by: Ethan Huff, NATURAL NEWS July 13, 2021
(Natural News) The vast majority of people who are getting injected for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) will die within a few short years from heart failure, warns Dr. Charles Hoffe, M.D., a medical practitioner in British Columbia, Canada.
In one of his latest updates, Dr. Hoffe explains that he is observing in his patients who took an mRNA (messenger RNA) “vaccine” from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna that their capillaries are now plugging up, which he says will eventually lead to a serious cardiovascular event.
Chinese Virus mRNA shots are programmed to turn a person’s body into a spike protein “factory,” and Dr. Hoffe says that over time these mass-produced spike proteins cause progressive blood clotting.
No fewer than 60 percent of people who take an mRNA injection will suffer from these blood clots – and in the end, an overwhelming majority will end up six feet under due to the damage caused.
“We now know that only 25 percent of the ‘vaccine’ injected into a person’s arm actually stays in your arm,” Dr. Hoffe explains one his blog.
“The other 75 percent is collected by your lymphatic system and literally fed into your circulation so these little packages of messenger RNA, and by the way in a single dose of Moderna ‘vaccine’ there are literally 40 trillion mRNA molecules.”
Dr. Hoffe says that while these packages were designed by Big Pharma to be absorbed directly into people’s cells, the only place they can actually be absorbed is around the blood vessels and into capillary networks, which are the tiniest blood vessels where blood flow is slow and where genes are released.
“Your body then gets to work reading and then manufacturing trillions and trillions of these spike proteins,” he says.
“Each gene can produce many, many spike proteins. The body then recognizes these are foreign bodies so it makes antibodies against it so you are then protected against COVID. That’s the idea.”
https://www.naturalnews.com/
>
<
>
mRNA injections insert “spiky bits” into blood vessels, eventually causing heart failure
“So, when the platelet comes through the capillary it suddenly hits all these COVID spikes and it becomes absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form to block that vessel,” he writes.
“Therefore, these spike proteins can predictably cause blood clots. They are in your blood vessels (if mRNA ‘vaccinated’) so it is guaranteed.”
It turns out that these blood clots are different than the “rare” ones spoken about on the media that show up on CT scans and MRIs. These are microscopic and do not show up on tests, as they can only be detected using a blood test known as D-dimer.
Dr. Hoffe has been performing D-dimer tests on his mRNA “vaccinated” patients, which led him to discover that at least 62 percent of them have these microscopic blood clots.
“The most alarming part of this is that there are some parts of the body like the brain, spinal cord, heart and lungs which cannot [regenerate],” he says. “When those tissues are damaged by blood clots, they are permanently damaged.”
To learn more about the dangers and ineffectiveness of Chinese Virus injections, be sure to check out ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
@peloni
It was a general statement and it had nothing to do with you.
I like for things to make sense, and this is what logically follows from the worst case scenario about the spike protein (in case it is correct).
As far as “treatments” in this case.
The “vaccine” messes with human genetic material which is never advisable considering that the so-called scientists will always know a hell of a lot less than actually exists out there, and, therefore, will never be able to predict the long-term results of what they are doing.
The “vaccine” forces the cells of the recipient to produce a certain abnormal protein endlessly (as far as we know).
The only true treatment for this (in case this protein is truly dangerous) would be something that stops this effect of the “vaccine” (i.e., the creation of the protein).
The next best thing would be something that does not stop the process of the protein creation but removes the protein itself from the body (at who knows what health costs to the patient).
Both of the above treatments obviously defeat the whole alleged purpose of the “vaccine” and even to develop them is to confess to a complete failure and danger of the “vaccine” (do not expect anybody to go that far because it would be like confessing to a crime against humanity).
The good news for the criminals would be that even the worst case scenario will not point to the vaccine (in case they keep their mouths shut and pretend everything is fine and dandy).
The bad news for them would be that if that protein sheds, they themselves, in effect, have just committed suicide.
Please, don’t respond to this.
(2 of 2)
The Glutathione pathway is tipped towards being inactivated by the spike protein binding to the ACE2 receptor. Spike is known to causes a number of responses, but let’s keep it simple and just summarize that the Glutathione pathway is diminished. What remains of this pathway can easily become overwhelmed. So anything to support it is a blessing and an aid to the immune systems. I believe they sell glutathione supplements, but I am not familiar with these, so ask your doctor. Support for the glutathione pathway could be gained by supplementing the basic nutrients and cofactors involved in the pathway. Here are a few of these(again consult your doctor):
NAC
P5P
Glutamine
Glycine
Selenium
Vitamin C & E
Vitamin B-6, B-9, B-12, and Biotin
Green leafy vegetables are a good source of sulfur, and some of the above nutrients as well. In fact, all these nutrients can be obtained by eating specific foods rather than using vitamin supplementation. You can find the foods rich in these nutrients with a quick online search. Again, I would contact your doctor before taking any supplementation. At some point the spike protein production from the vaccines will stop, and victory will had, hopefully.
Regarding the issue of shedding, we don’t know that shedding occurs. It may, and some have stated that it does, but I have yet to see anything to support this as factually known. There are stories where one unvaccinated teen who visits two friends who were recently vaccinated, and the unvaccinated child began showing symptoms of Covid disease. Well, from a scientific approach, this is pretty weak evidence. Until I find better information to the fact that shedding occurs, I remain skeptical. I will note that the Pharma groups intended to test in the RCT trials for the presence of shedding, but wound up not collecting the data that would support or refute the shedding issue – this is the most concerning point that I have seen in referencing shedding that gave me cause for concern.
I don’t mean to minimize the concerns I have over the virus/vaccines as many people have died. Yet, there is much that can be put in place to provide a very successful treatment of the virus. Much of that may be employed to successfully combat the vaccines, we can only suspect that if the spike is the damaging element in the SARS-Cov2 virus, a similar treatment may help treat the vaccine to some extent prior to injury. Though I have yet to hear a word on this topic as being confirmed, it has been suggested. Beyond the treatments, the nutrition, and I have to admit I really hate the topic of nutrition, is a very important tool in the fight against SARS-Cov2 and any adverse effects of the vaccines. Let me know if something isn’t clear. Oh, and also, as you said
/2
(1 of 2)
@Reader
If the ‘some people’ referenced here is me, as I suspect it is, I would like to respond. I would never make this statement and, frankly, I do not believe it is true. The virus and the vaccines are each quite concerning, but if we keep our heads, improve our health and hold to our faith, I believe there are few things that are impossible. Of course, some things can not be overcome, but this is not been described by me, in any case, to be the situation with the virus or the vaccine. The virus is very treatable, and by extrapolating this fact to the vaccines, prior to significant injury, it is likely these treatments might be beneficial as well.
