How will we know who won the war?

T. Belman.  Glick argues that Iran/Hamas didn’t trust the Raam leader as he seemed to embrace the Abrahamic Accords rather than his Muslim Brotherhood goals.  They wanted to scuttle both the impending coalition with the support of Ra’am and the Abrahamic Accords.

So for her, the litmus test is two fold. 1) will the SC side with the Jewish landlords in Sheikh Jerrah and 2) will the AA continue to strengthen and bear more fruit.

One day we might learn that Iran prompted Hamas to launch the most recent offensive against Israel in an attempt to block Ra’am leader MK Mansour Abbas from making good on his offer to provide parliamentary support for the next government of Israel.

By  Caroline B. Glick, ISRAEL HAYOM

How will we know who won the war?

Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike on a Hamas target in Gaza on May 17, 2021 | Photo: Fatima Shabir/Getty Images

Maybe one day, we will discover that the impetus for Hamas’s newest onslaught against Israel wasn’t the pending Supreme Court decision about whether or not to respect the property rights of Jewish landlords in the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood in Jerusalem. Maybe we’ll discover that Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’ efforts to deflect Palestinian public opinion away from his decision to cancel the elections to the Palestinian Legislative Council and chairmanship had little to do with Hamas’s missile offensive against Israel or the Arab Israeli pogroms against their Jewish neighbors in cities and on roads throughout the country.

It’s possible that in the fullness of time, we will learn that, acting with Iranian guidance and permission, Hamas chose to open its new campaign against Israel now because its leaders and their Iranian bosses were desperate to block MK Mansour Abbas from making good on his offer to provide parliamentary support for the next government of Israel – whatever form it takes.

Mansour Abbas, the leader of the four-man Ra’am Islamist Knesset faction is a riddle. Is he playing Israeli Jews for fools, speaking of Jewish-Muslim cooperation from one side of his mouth while staying true to the Muslim Brotherhood’s jihadist creed from the other side? Or is he the real deal; the domestic Arab Israeli expression of the Abraham Accords, predicated on a willingness to make lasting peace between Arabs and Jews?

The truth, at this point, is unknowable.

In the face of the violent Arab Israeli onslaught against Jews countrywide, now is no time for Israelis to base a governing coalition on a riddle like Abbas. But while for Israelis he is a source of confusion, for Hamas, Abbas is a nightmare. Whatever Abbas’s actual intentions are, it is self-evident that Hamas and its partners and supporters think he is acting in good faith and consequently, they view him as the gravest threat their longstanding political war against Israel has ever faced.

In a speech in Doha, Qatar on May 15, translated by MEMRI, Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh discussed the meaning of Hamas’s new war. Although he didn’t mention Mansour Abbas, the text of his speech demonstrated that Abbas was living rent-free in Haniyeh’s head. Haniyeh declared that obliterating the very notion of true peace between Arabs and Jews in Israel was Hamas’s chief goal in this war.

In his words, “Jerusalem unites us. Today the geographical barriers within historic Palestine have been removed. Today Palestine is waging an Intifada from Rosh Hanikra to Eilat.

“They have thought that 70 years or more could kill the spirit of belonging of our people within the occupied land in 1948 [sovereign Israel, CBG]. They thought our people there would lose their identity and would assimilate in the Zionist entity…

“But today our people within the 1948 borders are the ones defending the Al-Aqsa mosque. They are the ones waging an intifada against the occupier and the settlers. Today brothers and sisters, some theories collapse and some are being rebuilt. The theory of coexistence between two peoples within the 1948 borders, a theory they have been cultivating for 70 years, is being trampled underfoot today by our sons and our people in Lod, Ramle, Baka al-Gharbiyeh, the Galilee, the Negev, Rahat, Beersheba and Safed. Safed is ours!”

The axis that supports Hamas begins in Iran continues through Qatar and Turkey, Syria and Lebanon. It then moves to the west – to the European Union and to progressive activists and lawmakers in the Democrat Party in the US.

Azmi Bishara, a former Knesset member who fled to Qatar just before he was arrested for treason for spying for Hezbollah in the 2006 war in Lebanon, serves today as senior advisor to the Emir of Qatar. In an interview with Al Araby network last week, Bishara discussed the expanding ties between the American left and the Hamas-Iran axis. The interview was translated by MEMRI.

