We may hope that COVID has run its course, and we may mourn our 700,000 dead. On the other hand, strange and terrifying times may have just begun.
There has been a lot of speculation, much of it backed up by evidence, that over the past year, America’s “cause of death” statistics have been skewed. For reasons alleged to be both political and financial, people who did not have a fatal case of COVID were reported as dying from the disease. The classic example is the young man who died in a horrific motorcycle accident, who tested positive for COVID in the postmortem, and was listed as a COVID victim.
Less likely, however, is the possibility that “deaths from all causes” have been misrepresented. Assuming we can rely on the CDC statistics, the data tell a grim story. During the 12 month period between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021, the number of people dying in the United States exceeded the recent historical average for that same April through March period by 701,680. If anything, this number is understated, because CDC data can take up to eight weeks to fill in completely and our dataset is only updated through May 12.
This is an astonishing increase, representing a 25 percent increase over total deaths in previous years, even when adjusting for population growth. The average deaths for the same 12 month period over the last six years, prior to the most recent 12 months, were 2,845,200. That compares to 3,546,880 in the 12-month period through March 31. COVID may have targeted mostly the old and the weak, but target them it did. Based on reporting trends observed over the past year, it may be that so-called “excess deaths” in the United States for April 2021 may finally have fallen back to normal. The graph depicted below shows the shape of these excess deaths.
On the above graph, the horizontal axis starts at the first week of October, which is typically the beginning of flu season. As can be seen on this 18-month continuum, the flu season starts again around two-thirds of the way across, as October repeats. The cluster of tightly packed lines shows total deaths rising starting in October, peaking in January, then falling sharply until the end of March. After that there is a shallow valley, as total deaths reach minimums in August before slowly rising again. The only outlier, apart from the COVID line in dark blue, is the light blue line signifying the particularly bad 2017-18 flu season. But even in that bad year, total deaths did not exceed 70,000 in any given week, and the counts dropped sharply back into the cluster by the end of March. This year of COVID, however, was completely different.
As can be seen on the dark blue line on the graph, total deaths rose almost vertically in April 2020, peaking at 78,937 for the week of April 15. Total deaths then dropped significantly, but never came near the averages for previous years. The first trough was on the week of June 24 when “only” 57,878 people died; this was still 14 percent over normal for that month. And then came the second wave in July, an increase that didn’t rise as high as the one in April, but was spread out over more weeks. But the most remarkable wave was yet to come.
It’s worth wondering why the third wave, by far the deadliest, didn’t get as much media hype. To be fair, anyone who watched television news reports in December and January where they dramatized what it would be like to take your last breath in an ICU, bright lights and a breathing tube descending, would not accuse the networks of inaction. But neither did the hype match the panic of April, or the “second wave” crisis of July. For whatever reason, the third wave, by far the biggest, came and went. At its peak during the week ending January 6, 85,684 Americans died, nearly 60 percent more than average for that time of year.
The COVID Wave Recedes in America, For Now
Anyone trying to make sense out of what’s happened can be certain of only one thing: America’s legacy media, the online communication monopolies, and the medical establishment cannot be trusted. Their betrayal is proven by the censorship and suppression of early stage therapies, the ongoing emphasis on vaccines instead of treatment, and the inability for any dissenting voices to be heard and debated. This betrayal is particularly gruesome because COVID is not a hoax. It is a deadly killer, possibly set to get worse.
When vaccine specialist Geert Vanden Bossche, or virologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, can still be found in podcast backwaters that have escaped the censors, their testimony cannot be refuted. They are denied the light of day, and so their arguments—that the vaccines being deployed will breed more potent variants of COVID at the same time as they compromise human immune systems—gain credibility. Lies, like mold and fungus, grow and fester in the dark, but only truth can survive the light of day. Sunshine is the disinfectant, open debate is the cure. But we’ll never know if these men are prophets or charlatans, because their words are suppressed.
As the more pessimistically inclined among us confront the specter of vaccine passports, mandatory booster shots every year to cope with an endless procession of increasingly virulent strains of COVID, likely medical history implants, travel restrictions, contact tracing, and everything else associated with “the great reset” including supply chain disruptions, rationing, riots, and a supermajority of voters utterly dependent on government, they must wonder: Who runs the world? You don’t have to be a conspiracy theorist to ask that question, though you might be one if you think you know the answer. Still, it’s an intriguing question. Is the world merely a chaotic ecosystem of individual egos, tribal communities, and fitfully coexisting nations? Or is something else happening?