One thing to gain a benefit, which can not be cited too strongly, is the reduction of stress. It’s not easy, I know, but it is essential. Stress in our lives causes the release of a chemical in our bodies that shuts down the immune system and impairs our ability to adapt to difficult situations on a cellular level. In the past year, everything elicits more and more stress in our live but it is very important to reduce it as much as possible, and exercise is good tool towards this end.
Also, I have been harping for some time about the ability to treat the SARS-Cov2 virus with very useful treatments. As to the vaccine, there is a benefit in that it is made of the same thing that triggers the Covid disease. At some point, hopefully, the vaccinated injection will stop making spike. Til then the body needs support. The body’s immune system is capable of many miraculous, and I don’t use that term casually or often, responses to foreign invaders. While the body is reacting to the spike from the vaccines or the SARS-Cov2 virus, the immune system is using up many of it’s basic materials and if these are not replenished, well, the guns go silent, so to speak. Lets phrase this differently: The human body is a marvel of controls and counter controls, and the ability to fight off disease is innate to each of us, but it does require the proper nutrients. Everyone should consult their physician for advise to fortify the immune system to this end.
There are many nutriticeuticals that will support the immune system which had up until about 2 months ago been over the counter in the US, but, now, the FDA has seen fit to require these be available by prescription only. One major determinant of surviving Covid is having proper Vitamin D levels. This is generated in the body normally with sunlight, so outdoor exercises are helpful, but sometimes this needs supplementation – careful too much is not good, FYI. Also there is the Glutathione pathway(very interesting biochemical defense system) that Michael has spoken of on a few occasions. This is involve in a number of benefits/uses to the body including
antioxidant pathway
detoxification of drugs or toxins
cancer apoptosis(cell death)
proper protein generation
cofactor to some enzymes
There are probably other uses for it that don’t occur to me at the moment, but it is a very important to the body.
/1
If that spike protein is as dangerous as some people say its and if the vaccinated people shed it, then we are all doomed.
No discussion in the world will fix it.
Let’s just pray a lot, I guess.
(2 of 2)
The study that you shared here is an observational study. As I discussed with Adam a couple of days ago, there are different levels of studies, as most are probably aware. This observational study is a low data collection study that is designed to draw an inference of some observed action(like how many housemates contract the disease) to some level of confidence(they showed a statistically significant difference in this one). It is good that this study showed a impact on the transmission but it is only one study and though its more useful than the RCTs supporting the EUA, it is not capable of being interpreted as being as meaningful as the RCT. It is a useful data set and will add to a growing number of these cheaply designed studies that will cumulatively demonstrate something, but we have yet to know what that will be til many hundreds and thousands of such reports are demonstrated to support the findings in this study or refute it. A few things stand out in the data collected in this study. Among these, the most alarming point is that they demonstrated teens/adults in unvaccinated homes contract the disease at a rate of between 2x-4X higher than what was previously seen in studies over the past year – this is an alarming figure if accurate(they postulate the reason as being related to variants, but the accuracy of this new revelation, which is well increased, would clearly impact the conclusions of this study). The limitations of the study include the affects following the second dose of vaccine for which the sample size is too small and so it has an increased level of uncertainty, as noted in the study’s findings. The impact of the second shot would be the more significant value to know, but again the data set here is too small. It should also be noted that the study is a pre-print, i.e. there has been no peer review on this report, for a better understanding of the benefits of peer review, I would refer you to the discussion I had with Adam on this topic in some detail 2 days ago.
So, this is how scientific data is collected, however, one study at a time – with each study showing a hair on the back of a dog, but the full picture or even a closer picture of reality can not be gained from one hair or one study. The inferences gained by the demonstration of results such as this study will inform the medical community and lead them towards a conclusion with additional studies.
Scientific data collection is painstakingly slow and one study is just one study, and every study may be flawed in data collection or interpretation of the data collected or bias. And each study will give input that further studies will pursue to test other hypothesis and may support or differ with this or some other study’s data. This is why the RCT was so critically important, and when none of the vaccines held any statistically significant difference with the general population during world wide outbreaks, well, let’s just say that it was unfortunate. We will have to seek support for the value in these dangerous vaccines one study at a time, but the preponderance of data will be better appreciated at some point in the future with better and stronger and more numerous studies.
If you will bear with me a moment further, there is some good inferences beyond the data to draw from the actual study you cited. As background they demonstrate that they only found 2 studies that considered housemate transmission in the past year relating to the current outbreak. It is devastating that this sort of collection has not been pursued more diligently than this. There are now 3 studies world wide to consider the impact of transmission in a household while whole nations have been essentially innoculated by these experimental vaccines. It has been 6 months, so we will see what comes out in the next month or two, but it is alarming that there has been no data shared to this point. It should be noted that this current study looked at 210 households, which is a good enough sample size to gain some inferences but all. Yet, it has been six months…Israel has had a limitation on their caseload, but the world has not…where exactly is the data supporting the effect on transmission of the vaccines. Why are there only 3 studies looking at this. Data collection takes time and perhaps there will be a flood of such studies next month, but there is a lot of $$ behind Pharma now, and the model proposed here seems cheaply pursued. Why are we not pursuing these and more challenging(means more expensive and greater information collected) studies to consider the interpretation of the vaccines when their RCTs showed no statistically significant difference. Many questions easily come to mind. There really should be a greater set of data than 3 studies on this by now.
/2
(1 of 2)
So, again a couple of things that are to be highlighted and distinguished.