Bishara argued that US President Joe Biden’s ostensible support for Israel is a relic of his 40 years in Congress. Bishara claimed that during Biden’s long tenure on Capitol Hill, Congress was controlled by “the Zionist lobby,” so Biden had no choice but to hold the line.

Bishara mocked what he presented as Biden’s slavish devotion to the “Zionist lobby,” scoffing, “Biden’s the one who said you don’t have to be Jewish to be a Zionist. It was Biden who made this strange statement!”

Today, Bishara maintained, the situation in Washington has changed.

“In the long run,” he maintained, “we should rely on the grassroots of the Democrat Party. There are more Arabs and Muslims among these activists now. There are more African-Americans and leftists there…. These people constitute the pressure group within the Democrat Party and elsewhere. We should put our trust in them for the long run.”

The same Arab, Muslim, Black and leftist activists Bishara was referring to that are now sitting in Congress came through for him and his fellow members of the Hamas-Iran axis this week. Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ilhan Omar were joined by a dozen or so other lawmakers as they collectively came out of the closet as anti-Semites.

The Democrat lawmakers adopted classic anti-Semitic language when they condemned Israel as an “apartheid state,” rejecting its very right to exist. They also mounted a pressure campaign on Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, demanding that he place a hold on an approved sale of $735 million worth of precision guided missiles to Israel.

It took an even more powerful pressure campaign on Meeks from Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) to cancel the effort. And while Hoyer was able to avoid a direct assault on US military sales to Israel, the very fact that the progressive anti-Semites in the Democrat caucus put the issue on the agenda – where it still remains – is a testament to the fact that today, they are dictating the terms of debate on Israel in the Democrat Party, and their terms begin with the assumption that Israel is evil. So great is the Democrats’ fear of their anti-Semitic members that this week every single Democrat voted against supplemental aid to Israel and every single Democrat voted against sanctioning Hamas.

Hamas/Iran felt that Mansour Abbas was a threat worth going to war to destroy because they perceive him as the Israeli expression of the Abraham Accords. And in the minds of the Iranian leadership and those of their Hamas proxies, the Abraham Accords represent the single greatest military and political threat to Iran’s nuclear and hegemonic ambitions. Destroying them is their strategic goal.

The Abraham Accords provide a formal framework for the operational partnership that developed since 2006 between Israel and the Sunni Arab states that, like Israel, are threatened by Iran. In formalizing those ties, the Abraham Accords split the Arab/Islamic world into two camps. The first camp includes Iran and the states and terror groups Iran supports, controls and is allied with. Political forces hostile to Israel in the West support this camp. Members of the Iran camp and its supporters in the West insist the Jewish state is the greatest source of instability and the primary obstacle to peace in the Middle East.

The second camp is comprised of Israel and the Arab states that understand that Iran is the greatest threat to peace and security in the Middle East. Arab members of this camp include Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, Sudan and Morocco. These Arab states believe that in alliance with Israel they will be able to contain and eventually defeat the Iranian regime.

Until the Abraham Accords were formalized, only the Iranian camp had an international presence. The anti-Israel, pro-Iran narrative, which claims that Israel is the greatest threat to regional and world peace, had the stage to itself from Tehran to California. Since the Abraham Accords were signed last September, the Iranian camp has been on the defensive.

In a press briefing on Tuesday, President Joe Biden’s spokeswoman Jen Psaki indicated that the administration is just as unhappy with the Abraham Accords as the Iranians and Palestinians are. In response to a reporter’s question about the Trump administration’s peace efforts, Psaki pretended that the Abraham Accords don’t exist.

“Aside from putting forward a peace proposal that was dead on arrival,” she said derisively, “we don’t think they did anything constructive, really, to bring an end to the longstanding conflict in the Middle East.”

This asinine statement put paid the notion that Biden will ever opt for an alliance with the Abraham Accords member nations over the Iran/Hamas axis.  Just as the administration refuses to even utter the term “Abraham Accords,” so it insists on ignoring their political significance for the states of the region and their military capacity to contain Iran.

Despite the massive pressure that has been exerted against Abraham Accords member states to disavow their ties with Israel since Hamas opened its offensive last week, so far they have not wavered. The UAE, Bahrain and Morocco have put out mild statements on the Hamas war. Morocco sent humanitarian aid to Gaza. There have been no anti-Israel demonstrations in the streets of any of the Abraham Accords member states.