A fascinating video, suppressed repeatedly by the major platforms, but surviving on the obscure website EarthHeroesTV.com, is an interview with Catherine Austin Fitts. About halfway through the 48 minute segment, Fitts asks the question: “Who runs the world?” Wisely, she doesn’t try to answer it. But she does quite a dance around the theme. Fitts, a former high-ranking official with HUD, then a financial entrepreneur, leads off by explaining that the world is moving into a new era of economic totalitarianism. She observes that the wealth of the world is becoming more and more concentrated into nations with advanced technology, and within those nations, disproportionately to a small elite. She claims the COVID pandemic is providing an excuse to institute controls necessary to convert the planet from democratic processes to technocracy.
Fitts says the COVID virus is being used as the means to compel mass vaccine injections that will eventually make it possible to digitally identify and track every person. These biometric markers will then be used to connect people to a new cyber currency, allowing complete control. She believes there are five sectors working in tandem to create this new world order:
- Technology industry building clouds.
- Military doing space development.
- Big pharma developing injections to modify human DNA.
- Media providing propaganda.
- Central bankers engineering a new cryptosystem of global currency.
Fitts is describing a dark version of futurism. Her perspective is negative, but lucid. Technology makes it much easier for a small group of people to get together and become very powerful. But why? Fitts offers a logical answer:
“If technology can make it possible for people to live 150 years, and it isn’t possible to keep this a secret, then why not downsize the population, integrate robots, and you can have a very wealthy and luxurious life without the management headaches?” In one particularly chilling quote, Fitts says “I was having a conversation with a venture capitalist, billionaire type, and he looked at me with these amazingly dead eyes and said ‘I can take every company and completely automate it with software and robotics and fire all the humans. We don’t need them any more.’”
Who runs the world? What if 700,000 dead Americans is just a preamble, and wave after wave of COVID variants rages across the nation in the years to come? Could it really get that bad? What is behind the doomsday cult that informs dialogue in America today? It isn’t just a deadly virus. It’s racism, suddenly amped up to represent an existential threat to civilization. It’s the “climate emergency.” And all of this panic is curated and rained down upon us in an unending deluge of propaganda designed to render us terrified.
Is it too late to promote optimism? Was the truth about the world as expressed by Danish economist Bjorn Lomborg too potent, a bright and hopeful truth, that “air and water are getting cleaner, endangered species and forests are holding their own, and the risks associated with global warming are exaggerated.” He contends that “more people than ever before, living in all parts of the globe, are becoming healthier, richer, and better educated; that the human race is living longer and more peaceably; that we’re considerably freer to pursue our happiness.”
Were things working out? Were peace and prosperity busting out all over? And if so, why did COVID have to kill that momentum? How can that positive momentum be recovered? Why does the “great reset” have to involve perennial disease, mass control, rationing, and repression? Who is right? The optimists or the pessimists? Are we on the verge of the great cull, or the long boom? Don’t ask Joe Biden. Another certainty in these times of great uncertainty is this: Joe Biden doesn’t run anything, much less the world.
The sad truth is we can no longer rely on any of our institutions to provide answers to these questions. The events of 2020 and 2021, from a presidential election that was purchased by technology billionaires to a virus that has been mismanaged from day one, nothing should surprise us anymore. Who knows? Maybe those recently publicized green triangles that operate in restricted airspace, go 13,000 miles per hour, execute 700 G turns, travel in air, water, and probably space, have no visible means of propulsion, and defy gravity, are the emissaries of those who truly run the world.
We may hope that COVID has run its course, and we may mourn our 700,000 dead. On the other hand, strange and terrifying times may have just begun.
@ Michael S:
Yes, Michael, you did find the punchline. It was a devastating and unsparing review of the CDC’s reputation(which they have doubled down upon over the past year) by a well respected member of the medical community. I only wish he had gone on and reviewed the FDA and the NIH as well. He actually could have covered them all at the same time.
@ peloni1986:
Here’s a punch line from the article you cited:
“In 2016 a group of more than a dozen senior scientists at the CDC lodged an ethics complaint alleging that that the CDC was being influenced “by corporate and political interests in ways that shortchange taxpayers.” They noted “the pervasive nature of unethical practices throughout all levels at the CDC.”
“The CDC has a long history of bias and troubling conflicts of interest. This history calls into question the scientific validity of recommendations made by the CDC,” Dr. Huntoon concludes.
“The Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons is published by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), a national organization representing physicians in all specialties since 1943.