First, the point I made on effectiveness was not clearly stated. To be clear, and I should have made this better understood, the fact that the underlying data collected from the RCT study that won the EAU authorization held no statistically significant difference between the vaccinated and placebo groups does not mean that it was not effective, only that their evidence did not prove that it was. In the middle of last fall’s outbreaks, the vaccine studies failed to actually be challenged enough to collect good data, ie no one in either group was affected by the outbreaks. So the 95% effectiveness was not proven accurate because the data was useless to show anything. Last fall the outbreaks were quite significant. With this in mind, and I mean no disrespect to the studies, but it does beg the question of how the placebo groups in the middle of the widespread outbreaks last summer/fall there were only 162 people who became ill out of 17,511 people in just the placebo group. Since there was no challenge, they might have spent their money, and it was a lot of money, on how many daisies might grow in a random field….there was no usefulness to their findings.
So the 95% effective value was not proven accurate to a statistical significant level. This sounds like so much double talk to most, but it has real implications. The RCT was conducted and shared with the world and still is today to represent the idea the vaccines work, and that they prove to be 95% effective. Yet, this RCT study showed nothing as the data was “garbage data” as the inventor of the mRNA vaccines put it so aptly. The data is more useless than I have shown here, and should anyone care to understand the statistical interpretations better, I can go further, but I think I made my point well enough to better explain the useless nature of the 95% effective value – it doesn’t show a 0% effectiveness, just that it doesn’t show anything and they state this clearly in each of the vaccine EUA documentations(I gave the specifics in Phiser, but I can provide the info on each of the others demonstrating the same flawed support of the 95% claims).
There have been studies that indicate some level of protectivity of the vaccines, and the best that I have seen to this point has been a study that looked at the risk-benefit ratio that I shared here in May or June. The problem with it was that it was a retrospective study and it did not show a specific indication of the effectiveness, just that it was effective to some impact. It was a retrospective study, so this further limits the interpretative value, but again it was not designed or intended to replace the RCT, any more than the study you found reported in TOI.
/1
https://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-study-claims-vaccines-cut-infection-risk-even-in-covid-afflicted-homes/?utm_source=The+Daily+Edition&utm_campaign=daily-edition-2021-07-19&utm_medium=email
(2 of 2)
The final point I would call attention to is the fact that the vaccine was suppose to be a vaccine, not a treatment. In other words, it was suppose to prevent the disease, not limit its effects. In fact, it is clearly causing adverse reactions, but this is not my point here, so let us ignore the adverse events for the moment. They are claiming the vaccine is limiting the extent of the disease, but this is not preventing the disease. Recall the claims of 95% effective, where is that figure? Well, the data collected in the report claiming the 95% effective rating for which the FDA allowed the EUA has a chi square statistic of 1.3561 and the p-value is .244218 which is not significant at p<0.05. This means that their finding of 95% effectiveness held no statistically significant difference between their vaccinated and placebo groups. To demonstrate that the FDA recognized this fact, page 41 of the Phizer EUA documents includes a clause stating:
They are, of course, referring to the deaths in the study and they accept that the deaths found in the vaccinated group showed no statistically significant difference from the general population. Indeed, if the 95% claim were true, there would be no limitation of symptoms, ie death, it would be protective. The disease would not be present in patients and over time it would disappear. This did not happen.
Well, we have to take what is placed before us and hence the vaccines are not succeeding as suggested. So now they should be used as a psuedo-treatment, but the adverse reactions that I suggested we ignore earlier to examine the vaccine’s effectiveness, can not be ignored permanently. There is no reason to suspect additional dosages of this vaccine would not carry additional adverse reactions. And as has been known since early last year, there are safe, significant treatments preventing serious disease, especially if prophylaxis is employed to prevent the establishment of disease – the Indian data clearly demonstrates this fact.
/2
(1 of 2)
@Ted
So, a couple of things to address here. First, the deaths. If you look at the data(I have come to hate hearing this phrase) from January, it shows that the death rate increased dramatically, peaking in the second week of Jan., following the administration of the vaccines at the end of Dec. Whole nursing homes were affected with members of the staff reporting massive deaths among their population – I recall the report of one care giver relating that their entire nursing home had experienced a near complete depopulation following the shot. Now, such anecdotal reports must be accepted as no more supportive than the data would allow them, but the data was devastating. This has held true wherever the vaccines were applied.
To be clear, I was impressed with the level of quiet that was obtained in Israel after April where the active cases were less than 1,000. But the January die off could have concentrated the deaths of those who would have been susceptible to the disease in the coming months, kind of burning off the debris on the forest floor – recall that that SARS-Cov2 does not kill everyone, just those with significant established diseases, and usually more than one. Also, since January there has been some treatment being pursued by rogue physicians following Dr. McCullough’s campaign towards this goal – I will admit, however, that I think the issue of treatment is unrelated to the decrease death rate since I believe most doctors are adhering to FDA guidelines, still it should be noted as a possible input with some influence, to whatever degree physicians are treating their patients since the treatments are very effective. So, we can assume that the spike innoculations are working such that they limit deaths, but that would be an assumption not proven, as we could easily assume that the most vulnerable who were susceptible have been removed from the equation, so to speak.
In any case, viruses will mutate with time as an adaptive measure under evolutionary pressures to develop less lethal outcomes in a process known as attenuation. Viruses undergo attenuation as they mutate and become less virulent, and the severity of disease is lessened. It is often described as an evolutionary process whereby the virus has mutated in a way that selects for a coexistence between itself and the host. This attenuation process could be influenced by the vaccines with the full population treatment with these spike protein inoculations causing the virus to mutate so that the spike is no longer being affected by the vaccine. The information I have seen suggests that the population being affected of late is actually split between vaccinated and unvaccinated with the vaccinated having a larger share of the disease over time. We can not know what would have happened had the vaccine not been administered, this is why placebo groups are used in drug studies.
/1
@Adam
Here is Dr. McCullough speaking of his determination to support his patients and his father. It is a short video which relates to my recent response to the threat posed to doctors treating patients and McCollough’s call to physicians to do “the right thing”.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1409120979226447873
Can we at least agree that overall deaths from covid have dropped dramatically once the vaccinations started?