Sudan’s leader, Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan discussed the issue in an interview with France 24 in Arabic earlier this week. The interview was translated by MEMRI.

In his words, “The normalization [of relations between Sudan and Israel] has nothing to do with the Palestinians’ right to establish their own state. The normalization is reconciliation with the international community, and with Israel as part of the international community.”

Making clear that Sudan would not be bullied into ending its relations with Israel, Al-Burhan added that the decision to maintain relations with Israel is a sovereign Sudanese decision. It is “the prerogative of the state institutions,” said.

Since it is clear that Israel made clear from the outset that it had no interest in conquering Gaza, Hamas will declare victory no matter how much damage it sustained from Israeli airstrikes. So too, after the Biden administration placed the threat of condemning Israel at the UN Security Council on the table in the first days of the conflict, it was clear that Israel wouldn’t dare defy Biden for long once he publicly demanded a ceasefire. So Israel stood down without ever stating outright what it would view as a victory in this confrontation.

Despite the deliberate lack of clarity, Israel may well emerge the victor. Two parameters will determine who has won this round of war. First, if the Supreme Court sides with the law and respects the property rights of the Jewish land owners in Sheikh Jarrah, their ruling will deliver a stinging defeat to the Iranian/Hamas axis and their American and European supporters who insist that Jews have no property rights in the neighborhood because they are Jews.

Second, if the Abraham Accords survive the war and ties between Israel and its Arab partners expand and deepen, then Hamas and its partners will be the losing side. As for Mansour Abbas, time will tell if he is a friend or an enemy. But in the meantime, his political survival is a national interest.

<
>
<
>

May 21, 2021 | 11 Comments »

Leave a Reply

11 Comments / 11 Comments

  1. Gaza official says 2,000 housing units destroyed in war with Israel
    United Nations says 800,000 people don’t have regular access to clean water, as nearly 50% of network was damaged in fighting.

    2021, following a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian terror groups (Emmanuel DUNAND / AFP)

    GAZA CITY — A Palestinian official says an initial assessment shows at least 2,000 housing units were destroyed in the fighting between Israel and Palestinian terror groups in Gaza.

    Naji Sarhan, deputy of Gaza’s Hamas-run works and housing ministry, said more than 15,000 other units were partly destroyed in the 11-day war.

    At least 200 dead terrorists. Hamas is now plucking them out of the rubble of the tunnels. They have found 23 so far.

    Full article at https://www.timesofisrael.com/__trashed-35/

  2. The one and only analysis (C.Glick ) that dig the roots of this short Hamas attack . 1) Iran-Turkey wanted to avoid a new Bibi government, and feared Mansour Abbas support to Bibi. 2) the many leftists and anti-israel nominated by the Biden administration were interpreted by Iran-Hamas as if the USA were shifting alliance against Israel . Also the feeling is that Biden’s team is ready to destroy what achieved Trump-Kushner ( Abraham agreements ) . 3) The pretext used by Hamas was a ludicrous dispossession of the Al Aqsa espalanade 4) the deep fears of Iran are that the Emiratis , are now in good terms with Israel ( as a result of the Abraham agreements ) .This new reality ( the Emirati sovereign fund has bought a 20% stake in Israel gas field ) has changed the balance of the Middle East. 5) Hamas achieved really nothing and accepted Egypt cease-fire .

  3. @ adamdalgliesh:
    I thought the district court confirmed that the squatters should be evicted. The Supreme delayed their case before the war started was my understanding. Do you have link to an article to document your statement. I have also heard nothing about it on Israeli TV.

  4. The Israel Supreme Court has already sided with the squatters by rescinding its earlier permission to the propery owners to evict these Arab squatters.

  5. @ Bear Klein:
    I agree entirely with your assessment Bear, but I would add a correlation to your point #2 which I found to be even more disturbing than the riots. Of all the strategic issues that came from, or may come from, this most recent conflict, as I see it, the most disturbing is that Israel seemed to be caught unaware of the Arab Israeli riots. I do not believe that these acts of violence coordinated with Hamas on chance. Perhaps, the intelligence services knew of the riots and, due to intelligence requirements. chose to act as if they were unaware. If this is not the case, this was a huge failing and much more concerning than even the riots themselves.

