As Vaccines Continue to Not Work as Promised – Ivermectin Continues to Work

GATEWAY PUNDIT

It’s time the world begins to seriously look at Ivermectin.

The Gateway Pundit has reported on the FDA and CDC’s suppression of repurposed medications Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. We’ve also reported on India’s miraculous results incorporating both medications.

Are effective COVID medications like Ivermectin being suppressed because they could cause vaccines to lose government funding?

Here’s a shocking comparison between Israel, that’s one of the most vaccinated countries on the planet, compared to India with one of the lowest vaccination rates and is treating with Ivermectin.

And now there’s more data from Africa showing the undeniable results.  It seems as though Africa has now surpassed the U.S. in its ability to follow the science and apply it.  It’s important to point out the graphs presented are from John Hopkins.

This morning, Tokyo Medical Association announced publicly that it is recommending that all doctors begin treating COVID with Ivermectin after witnessing the results from other countries. Japan has a very conservative culture and the same extends to the country’s practice of medicine. Here is the video press release:

While countries from the third world to the most medically advanced in the world are smart enough to use a medication that is safe, approved, available, cheap and works better than the vaccine to save lives, our FDA is presenting the life-saving medication this way:

In a deceptive attempt to sabotage and mislabel, FDA’s page on Ivermectin presents the medication as one for animals with a picture of a horse.

Some may say this is in response to recent reports of people attempting to self-medicate with animal Ivermectin. However, the FDA’s propaganda page conflating Ivermectin with a horse has been up for months before those reports.

While there is a version used to treat animals, antibiotics are also separately formulated to treat people as well. Animals get the animal medicine and people get the people medicine.

To clarify, Ivermectin has won the Nobel Prize for medicine in 2015 and is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines. Prescribed to over 3.5 Billion people, Ivermectin has one of the best and longest safety profiles in the history of medicine.

The rest of the world appears to be catching on to the fact that following the United States is sadly not necessarily the safest and best bet it once was.  Undoubtedly for very good reason.

September 3, 2021 | 8 Comments »

Leave a Reply

8 Comments / 8 Comments

  1. I have mentioned the effects in Peru by IVM previously, but Dr. Malone has a penchant for brevity that is quite effective:

    This says it all: “During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002.

    For those that don't know, Peru did a massive campaign with ivermectin in last half of 2020. The mortality dropped 14 fold over 3 months. A new president came in – and stopped the campaign. And deaths rose 13 fold over the next month. This figure is from: https://t.co/1Zvbi9LdPi?amp=1

    Here is the source article :
    Ivermectin: a multifaceted drug of Nobel prize-honoured distinction with indicated efficacy against a new global scourge, COVID-19

  2. IVM is mislabled as being “horse medication” with “unknown effects” when given to Covid patients. The truth is that it is a mainstay medication and one of three drugs dispensed as top tier medication(the others being penicillin and aspirin). The reports of people calling the poison control over IVM is to confirm the dosaging after hearing reports of its questionable harms. The truth is that IVM has an very wide safe dosing range, ie slight increases in the dosage is not assocaiated with any harm. The drug is extremely safe product and the multitude of treatment usages is well established, and this includes Covid – check the meta-data analysis by Dr. Lawrie and another by Kory. In 40yrs it has been associated with 6 deaths world wide, while the safe and effective vax have been associated with over 13,000 deaths in 9months. The duplicity and criminal misinformation is costing lives. And yes, the CDC is well aware of all of this. They are the ones who are mandating that IVM be given to every single Afghani prior to entry into the US, both ally and terrorist alike, will be treated. No worries about having to perform CPR after treatment, unlike the vax, so it is safe to treat them on the plane coming over.

  3. There are now 113 studies that show that Ivermectin improve the outcome a patient. Of these, 73 have been peer reviewed and 63 included a control group. There were 31 Randomized Control Trials included among these results as well. The studies in total involved the use of over 26,000 patients. When are they going to accept this information as being significant?

  4. @Jacobite
    The vaccines were issued under an Emergency Use Authorization. So their use is on an emergency basis only and it is due to there being no other available treatment. That EUA is null and void if there is any other effective treatment. So if the HCQ cocktail or the IVM coctail or any treatment was accepted as a valid, ie effective treatment, the vax would have to wait until they were approved to allow there use to be administered, by law.

  5. Is it true that one of the requirements for an emergency approval for the vaccines was that no effective treatment is available?

  6. No mandates for British Children.

    For the vast majority of children, SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and will resolve without treatment. Of the very few children aged 12 to 15 years who require hospitalisation, the majority have underlying health conditions. The committee has recommended the expansion of the list of conditions to which the offer applies for at-risk 12 to 15 year olds.

    There is evidence of an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and myocarditis. This is an extremely rare adverse event. The medium- to long-term effects are unknown and long-term follow-up is being conducted.

    Given the very low risk of serious COVID-19 disease in otherwise healthy 12 to 15 year olds, considerations on the potential harms and benefits of vaccination are very finely balanced and a precautionary approach was agreed.

    Sometimes it is best not to be first in line.

  7. I suggest that someone take a serious look at the PCR tests being run at cycles as high as 40 or more, thereby producing nearly all false positives. Test samples sent to a dozen labs will return a dozen different results. I suspect most of the spike in “cases” is due to shedding by vaccinated people, who carry a heavy viral load.

  8. This video is very important for anyone who doubts the use of IVM with Covid.

    Dr. Lawrie is the head of a WHO consultancy group, who has done a complete review of the data(called meta-data analysis) on IVM which was released in June noting a moderate-high confidence of IVM’s use in Covid treatment. In the video below she provides a review of the WHO’s own data review on IVM and explains how their review was very different from her own. I have some quotes from the video with the time stamps for those who don’t have the interest to watch this interview, but if you think IVM is not safe, or if you think that WHO, FDA, CDC, England, France, Australia, South Africa and others are making wise judgements based on the data available, this will be an informing video for you to watch.

    Here are her statements:

    Interviewer: They are actually putting the data in front of you and misstating it –

    Lawrie: You start questioning yourself because you think to yourself am I seeing things[36min]
    ….

    Lawrie: Doesn’t matter what you add to it or what you subtract from it[IVM] because it reduces deaths by alot [38min]
    ….

    Lawrie: I cant believe that one would ever need any more studies based on this even though there are studies ongoing [39min]
    ….

    Lawrie: [Safety data comparison on IVM against Remdisivir and vax in a chart very revealing] 42min
    ….

    Lawrie: 4-6 wks after IVM death rates drop off(in countris that employ country-wide IVM)
    ….

    Lawrie: Other drugs are under EUA based on the fact they may be effective but IVM we certainly have more evidence than may be effective – we know that it’s probably very effective [46min]
    ….

    Lawrie: Many things not taken into consideration with WHO analyiss against IVM [47min]
    ….

    Lawrie: Ours is the most thorough and comprehensive meta-analysis [48min]
    ….

    Lawrie: It just looks like these organizations are cherry picking what studies they want to use in their reviews but they all agree upon is[a study] showing no difference in the very mild patients, so there is something very peculiar on [49min]

    Here is her video… Very compelling and difficult to challenge
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQkoL2l3-gg