CDC reports;
“Reports of death after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. More than 334 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through July 12, 2021. During this time, VAERS received 6,079 reports of death (0.0018%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. FDA requires healthcare providers to report any death after COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS, even if it’s unclear whether the vaccine was the cause. Reports of adverse events to VAERS following vaccination, including deaths, do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused a health problem. A review of available clinical information, including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records, has not established a causal link to COVID-19 vaccines. However, recent reports indicate a plausible causal relationship between the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine and TTS, a rare and serious adverse event—blood clots with low platelets—which has caused deaths.”
@Michael
Thank you for the added descriptions, as your metaphors will likely garner a much greater appreciation by most, I think. It is a terribly difficult thing to describe these matters, and likely twice as difficult to understand them, without a proper context which your use of metaphors lends itself quite well.
(4 of 4)
As is true in business and other things, the result of these threats will be seen to be significantly influenced by simple geography. For instance, Dr. McCullough and Dr. Urso and Dr. Immanuel were each to face licensing measures that were launched, pursued and defeated before the Texas Licensing Board. Not all would prevail with the success that these notable Texan clinicians were able to secure, as you saw with Dr. Simone Gold and Dr. Hoffe.
These many clinicians’ bold steps bring to mind the sense of fortitude and resistance to administrative oppression that are not uniquely familiar when thinking about the physician in whom each of us place our trust to pursue our health to the best of their abilities, their trade trains them to simply interpret disease symptoms and prescribe treatment managements. Indeed, I suspect many clinicians were not up to the task of facing the threats and consequences demonstrated by the behemoth of these state authorities which are described here.
And then, also, the prescriptions that were placed by these physicians would become a point of further review where some pharmacist held the authority to judge Covid treatments tantamount to prescribing OxyContin(highly addictive opioid) without just cause. Hence, the threats endured and the bold nature of the clinicians were rewarded with these doctors having endured everything described here to no end, as their patient was unable to gain the benefit of his clinical judgement in spite of his every effort. So the public went home for one reason or another, with too great a regularity, to sit and suffer as an incubator of their miserable fate. The two weeks would pass and the viral factories will have created their harm in these patients and in any that might have been infected by an association with the individual harboring this brewing viral storm.
One day, it may be resolved as to how the plague was made or manipulated, if it was purposefully released or accidentally escaped, as outbreaks never fail to provide an interesting tale. Following the outbreak, however, we know full well many steps that were employed to support the spread of this plague through the captured management of at least the US supervisory agencies, whose actions reveal that the spread of the virus was monitored, maintained and made certain by these captured institutions of authority who can claim no ignorance of their capital crimes against the world’s population towards some unstated goal. Many will bristle to hear these stories, and I find them harder to write than many will find them to read, but these stories that are told in this posting are supported by testimonies, many under oath, of the many clinicians that I have referenced here, among many others. The injury that has been dealt by these villains and their indefensible actions is beyond any fair compensation as it is beyond any possible treatment, and yet, it should not be seen that they are beyond any fair judgement. The terrible implications of these matters require a sense of resolution that incorporates justice and accountability, in as far as such parameters might be rendered. Quite simply, they must be seen to bear a consequence for the many crimes they have reaped upon us all.
/4
(3 of 4)
Should the FDA not have made that statement, pursuits would have been made by every doctor towards the benefit of their charges and society as a whole. The pandemic would have been crushed into our memories before the first scores of deaths were suffered in not months, not weeks, but days following the world wide shut down. How can I say this, one might ask? Good question, as it seems too bold a statement to be easily supported. The simple and terrible answer to this good question is, in fact, that I can say this because it this is exactly what was accomplished.
Dr. Zalenko, had begun his treatment studies in February and in ten days following the 14 days to stop the spread, he published his findings of what would be the means to stop the spread, if that had, indeed, been the intent of the shutdown. He was, of course, not alone in his inquiries as Dr. Fleming, of the Fleming Method fame, among many others had been pursuing treatment investigations since early January. Medicine is a challenging field of study in which every clinician plays a role in pursuing a significant benefit to society. This is what medicine looks like when actually practiced and while it is not proscribed by political pursuits. Unfortunately, many things have taken root within society which have held an inappropriate authority over the proper management of this recent plague, rendering the sum total of the world’s clinicians incapable of employing any treatment regime in spite of having developed an initial treatment within hours of the alarm being raised.
When the FDA issued their fatwah on treatments, it precluded any further attempts at treatment or investigations towards any curative agent. A doctor could not even suggest the use of monoclonal antibodies, something that was developed for this very disease, unless the patient first inquired. Of course, this is not to say that none strayed from the intended preclusions mandated by the CDC. Many did. Physicians, great and small, and their actions carry a great benefit to those they treated, as well as a great burden to themselves and their families. To prove that there was no misunderstanding being misinterpreted, the hospitals reacted to these clinicians and staff with threats and terminations. The medical boards sent out license review notices to further support this terror within the medical community to those who persisted against this threat. There was no mistake, no misunderstanding. Their intent was certain and their threats were pursued to the limit of the medical licensing review boards and the authority of the hospital or clinical administrations, each of which held a control on the clinicians’ income and future.
/3
(2 of 4)
How did they do it? How could so many professionals whose devotion to their patients and their personal calling be managed and controlled against their natural will. Well, the physicians are each required to pass an exam for which they study quite diligently while in medical school. I am of course referring to the medical examination boards which offers and authorizes the ability to practice to the individuals who survive the unkind rigors of both their teaching and clinical preparations towards being allowed to practice medicine. The testing is quite intimidating and challenging to pass. It is a requirement of each physician to complete this task to fulfill their intended dreams of aiding their community and making their mark upon this field.
With this in mind, it is essential that the clinician not run afoul of their licensing board or suffer any threat to their licensure. Politics anywhere is much like politics everywhere and as such there are unpleasant applications in every organization where authority is held by some governing body over the rest. Yet, to my knowledge at least, these matters were never before turned towards such cynical practices as was established with this barbarous intent of fashioning and shaping medical thought and medical concerns and medical research and then, medical treatment.
Actions by the FDA prevented any treatment to the people as they were diagnosed using experimental and oversensitive PCR tests. Once someone chose to take the test, their results were reported utilizing an overly sensitive testing regime that provided many tens to hundreds of thousands of false positives, perhaps millions. Once the patient was stated to be ‘positive’ the doctor was forced to relate to their patient that there was nothing to be done for them, go home, self isolate among your family or in some isolated dwelling for two weeks and return when you are too ill to easily treat.
