Why does the IDF support BDS and Peace Now campaigns against Israel

By Moshe Dann, JPOST

One of the most powerful arguments used against Israel is that it is “stealing private Palestinian land.” Of course, this is not only illegal, it is immoral and contrary to Jewish law. The source for this accusation, moreover, is the Civil Administration (CA), a branch of COGAT (Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories), the IDF authority that operates the civil and judicial system in Judea and Samaria (the “West Bank”).

It was recently reported that Israel intended to approve thousands of homes for “settlers” in Judea and Samaria, and “retroactively authorize illegally built settler homes on private Palestinian property.”

The CA also decided that some parts of Givat Eitam, a new area of Efrat in Gush Etzion, belonged to “private Palestinians.” There were, however, no adverse claims. Last summer, nine fully built homes in Elazar in Gush Etzion were destroyed by the CA because tiny areas of the homes were thought to have been built on “private Palestinian land.” For the same reason, the IDF destroyed Amona, and nine homes in Ofra last year. It caused great suffering, with great losses, and no one benefited.

The CA did not offer proof or documentation for their claims. And the High Court approved.

A newly passed Settlement Regulation Law provides a legal mechanism for authorizing homes to be built in this area, while compensating Palestinian landowners who have a valid claim.

Although Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit opposes the law, he said that in some instances it might be possible to allow seizing private Palestinian land. According to the new law, special courts would be established to adjudicate land disputes. The CA, however, has exclusive control of the documents related to land own ership and has the sole right to determine what “private Palestinian land” is or not. The CA is both judge and jury, and there is no appeal.

The only way to know if land is owned by someone is through the Land Registry. In Israel that is straightforward. But in Judea and Samaria, it means going to the Jordanian Land Registry (taba) – which is not open to Jews/Israelis, with one exception. The only organization which has permission is the CA – which does not allow access to Jews.

Requests to the CA for information about the documentation and evidence that Jews are stealing and building on “private Palestinian land” were rebuffed.

 

According to the CA: “The land registries in the Judea and Samaria Region are covered under the confidentiality of the registry under the Order Concerning Land (Examination of Registries) (Judea and Samaria) (No. 1737), 5764-2014.”

Therefore, the transfer of information relating to these registries “may only be granted to the holder of a right as defined in the order, and to whomever holds the right under the conditions specified therein.”

This means that until or unless COGAT and the CA allow access to the documents, there is no way to evaluate if their determination that the land in question is owned “privately” is true. There is also no way of knowing if their decisions are valid. They are secret and cannot be examined or questioned. Who are they protecting and why?

This practice by COGAT and the CA has led to the destruction of thousands of Jewish homes backed by court orders without ever having to prove their contention. It has led to Jewish suffering and hardship. It has not benefited any Arabs, since the areas are usually inside or near Jewish communities. This practice has shattered Israel’s moral image and its international standing. What purpose does it serve?

For those who don’t get it, this is how COGAT and the CA contribute to the Palestinian narrative: “The Israeli occupation of Palestine (and Palestinians) means, you steal our land, our livelihood, and then you steal our identity and our souls.”

Lack of transparency by COGAT and the Civil Administration regarding the status of land in Judea and Samaria has led to confusion, tragedy and bitterness. It wastes taxpayer funds and human resources and it accomplishes nothing. It only serves Israel’s enemies. Why do the IDF, the Minister of Defense and the Prime Minister’s Office support it?

January 7, 2019 | 9 Comments »

Leave a Reply

9 Comments / 9 Comments

  1. Is the IDF Ready for All-Out War?

    BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 1,060, January 10, 2019

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Israeli military’s state of readiness has dramatically improved, but it has a lot more catching up to do. It has spent years neglecting the ground forces – and those forces will be essential if enemies like Hezbollah are to be decisively defeated.

  2. This in today’s Jerusalem Post:

    Five IDF soldiers arrested for beating Palestinians
    The five, who serve in the ultra-Orthodox Netzach Yehuda Battalion, will be brought to Military Court today to face charges.

    IDF forces have carried out dozens of arrests as part of the effort to capture the terrorist As’am B
    IDF forces have carried out dozens of arrests as part of the effort to capture the terrorist As’am Barghouti who carried out the shooting attack in Givat Assaf. . (photo credit: IDF SPOKESMAN’S UNIT)
    The military police arrested an Israeli platoon commander and four combat soldiers on Wednesday for allegedly beating two Palestinians who they had detained, the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit said.