  6. Being Conflated are different subjects:

    1. Who won the war militarily. Hands Down Israel, the IDF and SHin Bet. Destroyed Tunnels, destroyed Hamas military industries, shot down all their drones, destroyed 10 drone submarines that were going to attach strategic Israeli facilities such as the Gas Depots, killed a few 100 terrorists and 25 or 35 commanders. Destroyed much above their above ground infrastructure in the high rises. Perhaps over 1000 buildings damaged or destroyed

    Hamas killed one IDF medic and wounded an IDF bus driver. They hit zero military targets. They did kill 11 civilians and wound many more and wrecked some apartments. They did scare the Israeli civilian population in many parts of the country.

    2. Exposed as a bigger problem is the rift between Israeli Jews and those Muslim Arabs inside Israel who identify as Palestinians and are Israeli citizens or Arab residents of Jerusalem. This is a serious problem with no easy or likely solution.

    3. What will happen in Gaza next will Israel allow as in the past cash and building materials into Gaza which will help facilitate the next round of rockets and missiles being shot into and out of Gaza? Will Hamas firepower keep improving so that the IDF will have to go in on the ground and stay?

    Will Israel be able to get the USA, EU and friendly Arab countries to back it say nothing but food and medicine into Gaza until Hamas steps down in Gaza and turns over its weapons to the Egyptians?

    Will Israel be able to mount effective Habara to get the USA and EU to see that Hamas and Iran are the problem and not Israel.

  7. A typical example of MSM reporting of the 11-day war.

    Israel-Gaza cease-fire doesn’t mean the IDF should be excused for striking health facilities
    Ahmed Twaij is a freelance journalist, filmmaker and doctor.
    May 20, 2021, 7:01 PM EDT
    Image: PALESTINIAN-ISRAEL-GAZA-CONFLICT-HEALTH-VIRUS
    By Ahmed Twaij, journalist, filmmaker and doctor

    In any war, the need for a safe humanitarian space is paramount. Not only are innocent civilians injured in the crossfire of violence they are not party to, but preventing them from receiving effective care for their wounds compounds their suffering.

    Even if Hamas militants were “in the unit for medical reasons” or “small arms and ammunition” are found on the premises, the targeting of the clinic would still be considered a war crime.
    Having worked as a doctor on the front lines during the war on the Islamic State militant group in Iraq, I have witnessed firsthand the necessity of having a safe space to tend to patients fleeing war. The sound of U.S. airstrikes, resonating across the camp as regularly as a beating drum, would shake the ground of our clinic on the outskirts of Mosul. Clouds of smoke from the explosions would cover the skies like an ominous storm, serving as an overshadowing reminder that we were in a war zone as well as a health care facility.

    It was harrowing, but being in regular contact with U.S. and Iraqi military forces, medical camps were able to set up and be protected, operating with minimal risk of being attacked. Giving GPS coordinates to the military forces on a daily basis prevented any accidental attacks on the camps.

    So we operated on faith that the U.S. fighter pilots respected the coordinates we had provided. We had no shelter or defense. I still remember hearing the initial bombs drop, and fear and anxiety rapidly permeating my emotions. But as soon as the first casualties arrived, adrenaline took over and I learned to ignore the emotions to help those in need. Thankfully, we were never hit by U.S. bombs.

    Internally displace persons setting up shelter just outside a medical clinic in a camp on the outskirts of Tal Afar, Iraq, a city occupied by ISIS.Courtesy Ahmed Twaij
    Knowing there can be an effective system for protecting medical facilities during wartime, it was particularly troubling to see earlier this week that a clinic run by Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), providing trauma and burn treatment to victims of the recent fighting in the Gaza Strip, announced it had been struck by an Israeli aerial bombardment.

    The targeting of health care facilities such as this one is a potential war crime. Beyond the humanitarian tragedy the situation poses for Palestinians on the ground, understanding why this constitutes a war crime is vital for assessing the true scope of the damage Israel has inflicted. Protected from United Nations Security Council criticism by the Biden administration, Israel has conducted airstrikes across Gaza with impunity. Even if the fighting soon stops under an expected cease-fire, not holding Israel to account for potential war crimes greenlights future heinous attacks.