The isolation time provided the incubation period in which the SARS-Cov2 cooked its way into the body’s infrastructure and forced their human hosts to produce the dreaded spike protein with which we have all become too well familiar. The instruction to go home and wait out this incubation period was a deep betrayal of the medical support that should have been provided. I don’t mean to suggest that their was a sinister cabal of licensed physicians who intentionally abandoned their oaths and their patients. They were forced under a significant threat to do so by the FDA providing the stated stipulation that there was no authorized treatment. It seems a reasonable statement without the threat that I suggest was held within its lettering, but the threat was not just real and tangible, it was leveled at the practicing clinicians livelihood, which provided for their family, their lifestyle, and their debt payment on their education which is quite a sum to replace.
/2
(1 of 4)
@Adam,
Adam, your interest in these matters seems not to have been dulled by my lengthy answer, so forgive me if I respond, once again with a similarly lengthy response. Though it is unfortunate that these questions are not easily relatable to simple answers, and even though we are incapable of reasoning the why of many things, we may be very sure of something of the how – the untoward practices I will relate here will encompass the unfortunate reasons for why the vaccines were needed, and, also, why so many now lie in their graves when they should be at home with their families. It is a very disturbing world in which we find ourselves suffering a world-wide power-grab amid a pandemic in which a terribly flawed treatment is pursued in the form of a psuedo-vaccine/innoculant.
It is in the context of these matters that these power hungry statists have managed and manipulated a source of censoring about the world in which it is now impossible to read of the random curious thoughts of some housewife on the other end of the world, or even on the other end of the city block, based upon their expression of unsanctioned thoughts. An obvious extension of this limit upon the thoughts of some housewife, given to recording in a journal fashion things that might be seen as threatening to the state, would have a bearing on the distribution of such valued information between clinicians desirous of defeating a pandemic that is the basis for the power-grab and coup related above.
With this in mind, I will tell you that there are likely thousands of physicians if not more, who have received some level of threat, review, suspension, and termination of there practice or even the ability to pursue any employment in the medical field at all. And those who felt no direct heat from this fire, could not find the blinders to prevent them seeing the illuminating harm demonstrated on their significant colleagues. It was the Twiter purge applied to the medical staff of great institutions and the great medical research minds who fell prey to such invaluably flawed application of the motto ‘might makes right’, as it was to prove to be much worse than wrong, more deadly than the entirety of the victims of the 1967 pandemic – yes, for the many who are unaware, amid the Vietnam War, the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, and the Summer of Love, the world suffered from a world pandemic in 1967, in which some ~4 million souls perished world wide, and the number of which is now less than the victims associated with this recent Wuhan plague.
/1
Thanks for the input, Peloni. You brought back memories, talking about protein subunits. The “crumpled paper” analogy is significant, though, as you say, few will understand it. I like to compare proteins as tools, like, for instance, a crescent wrench / shifting spanner. Proteins can facilitate reactions that would not happen without them. The “tool” analogy, is comparing trying to thread a nut onto a bolt with a crescent wrench, vs. trying to do it by throwing a box of nuts at a box of bolts. The “wrench” method succeeds, where the “throwing” method fails.
Proteins, as you know, are simply long chains (called “peptide chains”) of combinations of amino acids. These amino acids can also individually form important chemicals in the body (such as adenosine, which is a component of ATP, or adenosine triphosphate), or produce short-chain polymers such as glutathione, which I mentioned elsewhere as an important player in preventing or reversing the toxicity of the COVID vaccine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glutathione
The reader can get the gist of what a protein chain looks like, by looking at glutathione. Proteins are much longer chains, consisting of thousands upon thousands of amino acids, each one counting as a “dalton”, the unit used in measuring them.
The “tool” parts of proteins, their “screwdrivers” and “wrenches”, etc., are produced by functional groups such as imine, thiol and hydroxyl, on the amino acid subunits. When the protein is properly “crumpled”, as you say, into its functional shape, these groups work with one another to hold target molecules in place and operate on them. Usually proteins will consist of various subunits, like hemoglobin, for example
https://www.pngwing.com/en/free-png-isaoi
I hope this makes things clearer for the readers.
Many thanks, Peloni, for taking my inquiries about Dr. Hoffe’s opinions seriously, and responding to my inquiries in detail. I now understand the issues involved much better than before.
I still think the concerns of a physician who is competent in his field and who treats patients on a daily basis about any medicine or vaccine should be given some weight by someone trying to decide whether to undergo a medical procedure, including vaccination. This is because the concerns of an experienced clinician with a regular medical practice could turn out to be well founded, although they may also be proven to be completely wrong by subsequent research and accurate statistics.
I must say I am utterly shocked by Edgar’s report that Dr. Hoffe has been penalized by the medical authorities by having his hospital “privileges removed, depriving him of half his income. A doctor should never be penalized for expressing dissident or minority opinions about the safety or lack of it of a medicine or vaccine, or any other medical issue. Such silencing of dissent by punishing minority opinions of physicians makes it utterly impossible for doctors to challenge medical and/or political “orthodoxy.” But medical and political orthodoxy about the effectiveness or safety of certain treatments has frequently been proven to be incorrect by subsequent medical research. Penalizing doctors financially or in other ways just because they have expressed a minority opinion about a medical matter could make serious medical research impossible in the future, and cause dangerous treatments to remain in use for years.
I would be very interested in Peloni’s opinion concerning Edgar’s report.
@Edgar
Yes, I have been following Dr. Hoffe since his first interview. I have been waiting to see his data released, but still just his interviews. Given his limited cases, I wonder if we will ever see the details of his concerns.
It is good that you have your daughter to keep you advised of matters. There is no reward that can replace family – in times of safety, they are the greatest treasure, and in times of concern, they are an immeasurable source of support. Such valued items are beyond the price of nations. Her report is The First Peoples had a great disadvantage in dealing with the SARS-Cov2 virus last year. I suspect this will likely be the case with the vaccines as well. Though in truth, who could be certain as their is no common discussion to be had on such things as our good politburo dispatches the long arm of Censoring demons over the populace.