    The five, who serve in the Netzah Yehuda Battalion, will be brought to a military court today to face charges.

    During a military court hearing, the court extended the detention for the officer until Sunday and for the combat soldiers until Tuesday.
    While the military did not provide a date when the beating took place, the two Palestinians who had been arrested – and were then beaten – were detained in the Ramallah area as part of the army’s efforts to locate As’am Barghouti, who killed two soldiers from the Netazah Yehuda battalion outside the West Bank outpost of Givat Assaf.

    The military is investigating whether the soldiers had been motivated by revenge for their comrades killed in the deadly attack.

    According to a report by Haaretz, one of the Palestinians was badly beaten and needed urgent medical care. He could not be interrogated.

    The Netzah Yehuda battalion, which was established 20 years ago, is made up of religious soldiers ranging from ultra-Orthodox Israelis to new immigrants to those who identify with the settler movement.

    In the past couple of years, the battalion – which operates mainly in the West Bank – has been involved in a number of violent incidents where soldiers have been accused of severe abuse including violent beatings and even electrocuting Palestinians who are in their custody.

    Haredi activist to run in labour elections, January 3, 2019 (Courtesy)

    In mid-December, two soldiers from the battalion attempted to release settlers who had been arrested by Border Police for throwing stones at Palestinian homes. As a result, a fight broke out between the soldiers and border police force, leading to their suspension pending a joint investigation of the incident by the IDF and the Border Police.

    In 2016, a soldier from the battalion was sentenced to nine months in prison and demoted to the rank of private after he was convicted by a military court of using a medical device to shock two Palestinian prisoners in the neck. Another soldier filmed the abuse on his cellphone, showing the victim handcuffed and blindfolded.

    Around the same time another soldier was convicted for beating a Palestinian detainee from the West Bank village of Safarin by hitting and kicking him.

    In 2014, reforms passed in the Knesset aimed to gradually increase ultra-Orthodox recruitment was met with stiff opposition from many in the religious community who has historically been exempt from military service.

    According to the military, there continues to be an increase in haredim who draft into the IDF. In 2017, 3,100 such soldiers enlisted in the IDF, after 2,850 were recruited in 2016.
    Hagay HaCohen contributed to this report.

    Still more evidence of the iDF’s pro-Arab and anti-Orthodox Jewish bias. The IDF’s military police, along with the Border Police, has used similar methods to those that these soldiers are accused of when repressing Jewish demonstrators. And no one arrested those soldiers.

  3. This from Arutz Sheva. While supporting Arab land claims in Judea-Samaria, the IDF is unprepared for war with the Arabs:

    Retiring army ombudsman reveals IDF’s ‘deepest secret’
    Yitzhak Brick asserts IDF is severely unprepared for war. ‘If there’s a war, the trauma of Yom Kippur will feel like a walk in the park.’

    Yitzhak Brick
    Gen. (res.) Yitzhak Brick, the IDF ombudsman who retired today, warned that the IDF is deliberately closing its eyes to its lack of preparedness for war.

    “If there is a war, the trauma of Yom Kippur will be a walk in the park in comparison,” Brick said in an interview with Kan 11.

    He added, “We are building the army into a situation where it can give an answer to two threats: Lebanon and Gaza. There seems to have been a change in the Middle East, the Syrians have returned. The main threat that has not been taken into consideration is near us. Our army is built for a region-and-a-half. How do you build an army without taking changes in the Middle East into consideration? It’s irresponsible at a national level.”

    Brick doesn’t hold back criticism for the IDF. “The deepest secret of the army, that they do everything to keep safe, is that what happens in the army stays there. They have been doing it with amazing success until today, until this Brick comes and bursts the bubble.”

    The outgoing chief of staff, Gadi Eizenkot, also took a hit from the retiring ombudsman: “As a chief of staff, the very fact that the system was not managed, that there was no supervision and monitoring – he did not enforce these things. This is a failure.”

  4. This is from the website of the spme organization, (Scholars for Peace in the Middle East), who reprinted it from the Jerusalem Post. Written by Tovah Lazaroff, one of the Post’s better reporters:

    Irish Senate Approves Bill Criminalizing West Bank Settlement Activity
    In Dublin, senators stood and applauded after the vote.

    By TOVAH LAZAROFF January 2, 2019 Source: Jerusalem Post Originally published on 12/05/2018
    In Dublin, senators stood and applauded after the vote.
    Main façade of Leinster House where the Irish Senate meets
    Main façade of Leinster House where the Irish Senate meets. (photo credit: COURTESY OF JEAN HOUSEN)
    In a watershed moment, the Irish Senate (Seanad Éireann) approved a bill to criminalize West Bank settlement activity on Wednesday, thereby taking a stand both against European Union policy and its own government.