    Like my clinic in Iraq, MSF regularly updates the Israel Defense Forces with the GPS coordinates of its clinics, as well as clearly marking its buildings with medical symbols. I don’t believe it’s possible that Israeli forces didn’t know the location of the clinic. Particularly as Israel routinely uses precision-guided missiles, the attack on the health care facility must be questioned.

    International law specifically addresses this type of circumstance, making very clear what’s allowed — and what’s so problematic about Israel’s behavior. According to the Geneva Conventions, the only circumstance in which health centers may lose their protection and become a legal target (though one limited to a proportionate response) is when they are used “to commit, outside their humanitarian duties, acts harmful to the enemy.”

    Israel has yet to answer for the attack on the MSF clinic, which comes as part of a barrage of strikes the country has launched in response to rocket fire aimed at Israeli cities by the Palestinian militant group Hamas. In a previous round of fighting in which Israel attacked a hospital in Gaza, however, Israeli officials claimed the hospital had been turned into a “missile-launching site.”

    Indeed, if Hamas was using the clinic as a kind of human shield, it would then be guilty of conducting a war crime and must be held accountable. But since virtually no one, including journalists and human rights observers, has been allowed access to Gaza from Israel or Egypt since the fighting began and borders were sealed, the onus is on Israel to provide sufficient evidence that the clinic was a legitimate target.

    Importantly, even if Hamas was using the medical clinic to conduct military operations, Israel must still meet certain conditions prior to any attack. Under international law, protection of medical centers ends “only after a due warning has been given, naming, in all appropriate cases, a reasonable time limit and after such warning has remained unheeded.” MSF has stated it didn’t receive any prior warning about last week’s strikes, raising more questions about the legality of the attack.

    Medical neutrality, the concept of providing equal access to health care even in times of war as outlined in international law, goes further to suggest that even if Hamas militants were “in the unit for medical reasons” or “small arms and ammunition” are found on the premises, the targeting of the clinic would still be considered a war crime.

    The situation is particularly perilous given that the Palestinians who rely on the clinic often have nowhere else to go. During times of war, humanitarian corridors are often created to allow safe pathways for civilians seeking security. Throughout my time in Iraq, for instance, those fleeing Mosul, Tikrit, Fallujah or other regions were able to enter camps where multiple international human rights observers and journalists could ensure that the rights of each internally displaced person were upheld. But in Gaza, civilians are trapped by Egypt’s and Israel’s restrictions on freedom of movement. The only health care facilities the civilians have access to are often the very ones targeted.

    Sadly, health care facilities have increasingly found themselves under fire in recent years. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad has often deliberately targeted health centers in Syria, Saudi Arabia bombed MSF hospitals in Yemen and the United States destroyed an MSF hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, in 2015.

    At the time of the U.S. attack, MSF demanded that the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Mission conduct an independent review of the incident, but instead an internal U.S. military investigation was conducted. The Pentagon report declared the attack wasn’t a war crime, but reparations were provided to the victims and 16 military personnel were disciplined.

    Israel shouldn’t be allowed to escape with similar impunity. Not only should its leaders be held accountable, but they should pay for the damage caused. Beyond the MSF facility, in the past two weeks of fighting, Israeli airstrikes have reportedly killed senior doctors, among an already thinly stretched workforce, and damaged Gaza’s Ministry of Health.

    The bombing of roads leading to Gaza’s main hospital, Al-Shifa Hospital, has further cut access to health care for the victims of violence. Already suffering from as much as $16.7 billion worth of economic devastation as a consequence of the Israeli and Egyptian blockade, the siege on Gaza has severely limited access to life-saving medications for Gaza’s health care providers.

    This all comes amid a global pandemic in which Gaza is suffering from a second wave of Covid-19 cases. Gaza’s only Covid-19 testing lab was also damaged by airstrikes earlier this week.

    Israel cannot continually destroy Gaza’s health care infrastructure and remain unaccountable. It’s time global pressure was applied and independent investigations conducted, with those responsible tried at the International Criminal Court. Israel seems to be conducting war crimes in plain sight and, in the name of self-defense, getting away with it.

    Subscribe to the THINK newsletter

    ReTHINK the news cycle with timely op-eds, in-depth analyses and personal essays delivered weekly to your inbox.