It is a sad moment that we must suffer these champions of silence empowered by these state officios who have forgotten the value and limits of their employment being to their public. It should never be forgotten, though it is often ignored, that when bureaucrats outgrow the limits of their authority and grow new arms of leverage upon their public, they take on the role of tyrants, regardless of their good or ill intent. And by extension of self-empowering move of theirs, as they raise themselves to the level of tyrants, we are thereby lowered to the position of slaves. It is intolerable that these state actors employ such liberties with the disregard of their proper place and hence displace the millions that placed them in their authority. The level of despondency among their newly enslaved subjects is growing and their learned response is to further isolate them into balkanized partitions, knowing this will provide the opposite of a treatment to this growing problem.
In one month, this plague could be placed into a better position of control while real remedies to these very real tragedies are pursued with a real interest rather than the faux lip service used as treatment currently. Indeed, there are treatments that could be employed and safeguards made available which are readily used to good effect in nations as humble as India – and I mean them no disrespect, but their healthcare is on the margin of other significant nations. Forgive me for the rant, as the obvious nature of these actions are clear to us all. Yet, there are so many people who are being handled very badly by these state actors whose concerns are …sorry I am off again. I seem caught by the disturbing nature of our current realities, and so, I will look to tomorrow for some measure of a pleasant respite. Yes, tomorrow will be a better day, I think.
(3 of 3)
Every clinic or hospital hall can collect case reports and propose hypotheses to be pursued and drug therapies to be tried in additional studies, all while the RCTs are still cooking. With the growing volume of evidence collected in these low data studies and trials a perspective may be drawn. That is not possible with the RCT, as the expense and time are too great to do more than 1. With the RCT, all the eggs are in a single basket, so to speak. And the expense associated with the RCT would suggest that they would be error proof, but, we are all human, so…
On the strength of a single study or review, the RCT would be the obvious choice. That being said, the field of medicine is built on the use of the preponderance of evidence displayed by multiple studies with similar conclusions. The study that Dr. Hoffe was conducting, without seeing anything of what his study included, was I believe a case review study or at least a study along the lines of one of the low data studies. By itself it is only consequential as the basis of additional studies and reviews.
That is not to say that his findings are not significant, as he clearly believes they are. It’s that his study could be flawed for a myriad of reasons. And he seems a capable man and has paid a significant price for his diligence to his patients by losing at least part of his practice. The virus and vaccines have created a tone of concern and alarm and counter concern and counter-alarm. Medicine needs to be approached with a steady diligence which is dispassionate in spite of the death and disassociated in spite of the lives being ruined.
This is no reflection on Dr. Hoffe, as if I were him I would have raised the same alarms he did, given his stated findings. But his findings will be tainted for him doing so and hence, the claims of his bias will be used against his data til something substantiating his claims is found. But if his suspicions are valid, it should be a simple task to duplicate with any group of vaccinated people. It should be noted that he lives in an area that treats many First Peoples, who have, I believe, an increase sensitivity to the SARS-cov2. I have not heard the same was true with the vaccine, but I have no reason to believe it should not be expected as such.
The final point I would raise is the statistical issue. The number of cases is important to evaluate any data. With having a number of 6 patients that cause an alarm, is a very small case study, while 600 is a good number to draw conclusions. The number of 100 is usually considered minimum for good conclusions, but even limited data will have value when shared with the outcomes of other studies. Dr. Hoffe has not released his data, so we know little beyond his claim of 62%, and this limits what there really is to be drawn from such a not unreleased information. I could pursue this further and probably should at some point, but I believe this will give you what info you desired relating to Dr. Hoffe. There are other matters related to this topic that I have purposefully overlooked due to the length, so let me know if something is unclear or if you have any questions.
/3
(2 of 3)
This is why some publications are noted as being rated above others. For example, Lancet’s need to withdraw the published article last year on hydroxychloriquine was a pox on their house, but it was no simple detail that was overlooked by the peers overseeing it. The Lancet was among the top 3 journals in the world, some would say the top journal. These ratings involve the clinicians reviewing the articles. This is why the question is asked how could that article have been reviewed, how could it? Well, I prefer to not answer this question directly, but you might conjecture my response in any event. Sorry for the digression, the point is that publications such as the Lancet should have only very minimal oversights that need noting or amending, rather than the gross incompetence that might not even be expected from the lowest of publications to be placed in print.
Yet, this does not exactly answer your questions. There are many types of studies. the best is the RCT, randomized control trials, but it is not necessarily the most useful, as we will see. Here is a link to a photo of the pyramid of clinical evidence.:
http://image.slidesharecdn.com/associationvscausation-131218151439-phpapp01/95/brief-look-at-association-vs-causation-14-638.jpg?cb=1387379773
The higher the better, and the lower the less valuable. Now, many people have over the past year become engaged in the examination of data and studies for the first time. They have become addicted to seeking out the great idol of Randomized controlled trial. These are often referred to as the gold-standards by which the best results might be achieved. The limitations to such studies include their expense, allotted research time, and cumbersome technicalities involved in keeping the blinded, well, blinded.
These studies are very expensive, and they are usually cost prohibitive resulting in them not being done on very many subjects for this reason first and foremost. The research time is another issue as the studies often will result in delays beyond some imperative point of concern, past which the data is academic as the drug in question will have been used in trial studies or abandoned while another drug is pursued. If the drug is seen to be very helpful, they might just abandon the study and start using the drug, this really does happen as the expense of continuing and the delay may both be eliminated.
The lower information studies involve the collection of simple data on specific cases, or a placebo trial study, animal studies, or cell culture studies. There are subtleties among these, and there are others as well, but they are all looked on as less informative as a single study over the RCT. This is a true statement, but the number of low data studies that might be conducted while the RCT is cooking, is enormous.
/2
(1 of 3)
@Adam
On the outset, I will explain that I have left the medical field and, hence, my opinion should be given no more weight than knowing this may allow. I would always refer people to discuss their health with their personal physician, as I am sure you would, but for the reasons I stated here, I must make this statement clear.