“SOURCE Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS)”
— https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cdc-compromised-by-bias-and-conflicts-of-interest-writes-editor-of-the-journal-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-301134882.html
A scripture comes to mind:
Isa.1
[4] Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD, they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward.
[5] Why should ye be stricken any more? ye will revolt more and more: the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint.
[6] From the sole of the foot even unto the head there is no soundness in it; but wounds, and bruises, and putrifying sores: they have not been closed, neither bound up, neither mollified with ointment.
[7] Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers.
This prophecy was given to ancient Judah and Jerusalem; but it applies equally well to the US.
@ Michael S:
Michael, it is a difficult question to answer and that is largely due to the reputation of the CDC. The CDC has been known for years, long prior to Covid, to have been influenced by political considerations as well as influence from the pharmaceutical companies. Here is a fine review of the relative reputation of the CDC such as it is:
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cdc-compromised-by-bias-and-conflicts-of-interest-writes-editor-of-the-journal-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-301134882.html
Dr. Huntoon is a very highly regarded reputation in the medical community as his position would suggest.
Specifically, the data supporting the chart you posted is not available for public review. The raw data is being withheld from public scrutiny. I am uncertain of a reasonable basis to cause the data that was once available to be withheld from the public. Without the raw data which would provide the certainty of the matter we are reliant upon the CDC for the relative ‘truth’ of the chart provided. Additionally, Adam made a good observation that the chart provides more info than is reasonably documented even without the raw data which would necessarily cause an even higher need for scrutiny of the supporting data to produce this document. Ten years ago, or even less, I would be inclined to scoff at such silly suspicions as have replaced the trust in many gov’t institutions in the past couple of years. But specifically, the CDC’s reputation for being compromised by the industry they regulate has been known for a long time. Are they being specifically dubious here? The honest answer is we don’t know. Can we trust them to produce valid evidence without compromising their conclusions? This is a valid question and the answer to it will lead to more serious considerations than the veracity of this chart. With this in mind, I would suggest everyone read the article I provided(it is likely shorter than my comment here) – there is really only one likely conclusion to be made.
I have my own opinions of the CDC and FDA, as I am sure you are familiar. Reagan used to say “trust but verify”. But I believe the CDC has disabused the public’s trust in many ways and most terribly as of late; hence, with regard to their work product, I would verify and leave it to them to earn the public’s trust. But in spite of the CDC’s reputation or any past or current questionable practices by them, I believe it is better to have the data made available than to speculate upon their many possible motives for withholding it. It would be best for all that rather being burdened with having to ‘trust’ them, they should just release the raw data or, at minimum, an honest explanation as to why they chose to withhold it in the first place. Consequently, I have sent an email requesting an inquiry into why the data is no longer available or if access to it can be gained from some other source. There is a contact page for the CDC at:
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/DCS/ContactUs/Form
I would suggest anyone who is of a mind to be able to confirm that chart, drop them a short and courteous letter requesting the raw data be released. It is likely they won’t respond, but paper trails of large quantity of inquiries can result in a positive consequence.
@ peloni1986:
Thank you, Peloni and Adam, for the information. I also encountered a report of children getting myocarditis from the vaccine:
https://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/coronavirus/connecticut-confirms-at-least-18-cases-of-apparent-heart-problems-in-young-people-after-covid-19-vaccination/2494534/
Am I to take it, that the graph shown above
https://overland.amgreatness.com/app/uploads/2021/05/Ring-graphic-for-700000-deaths-CDC-Deaths-from-All-Causes.jpg
is reasonably valid. Is this so? Or has it been created out of thin air?
For what it’s worth, my wife has learned that the swabs used in COVID tests contain ethylene oxide, a known carcinogen. This is described in:
https://www.gasdetection.com/gas-detection-knowledge-base/interesting-applications/covid-19-swabs-ethylene-oxide-and-warehouses/
Ethylene Oxide is a highly reactive compound, that boils at 51°F under 1 atm. It is used to sterilize the swabs before they are shipped; and a tiny amount may be residual in the swabs before they are used. This may (low probabiolity) present a danger to health care workers, but apparently not to the people being tested. I would dismiss this as needlessly alarmist communication.
The OP by Edward Ring is also alarmist in character. I expect it to fall on deaf ears, for the most part, and only increase the divide between the wigged out loonie lett and the “conspiracy theorists”. I’m an optimist, though: I expect the current social order to collapse over the next three years, and then the Perousia.