  8. Some bastard is maliciously blocking my access to the comments section. Evidence points to the hacker being a hacker being a reader of Israpundit, since my access to comments on other web sites is unaffected. I have a pretty good idea who the hacker is, but I won’t make any accusations towards anyone without hard evidence. Ted, you have a duty to get to the bottom of this and stop the malicious hacking of your site.

  9. Israel has lost the propaganda war in the United States, due to the MSM’s siding with Hamas against Israel. See this poll conducted by a reliable conservative polling organization, the Trafalgar Group, Reported in the May 19 Washington Examiner:

    Democrats side with Hamas, a terrorist origination, over Israel in latest conflict: Poll
    | May 19, 2021 11:23 AM

    A new poll revealed that more Democrats blame Israel than Hamas, a terrorist organization, for the recent outbreak of violence in Gaza.

    “Big partisan divide on fighting in #Gaza according to new @trafalgar_group @COSProject national #poll,” wrote Trafalgar Group chief pollster Robert C. Cahaly on Twitter. “@GOP & Independents blame #Hamas, @Palestine_UN, & #Iran; @TheDemocrats blame @Israel.”

    While 27.4% of all voters surveyed believe Israel is responsible for the recent violence in Gaza, that number jumps to 38.5% of Democrats surveyed. Meanwhile, only 15.5% of Democrats blame Hamas. Another 5.7% of Democrats blame the Palestinian Authority for the violent outbreak.

    Both the United States and the European Union classify Hamas as a terrorist organization. Meanwhile, the U.S. State Department classifies Israel as a U.S. ally, saying the country “is a great partner to the United States, and Israel has no greater friend than the United States.”

    BIDEN HUDDLES ON TARMAC WITH ‘FIGHTER’ TLAIB AFTER SHE SLAMMED WHITE HOUSE MIDDLE EAST POLICY

    The numbers reveal a large partisan divide in assigning blame, with more Republican respondents, at 42.5%, placing the blame on Hamas, compared to 12.5% who blame Israel. Independents sided narrowly with Republicans on the issue, with a total of 35.6% blaming either Hamas or the Palestinian Authority for the violence, compared to 31.2% who blame Israel.

    A total of 9.8% of voters placed the blame on Iran, while another 26.6% were unsure who they assigned blame to.

    The conflict in Gaza has also revealed a divide between Democratic lawmakers in Washington, with tensions flaring between the younger, activist wing of the party, who view the violence as a racial justice issue similar to those in the U.S.

    “Do Palestinians have a right to survive?” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in response to President Joe Biden saying that Israel had a right to defend itself. “Do we believe that? And if so, we have a responsibility to that as well.”

    CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

    James Zogby, the founder of the Arab American Institute, believes the divide between the base and traditional wing of the party may grow even wider.

    “The base of the party is moving in a very different direction than where the party establishment is,” Zogby said. “If you support Black Lives Matter, it was not a difficult leap to saying Palestinian lives matter, too.”

  10. “The Arab definition of victory is apparently that they’re not all dead after attacking Israel. All night long, Arabs in Jerusalem, Gaza and other areas celebrated the “victory” they achieved over Israel once the ceasefire was declared. Admittedly, there is a certain lack of satisfaction on the Israeli side that all of Hamas wasn’t completely obliterated and the bodies of our two kidnapped soldiers have not been returned.

    Yet in the meantime, as Israelis calmly prepares for Shabbat, Hamas has begun digging out the bodies of their terrorists from the 100 kilometers of destroyed terror tunnels. As of Friday morning, they managed to excavate 23 bodies, and that’s just the beginning.

    The IDF estimates that 5 very senior level Hamas terrorists were eliminated, 20 mid to senior level terrorists were killed, and 200 regular terrorists were removed for good, and that Hamas’s terror infrastructure and capabilities were set back years.

    https://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/hamas-digging-out-dozens-of-terrorist-bodies/2021/05/21/

    I think it’s safe to say that Israel won. Israel always wins. World-wide hatred? Same thing happened in 2014 and in 2000. I remember arguing with liberal Jews who said Sharon caused the Oslo War because he visited the Temple Mount accompanied by security.

    This is why Israel was founded!!!!

    “In every generation, they rise up to destroy us.”

    And concessions get made to avert Arab anger all the time by the liberal Supreme Court.

    Only thing different is the Abraham Accords.

  11. The war will be won when the other side sees that there is no hope (permanently) of ever defeating Israel and is totally demoralised