That being stated there is much about the medical field that is poorly understood, and to this point, the peer reviewed article is a topic I have had an interest for months to write about, as their importance can be easily overvalued and misunderstood. The article review process in medicine, as is true in any field, is a monotonous labor attached to a research clinician who will be given the responsibility of reviewing and understanding the basic background, the hypothesis or subject being tested, the very specific means of the testing methods, the results of the investigations and the conclusions drawn(including the limitations and further studies that might add to this present article).
This is a lot to ask a busy clinician when they are neither compensated for the task nor allotted additional time in their busy schedules to conduct such work. Hence, the task is often passed onto subordinates to review and give their interpretations to make the task more manageable. This is not to say that the clinician tasked with the review does not pay it the proper attention, nor to say he does not read it at all. But, it is what it is. The process of peer review, aside from this detail, involves the individual presenting the paper to run the gauntlet of questions on the spur of the moment. There is a point of intimidation by both either those asking questions and those being asked the questions, as physicians with significant reputations are intimidating on either side of the this equation.
The review process is meant to challenge the presenter to see that he has an understanding of his paper and the merits of both its limits and its conclusions. It is an important thing to have been reviewed as opposed to being un-reviewed, but the review process is only as thorough as the members conducting the review are engaged in the preparation, understanding and clear comprehension of the paper they are reviewing. I have always felt the ability to second hand the preliminary steps to this process is a cheat on the process and will likely affect the rigor of the review.
However, being un-reviewed allows the presenter the liberty of not being as thorough in his personal input on the paper and so, if nothing else is to be gained, and I am not suggesting there is nothing else to be gained, this would be at minimum the value to be gained by the review process. At the end of the review process the lable of peer reviewed is stamped on the article, and, in spite of all the rigors that the presenter placed into the study and in spite of all the efforts of the reviewing peerage, flawed papers are not that uncommonly published.
/1
(2 of 2)
This article is either Pharma disinfo designed to undermine his findings or a helpful Hanna that is irresponsibly helping discredit the legitimate concerns of the vaccines as being hysterical naysaying anti-Vacine Nutjobs. Which is why I raised my objections.
When the spike protein breaks loose, it actually breaks into two pieces and the S1 subunit is the part that is significant. It grabs onto ACE2 receptors most have heard about and binds to it and it has been shown that this will result in Pulmonary Hypertension. When free the S1 Subunit is between 75-85kDa(this is a unit of weight) but it is a protein so it is folded up like a piece of crumpled paper. This won’t mean much to many people, but to compare to this the full SARS-cov2 virus is 10,000,000kDa and the virus is very small. This S1 subunit is very, very, very tiny. It can not be detected directly under the microscope. I am unaware of any clinical tool being used to detect the S1 subunit directly alone on blood or tissues. There is a lab test that claims to be able to detect single molecules of proteins and this was the testing that was used in the study that Dr. Bridle raised the alarm saying we have “made a big mistake.” But it is not, I beleive, available for clinical or industrial levels that the over-valued PCR test has been developed towards over the past year.
I will followup on your other questions in the next post as it will likely not be short….
/2
(1 of 2)
@Adam
To be clear, Dr. Hoffe has not detected spike proteins in capillary beds, he has not detected spike protein at all. He ran a blood test. The blood test detects the presence of a byproduct of a blood clot disolving, called D-Dimer. There is a system in the body that maintains a balance between clot formation and clot dissolution, just normally without disease. So there will be a normal level of this D-Dimer byproduct of clot dissolution found in everybody’s blood chemistry, without vaccines, viruses or disease. Dr. Hoffe has found elevated levels of the D-Dimer when testing his patients after several months of having had the vaccines administered. He is performing a classic case of a limited data collection study. He is, in fact, still collecting the data and has nothing to publish at this point. His findings were initially alarming and, hence, he gave his interview and then a followup. He has drawn conclusions from the presence of the elevation in D-Dimer along with patients who are having difficulty breathing. His conclusions are not definitive, they are a hypothesis based on a lab value and clinical signs, but there is not detection of spike in the data he is collecting. His clinical presumption is well based, but inconclusive as to whether pulmonary hypertension is the cause or something related to poor blood-tissue perfusion of oxygen and waste products or something else – recall the diseases associated with spike are quite varied and not entirely settled. His duty was to care for his patients and the public at large by raising the alarm he raised, but his conclusions are not definitive and he does not present them as such, whereas this article twists his words, making me suspect the authors motives.
If his conjecture proves to be accurate for his patients, it is a lethal pathology that is treated with drugs but has what is termed a poor prognosis – i.e. 3yrs til death, or longer in some cases. His point was to raise alarms of what might be happening, not to state that this is what is happening – there is a nuance here that should be noted as significantly different. The elevated D-Dimer is very significant and should be pursued with further testing, but it is only a lab value to indicate a clot is dissolving, nothing specific to spike protein. I want to be clear, I am not stating he is wrong in his clinical judgement, that would be inappropriate, and I suspect he might be correct in any case, but he does not know this is the cause of the exercise intolerance, which is why he does not state it as such.
/1
@ Peloni
I actually looked him up and he is in Lytton a very small town in the interior. Most of his patients are First Nations, about 900 people, and 1 has died wth 4 having serious side effects. I actully emailed my daughter who is like a hawk on the track of a pigeon. She sent me a complte report on it, where it sasy that 8000 die every day, and that the medical authorities have found NO connection between deaths and the administration of the vaccine. It has become national news in the US, and she sent me a US report. He has already lost his hospital privileges, where he was in the Emergency dept. He says it cut his income in half, but he had to apprise the world of his findings..
Peloni this is a question for you–should in general, the intuitive conclusions of a physician who is qualified in his field of specialization, based on his examination of even a limited number of his own patients, be given some weight, even if they have yet to be confirmed by a peer-reviewed scientific study? This is an important question for an “ignorant layman” who has not yet been vaccinated, such as myself, in deciding whether or not to give some weight to Dr. Hoffe’s opinions about the mRNA vaccines. I would sincerely like your professional opinion.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HzFryvUuryVS/. This is the “original” video of Dr, Hoffe’s interview with a British Columbia Journalist. You get a cearer idea of what Dr. Hoffe is saying by watching the original video than you do from the transcript. You also get a clearer idea of whether or not he is qualified in the area of medicine that he practices.
This is from a site called NaturalNews.