(2 of 2)
It had been discovered last year that the spike protein had a similar morphology, or shape, to proteins found naturally to occur in the placenta of pregnant women(similar findings were found in the testes of males as well as other organs of both sexes). Based on this fact pregnant women were a concern for the Covid disease due to the possibility of antibodies cross-reacting against these proteins in the placenta. A common concern was raised over the vaccine; however, it has been claimed that the similarities were closely compared and due to this consideration, the concerns were dismissed as unsubstantiated – and pregnant women have, consequently, been included for the target of the vaccine distribution. Again, let me state there were no pregnant women involved in the studies conducted last year beyond those 8 women who were found to accidentally become pregnant and 4 of them miscarried. I don’t know who is behind this wanton disregard to the normal protocols of use of experimental drugs that are being passed about to these known classes of vulnerable individuals whose safety standards are unknowable due to a lack of any relevant studies. I do know that the process of the blood eagle would be a kinder penalty than is due to them.
/2
(1 of 2)
It should be noted that pregnant women are another at risk group who have been told that the vaccine is safe to take. These statements have been made for months and the simple reality is that pregnant women and children were both specifically kept from participating in the human trials last year. This is not unusual during drug/vaccine trials as children are in a developing stage of life and this is obviously even more true of the unborn child. But is also absolutely the norm that these untested groups were then ineligible, regardless even of their desires otherwise, to be authorized to receive these drugs/vaccines. This, however, was not the procedure adopted with regards to the Covid vaccines with, first, pregnant women and, more recently, children. The resulting lack of subjects chosen for these two categories – pregnant women and children – presented a complete absence of data to support even the pretence of any conclusions of safety regarding the use of the vaccines. Let me state that clearly: The studies conducted last year to prove the safety and efficacy of the vaccine did not provide any data delineating any safety standard with regard to pregnant women. There were, however, women of child bearing age included in the study and no less than 8 of these women were found, incidentally, to become pregnant during their participation in the drug trials. This limited sample size is statistically too small to glean any supportive conclusions of a positive safety standard recommending the vaccine for pregnant women. This statement is even less supportive for such a positive safety standard recommendation when it is learned that 4 of these 8 pregnant women were unfortunately found to suffer miscarriages of their pregnancy following their participation in the vaccine trials. And this is all the data that was collected on the safety standards for pregnant women. In spite of this fact, pregnant women were included in the distribution. There is no rational explanation for their inclusion. It was, however, an experimental drug and all consequences for its use has been left to those taking the vaccine. By a pregnant woman taking this vaccine she is voluntarily surrendering her maternal rights as well as any fetal rights of her unborn child. I guarentee that no pregnant woman taking this vaccine was aware of these facts and that is a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code of 1947 which is internationally accepted legal code that is also vested in the US legal code.
/1
@ peloni1986:
I fould a video ov Jane Ruby discussing the Myocarditis in childern. She was previously related to the Trump White House (I forget her position at teh moment). She does a good job covering the subject. Please share her report with anyone who intends to vaccinate a child. This is just unacceptable. None of this was necessary or even heopful!
https://rumble.com/vhnogn-exposed-cdc-and-fda-knew-covid-injections-would-lead-to-heart-complications.html
@ peloni1986:
Also, the onset of the symptoms for this vaccine induced myocarditis is usually within the first several days, but it may present later as well – very similar to the other vaccine induced disease observed.
I have in recent days heard some difficult news regarding the vaccines – yes more. It breaks my heart to have found this to be true. Reports are increasing that the mRNA vaccines by Phizer and Moderna are being reported with significant occurrence of myocarditis among children receiving these vaccines. Initial reports claimed a reported occurrence of 1 case per 50,000 (myocarditis in the general population is approximately this level so there was less concern about this rate of occurrence) but this has now been found inaccurate, probably purposefully misrepresented, to be off by somewhere between 1500%-2000%. Myocarditis is an inflammatory state of the muscular layer of the heart which is called the myocardium. In a normal heart, following an electric stimulation, contraction of this heart muscle occurs in a very specific pattern across the heart to achieve a proper propulsion of blood to the body’s tissues via the left side of the heart and to the lungs via the right side of the heart. Any damage to the heart muscle causes deterioration in the propulsion process and sluggish blood can form clots due to the drop in blood velocity – this is independent of the formation of blood clots directly linked to the vaccine’s effects on the platelets as I have described earlier. Symptoms of the vaccine induced myocarditis can be:
1. from chest pains to difficulty breathing
2. formation of blood clots being ejected to the lungs or body tissue
3. more severe consequences such as heart failure and death.
