On Wednesday, Canada backed a final vote on a resolution condemning Israel as an ‘occupying power’ despite recent reassurances to the Jewish community
Canada faced an angry backlash in November when it first voted in support of a controversial UN resolution co-sponsored by North Korea, Zimbabwe and others. It condemned Israel as the “occupying power in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including East Jerusalem” and said Israel’s actions impede the right of the “Palestinian people to self-determination.”
Last week, Trudeau responded to concerns from the Jewish community, the former U.S. ambassador to the UN, as well as from within his own caucus, when he said, “Canada remains a steadfast supporter of Israel and Canada will always defend Israel’s right to live in security.”
Speaking at a menorah lighting on Parliament Hill, he said, “I understand that many of you were alarmed by this decision. The government felt that it was important to reiterate its commitment to a two-states-for-two-peoples solution at a time when its prospects appear increasingly under threat.”
UN Watch, an organization that monitors the United Nations, launched a petition after last month’s vote urging Canada to change its mind. It collected nearly 40,000 signatures as Wednesday’s final vote was cast and referred to Canada’s decision as a “Faustian bargain.”
Hillel Neuer, director of UN Watch, said the resolution condemned Israel’s security barrier but it “omits to mention that it was built in response to the Second Intifada which killed or wounded 8,341 Israelis by Palestinian suicide bombings, suicides, stoning, stabbings, lynchings, rocket and other methods of attack.”
The campaign for the Security Council seat has been important to the Liberal government and the recently released mandate letter for Foreign Affairs Minister François-Philippe Champagne directed him to “lead Canada’s United Nations Security Council campaign” as one of the top priorities.
The campaign faces long odds, though, with both Norway and Ireland campaigning hard for the seat. Both countries have been lobbying for the seat for more than a decade, with Canada only announcing its intentions in 2016. Ireland will likely be the EU favourite, while the Norwegians will get points for out-sized foreign aid contributions each year.
In early December, former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley said Canada voting for the resolution was an example of “cultural corruption playing out in real time” and was “trading its integrity” for a seat on the Security Council.
“This is a resolution that Canadian governments for years have voted against,” said Haley. “I speak from experience when I say the United Nations presents many opportunities to strike a deal with the devil.” |
@ zee:
And all for just a very temporary seat that Trudeau’s tucchas won’t even be warming……although he should get vicarious heatwaves from his representative, whoever that will be…has to be another such as Trudeau.
@ stevenl:
While the liberal Canadian Jews are just as bad as the American ones, they’re a much smaller percentage of Canadian Jewry.
Trudeau has a minority government which is dependent on the anti-Israel NDP or the slightly less anti-Israel Bloc Quebecois and the rabidly ant-Israel Greens.
After he was elected to office in 2015, the dear leader (Justin) said that Canada was the first post-modern nation; that we had no core values. You see the result in the UN vote. The Liberal party will do anything to claim the seat at the Security Council. Be prepared for even more outrageous behaviour.
@ stevenl:
No they’re not, your friend is correct. In some cases even worse, from 1/2 wits to 1/4 wits.
Trudeau must be taking his cue from US liberal Jews although Canadian Jews are not ideologically far from US liberal Jews according to a Canadian friend of mine