Michael–the guy who posted this video worships Adolf Hitler, believes that Hitler lost the war because of a Masonic conspiracy, that the world has ignored Hitler’s warnings about the rise of communism, etc. Not evidence that this is a reliable source.
peloni–a key issue is whether the vaccine leads to an increase in “spike proteins” in blood vessels, especially capillaries. Do you know whether or not any other medical researchers besides Dr. Hoffe have also spotted the presence of these spike proteins in their vaccinated patients?
@Peloni
I left out something important, sorry, I am writing this in between many things. The patients that Dr. Hoffe has seen develop exercise intolerance, an increasing inability to handle what they have been capable of doing in the past, is significant. But it is not necessarily related to the vaccines, or if it is, it could be due to other issues beyond microscopic bloodclots. The blood slides that Michael shared are significant. I will post them here again for the reference:
https://ugetube.com/watch/what-covid-injections-do-to-your-blood-2021-07-16-dr-jane-ruby-stew-peters-video_WHWo5YWPOYBZm2H.html
The role of the Red Blood Cells(RBCs) is to carry oxygen to from the lungs to the tissues and carry waste including Carbon Dioxide from the tissues to the lungs. When the RBCs are injured or agglutinated(stuck together like a role of dimes as seen in the slides) they are unable to complete this task. They will flow through the body, going thru the motions, so to speak, without providing any benefit. The spleen usually checks out the RBCs to determine if they are too damaged to remain in circulation, but if there is as much damage in the circulating RBCs as these slides depict, it is very concerning on a few planes of interest, but beyond our discussion here. The point is that the exercise intolerance that Dr. Hoffe is interpreting with the input of the elevated D-Dimer level to conclude that there are significant blocked capillary fields in the lungs could be due to the inability of the RBCs to carry on business per usual, i.e. the waste is building up and the oxygen is not getting to the tissues. In fact, this lack of detoxification of the tissues, by itself, could cause elevations in D-Dimer levels, though I am speculative if this is the likely the cause. Also, there is the possibility that the exercise intolerance is related to an increase in blood clots and reduced effective RBCs. The point is that more info needs to be pursued.
So, D-Dimer. The statement that “mRNA vaccines ‘will kill most people’ through heart failure”, is well beyond what is known or provably true at this point. It may prove accurate, less than accurate or more than accurate. But this statement is well beyond what is known and is beyond what Dr. Hoffe stated. Dr. Hoffe has collected data that he is still collecting and has only come to alarm people of the increase levels in his patients that he has tested. It is clear that Dr. Hoffe considered the elevation significant and hence he made his statement without any published data. It is important that a serious investigation pursue this and in the meantime STOP THE USE OF THE VACCINES, but of course this is unlikely to occur. What Dr. Hoffe did not say is that everyone is going to die in 3 yrs. LISTEN TO THE VIDEO FOR YOURSELF. Here is the link (start at 16min. 45sec.)
https://www.brighteon.com/b03d1a4e-1cf7-4db5-ab18-2dd5fe6426fa
Here is a transcription of part of his statement, though everything he says is well worth listening to:
Everything that Dr. Hoffe states here is demonstrably accurate. He, however does not say that everyone will be dead in 3yrs.
He has 9 patients who have a difficult time breathing several months after taking the vaccine, and the D-Dimer levels are increased, but this does not mean that they have Pulmonary Hypertension, which is a very specific disease process that can be diagnosed via cardiac echogram or radiograph or CT, though none of these are as cheaply conducted as a D-Dimer test. His findings are significant and worrisome and worthy of pulling the vaccines(yeah, good luck with that) but it is not diagnostic of pulmonary Hypertension, and if it were, it is 9 people who we do not know anything more than they are his patients, ie. age, race, sex history. It is a huge jump between stating that there are increased D-Dimer levels and the pressumption that everyone is developing Pulmonary Hypertension and will be dying in 3 yrs.
A fair statement is essential to interpret anything – the more important or sensitive the matter, the more important this statement becomes. Overstatements and understatements are each a lie worthy of our objections.
I have opposed the use of these vaccines since the first data gave me reason to do so – which was immediately after the limited data was released. Any objection needs to be fact based and fairly stated to prevent muddying the waters. We need to be rational, and accept the harm from the vaccines are real, but this article is just the sort of Straw Man argument that the Pharma will take apart quite easily without further support. Should the additional support be unimpressive, which it might, it will only harm any efforts opposing the use and mandates for these vaccines. But again, Dr. Hoffe’s words are serious enough that I would warn anyone from their use, but his words only provide a concern for further harm. We have tens of thousands of people dead and hundreds of thousands – if not millions – of people who have been injured by these vaccines worldwide. So there is no need to figure how many angels stand on the end of this pin or how many will develop Pulmonary Hypertension to conjecture the future harm. We need to pull the vaccines because people are dying today and deal with what comes as we find it, but we must fairly state that we not yet know what that will look like.
I believe the mortality should have been enough to stop the voluntary use of these vaccines and should certainly have been enough to stop the mandatory use of them, but it has not. Perhaps Dr. Hoffe’s statements will be enough to stop the use of these vaccines, but more than likely it will not be.
If you’ve gotten the jab, this is what your blood looks like:
https://ugetube.com/watch/what-covid-injections-do-to-your-blood-2021-07-16-dr-jane-ruby-stew-peters-video_WHWo5YWPOYBZm2H.html
@Edgar
Here is the citation:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-13-doctor-says-mrna-vaccines-kill-most-people.html
You can copy this citation and sent it to them or have them search for Dr. Charles Hoffe
Here is the video that this article is based on:
https://www.brighteon.com/b03d1a4e-1cf7-4db5-ab18-2dd5fe6426fa
and it should be noted that what he actually says is terribly alarming but this article is an OVERSTATEMENT of what is known. I will write something to hopefully clarify this point better than this article which is possibly accurate, but well beyond what we KNOW to be true at this point. I will try to have this written shortly in the next couple hours.
I want to semnd this article to my children, but see that now, There are no icons reprecenting the usual variety of transfer machines. So How can I do it. ?? It seems important to me. Dr. Hoffe is right here in BC, where I live and I next will “look him up”.
It’s quite a coincidence that th article is written by a reporter named “Huff”…