BASICALLY IT CAN CAUSE EVERY SYMPTOM OF HEART FAILURE(AKA HEART ATTACKS) IN CHILDREN FROM MILD TO SEVERE PRESENTATIONS.
Myocarditis has been found in alarming number of cases in Covid-19 patients since shortly after the mad panic began last year and it is believed to be directly related to the high concentration of ACE-2 receptors in the heart which, of course, is the target of the Covid Spike protein. The challenges for these young children who do not succumb to this side effect of the vaccines will be life long and very likely life limiting. Meanwhile, the stake-holders at the CDC and the medical “experts”(Big Pharma shills) are still advising the children who have nearly 0% risk of disease from Covid to take the shot!! There is no reason to endanger these young lives and they receive no benefit from protections from a disease that does not affect them. They might as well be vaccinated for Canine Parvo Virus!!!
If anyone knows of a parent planning to place their child under this life altering protocol, please intercede and make them aware of the prevalence of this terrible consequence of these vaccines.
@ peloni1986:
As I recall, Birx used to remind people that posting raw data on websites was a useful way to instill confidence that the details and information being shared with the public was accurate. Guess they were aware that someone as astute as yourself might actually dare to check their numbers and, as we can see with the fiasco in the election audits, the Cabal just can’t do simple math.
As I recall, Birx used to remind people that posting raw data on websites was a useful way to instill confidence that the details and information being shared with the public was accurate. Guess they were aware that someone as astute as yourself might actually dare to check their numbers and, as we can see with the fiasco in the election audits, the Cabal just can’t do simple math.
Thanks for all of your data analysis and insights, peloni. They are a big help to us all in evaluating CDC information.
I have just done an updated check of the CDC’s reports on their own site to see if confirms the data in this article from American Greatness. It does not. There is no report on over-all excess mortality updated to March 31, 2021, as the figures given in this article dated. The most recent report on the CDC’s own site is only dated through February 27, 2021. That the CDC would release an updated report to journalists before it had enough confidence in its accuracy to post it on its own site is in my view suspicious.
Another article, from the Wall Street Journal edition of May 21, 2021, gives completely different figures and includes completely different charts. Yet the reporter also says that this information was all given to him by executives of the CDC, whom he identifies by name.
The February 27 CDC report does contain figures and charts similar to those in the American Greatness article, although the estimated excess mortality rate is less than in AG. This report is in a subsection of the CDC site called Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, which the CDC describes as a medical journal that it publishes. The pagination reflects this format.
However, it says that the data is taken from its daily birth and death reports–which it used to publish on its site, but has stopped publishing it very recently. This policy change makes it impossible for readers to check and verify the author’s figures themselves. Hmmmmmm.
The MMWR article gives the mames and academic degrees of the authors, but says nothing about their professional histories, the institutions where they received their degrees, and their places of professional employment, past and present. It does not even indicate whether they are employees of the CDC or outside consultants. All of this information is provided to readers by authentic medical journals.
Despite all of these problematic aspects to the information provided by the CDC to journalists, and those it publishes on its own site, and the discrepancies between them, it is possible that these figures in the AG article are at least roughly accurate. The CDC admits that its MMWR reports are only rough estimates based on preliminary data. But the various discrepancies and omissions make it impossible to know whether they are accurate or not. We may never know.
(2 of 2)
So, whatever might be gained by looking at the guesstimate derived from increased deaths in 2020 which did increase significantly in some regions, the cause of the increase was the loss of normality and presence of Covid infection was only one aspect of this change, and perhaps not the most significant. Everyone who died was misclassified. Whole hospital systems (as was witnessed by nurses volunteering from other states) were committing medical malpractice. How many people died from this terrible practice. Meanwhile, people who were not showing symptoms yet were left to incubate the disease til their systems were overwhelmed. Then they would be hospitalized and treated aggressively with poor outcomes. How many thousands died from this terrible practice. Hospitals stopped conducting non-emergency procedures and people were terrified to have routine heart/cancer scans done. How many thousands died from this terrible practice. Modern medicine is not the apothecary of the middle ages. Regular checkups and aggressive inspections/treatments are life-lengthening practices. Put another way, medical treatments are used to push the equilibrium between life and death so that life is extended at the detriment of death. But in 2020, this too stopped. Our medical community was initially in a state of shock and later it was placed into a state of politically induced paralysis where physicians were threatened with their livelihoods. I heard one physician, a couple of weeks ago, make the comment that physicians are not soldiers and bravery is not a suit they commonly wear. But to treat a patient diagnosed with covid this past year, this is what was needed to pursue honest medical practice in those vital early days of the disease. Now recall the reason that mortality rates are so stable in the industrialized societies is, as stated earlier, due to a functioning healthcare industry not in complete disregard of it. Beyond all of this there was also the issue of increases in depression, drug use, and suicides – all three which were noted as increase and could easily be proposed to play into an elevated death rate. And so the use of the excess mortality is due to something, but I do not believe it can honestly be attributed to Covid disease. A side-note – Oxford recently showed in their research that hospitalization could be avoided in 90% of cases where aggressive early treatment was utilized, not 90% of deaths, but 90% of severe disease was eliminated. Dark ages indeed.
