politically, and very well networked within medical infrastructure – they control a great influence upon the administrative end of medicine, a role which the medical community strongly opposed. Hence, the AMA is a political arm of the medical administrative state on the Federal level and holds great influence nation-wide with varying degrees. Texas, for example, is a state where the medical boards were not inclined, earlier this year, to support terminating medical licenses for doctors who treated patients, but there were a large number of doctors who had to endure the license review process, while no one knew how the reviews would resolve. As things concluded, these reviews in Texas were dismissed in favor of the practicing doctors, but that is not likely to be true in other states where political realities are better influenced by such Federal authorities than is Texas.
So it isn’t about the licensing group who issues the medical license. Each state supports the license and has the authority, given complaints by other clinicians or patients, to revue the clinician’s license. McCullogh, Barton, Urso, and Immanuel are a handful of such physicians who have withstood such license reviews. The state boards are political animals, of course, and this is a political chess match in which many things can result regardless of preconceived notions. The state of Georgia should open people’s eyes to the reality that the Republican states are as corrupt as the Democrats so, we will see what comes next, but establishing a new licensing group is not a useful solution, and creating your own hospital system is pure fantasy. The hospital systems are well in the grip of the govt and the medical administrators/Pharma control this political game too well to allow it to be overthrown without many changes, which I believe was part of Trump’s intended agenda for his second term, mores the pity. Much like the election fraud, these criminal elites have no intention of releasing control of such sources of power, unless it is forced from their hands.
@peloni
These are NOT government organizations.
These are lousy (very big, yes) non-profits.
They are SWIMMING in the restraint of trade.
The 1st one of those was started by 245 doctors!
How about suing them for hazing that passes for the medical resident training and hurts thousands of patients every year!
Screw their certifications, give your own certifications, buy your own hospitals, etc.
Go back to being a real doctor, not some pharma slave who only knows how to prescribe meds and collect his fees, and the patients will come.
Oy-oy-oying has never accomplished anything.
@Reader
Interesting thought, but we should all look at such things with eyes wide open. Such legal battles would be a bold legal battle that would take years to resolve in the courts during which the certification would be stripped from the clinicians involved. Also the more basic fight is with the corrupt AMA who will strip their ability to practice as medical dog catcher.
So, it’s not that there aren’t steps and judicial fights to contest these autocratic organizations and their attempts to control physicians with their over-reaching dictates, it’s that there are real world consequences to having these accreditation stripped from you. There are people such as Dr. McCullough who have placed themselves at the forefront of this battle, and perhaps they will go after such accomplished authorities as he and Malone or Cole. But the little fish, like the clinician out of Med school but a short time, who have massive debt still lingering, they will be destroyed.
And victory in court is not a foregone certainty let alone even obtaining a fair trial – don’t forget the courts are as corrupt as the Congress, or need I mention the Flynn case where the judge would not allow the prosecution to drop charges or the Roger Stone case where the forewoman was a Dem operative and political candidate(what are the chances)…This would be an another such highly, politically charged and sensitive court drama with a considerable political consequence to be determined with the outcome.
It would be a real question in my mind if it would be successful given the current political environment, forget someone less well established as he. In truth, I believe the ABEM’s move coming so closely following that made by the AMA suggests they might be anticipating some action against the growing number of physicians supporting early treatment, but if this is true, it will likely be against more than just a few doctors. A class action law suit would be in order, but again, the more severe the action by these established institutions, the more established would be my opinion that the resolution of such a case would already have been arranged.
@peloni
Let them stipulate.
ABEM, etc., are a bunch of non-profits.
What prevents the other doctors from establishing an alternative ABEM, AMA, etc.?
If the ”guild” objects, sue them under the Sherman Antitrust Act [which] “declared every contract, combination, and conspiracy in restraint of trade to be illegal”.
The organization that issues Board-Certification for Emergency Medicine(ABEM) is now stipulating that a doctor must
So the CDC, the AMA and now the ABEM are all taking the prescription pad out of the control of the practicing physician who is seeing patients.
Here is their statement
Koch’s Postulates cannot be used for viruses.
In the year 1890 no one knew about viruses.
Viruses could not even be seen ’til the early 1930’s because the microscopes were not powerful enough.
Overall, the author may be correct but he should have been more careful with info.
From today’s Jerusalem Post:
I guess everyone ( 500,000 + in the US) who died from this actually died from constipation. They were full of crap, just like this article.