/2
(1 of 2)
The use of the excess mortality rate was postulated as the best possible means to gain an understanding of what the impact the Covid disease had upon total deaths in a given region. The calculation of excess mortality was obtained by averaging the deaths of the previous 5yrs by region to arrive at a rough estimate of the number of deaths that might have been expected in 2020. The excess death rates are largely stable in more industrialized nations due to their significant healthcare industries – remember this as it is an important fact when considering excess deaths. The excess mortality calculation was found to be helpful to arrive at a guesstimate of the crude disparities between the level of deaths that would “normally” be expected to occur in 2020 and the actual deaths experienced in 2020. An obvious failing with this methodology is that it is an estimate based upon normality. Prior to 2020, life was normal and people died from a variety of causes related to normality. If Covid alone was all that changed in 2020, this approach would arrive at a helpful guesstimate of the deaths associated with such an outcome. But in 2020 as we all found out, everything changed. Travel stopped, schooling stopped, work stopped, medical screenings stopped, medical treatments stopped, etc. Fear was tossed at the public from every corner and the catchphrase of the day was 14-days to stop the spread. Only the spread didn’t stop in 14-days or in 140 days. But in that period everything else did. The medical community met the onset of this incoming wave of disease with a heavy conscience and a resulting great loss of life. Indeed, the US medical community was sent back to the dark ages last March. Every attempt towards early treatment was met with cries of heresy and fraud. Successful treatments were undermined by studies including one that incorporated the administration of known lethal doses of the compound hydroxychloroquine. By May, all hope of forming a early treatment protocol was abandoned on the blind hope that if you throw enough money at a vaccine and fast track the process, the experimental vaccine might work. Never in human history has treatment of any disease been ignored while awaiting the development of a potential vaccine. But, regardless of the money dedicated towards the vaccines, why forestall attempts at developing early treatments for this new disease from known protocols used against diseases that were similar in presentation. This is how medicine has always been practiced. But not in 2020.
/1
The CDC offers political medicine disguised as public health. I don’t believe a single statistic coming out of the lethally corrupt CDC, especially their mortality statistics. Even the corrupt United Nations World Population Prospects shows the actual death rate in the United States was stable from 2019 through 2020, and shows a reduction in 2021.
The Politization of the “medical industry” by the dems has led to countless and unnecessary deaths!
The medical leaders have failed abysmally the American people.
No one cares!
This highly unethical conduct is in absolute contradiction with “Do no harm”!
@ adamdalgliesh:
Good find here, Adam. I would like to believe that nothing would surprise me related to the failings of the Vaccine-stakeholders running the CDC and FDA who have been responsible for much of the disinformation produced and crisis mismanagement experienced over the past year. But unfortunately it does. I believe it is to be best practice to ignore anything emanating from those failed institutions as self-serving propaganda that is best ignored by all – no grain of salt is large enough to mask their intentional incompetence.
That’s a really “big if!”
I have been looking at the CDC reports recently, and discovered there was no such report of “700,000” (other sources, such as the Wall Street Journal, give the total as 580,000) prepared by the CDC’s own staff. It is true that CDC executives gave given out these numbers to journalists. But their own staff has filed no such report.
The CDC did republish a report by medical researchers not working for the CDC, which was originally published published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. However, when I checked out the footnotes of the report as it was published by the CDC, I was surprised to find that not one of these sources confirmed the numbers given by the three authors. It is thus not at all clear where these claimed numbers of “excess deaths” originated, or who compiled them, and from what sources. What is clear, however is that the CDC’s own staff did not report these figures. A very, very, fishy situation. CDC’s executives have lied outrageously when they told the MSM that these figures were compiled by the CDC.