    This is an “historic, momentous occasion,” said Irish Senator Frances Black, who had submitted the private member’s bill that now goes to the House (Dáil Éireann) for approval before it is passed into law.

    The senate vote puts Ireland on track to become the first European Union country to end trade with Judea and Samaria, as well as with Jewish areas of Jerusalem over the pre-1967 lines.

    Israel’s Foreign Ministry said that the Irish Senate had approved “the most extreme anti-Israel piece of legislation in Europe.”

    The ministry added: “This bill will not help a single Palestinian and is aimed at negating the historical connection between the people of Israel and the birthplace of the Jewish people.”

    In Dublin, senators stood and applauded after the vote.

    “I feel so emotional and so proud,” Black said.

    She almost seemed to burst into tears as she thanked those who had supported the measure, which imposes a fine of up to 250,000 euros or five years in jail for those found guilty of such activity.

    “I know just how much it means to the Palestinian people to know that someone out there cares. Today we sent a strong signal that Ireland will always stand on the side of international law and justice,” Black said.

    This “is not a radical ask. If we know that certain goods are produced as the result of war crimes, then we should not be trading in them. How can we keep condemning the settlements as illegal while trading in the proceeds of this crime,” Black said.

    Prior to the vote, a representative of the government warned the senate that the legislation was contrary to EU law and “requires the state to do something which is not in its power.” The attorney-general has also warned against it, she said.

    Goods from West Bank settlements can only be excluded by the EU and not by an individual member state. “This is the essence of the EU single market,” the representative stated.

    The bill “would expose the state to legal action by the European Commission and parties adversely affected by the bill,” the representative said.

    She noted that the bill would have little impact on settler goods, because the volume of trade with east Jerusalem and West Bank settlements is low. But it would harm Irish businesses, particularly those in the US, which could find themselves placed between incompatible legislative demands,” she said.

    It would also marginalize Ireland in any peace process, the representative said.

    She clarified that the government opposed settlement activity. But the boost it would give to the Palestinians would quickly be turned into a victory for the settlers when the European Court of Justice ruled that the legislation was “in breach of EU law,” she said.

    A number of senators who spoke against the bill said they did so solely because they backed the government’s position and clarified that their stance should not be interpreted as support for settlement activity.

    Supporters of the bill were quick to state they were not “antisemitic.”

    Senator David Norris said that “this is a great day for this country. We are the first country and I hope we won’t be the last” to break ranks with the EU. “You will never get unanimity in the EU. The Germans have such conscience about the Holocaust [that] they are never going to do anything.

    “There is a rather nasty campaign by the Israeli government against this bill,” he said.

    Norris compared Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Gilad Erdan with Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels, charging that he was leading a “Goebbels-style” propaganda campaign on the web, specifically on Facebook.

    This included a 10-minute video of a young Palestinian girl repeatedly stabbing, with a voice over that said, “Palestinian children are trained to hate.” Specifically, Norris said, this video has popped up on Facebook feeds of those who support Black’s legislation.

    “I just wanted to point out that this kind of Goebbels-style operation is going on from the Israelis,” he said.

    Israel’s Foreign Ministry has charged that the bill is discriminatory because it only uses international court decisions against Israel and excludes other cases of “disputed territories.”

    “It is a dangerous piece of legislation as it gives the Palestinians the illusion that external coercion can actually replace negotiations. It encourages Palestinians to continue supporting terrorism instead of engaging in direct negotiations,” the ministry said.

    “Sadly, if this legislation becomes a law it will be counter-productive, as it seeks to close doors for Israelis but will only succeed to close the door on any future input that Ireland could have in a peace process in the Middle East,” the Foreign Ministry said.

    As Moshe Dann points out, Israel’s upholding of Arab’s false claims of land ownership only encourages the foreign BDS’ers, such as the Parliament of Ireland.

  5. @ yamit82: The Jordanian land registry should not be considered legal because the Jordanians never had a legally valid claim to sovereignty over the land. They were simply military occupiers for a brief time. The Ottaman land registries are relevant. But no Ottaman deed has ever been produced by the Arabs claiming to own the “privately owned land” to prove that they actually do own the land. Not one claimant has ever produced a title deed to even one durum of the land that the Israeli Supreme Court has ruled is “privately owned Arab land.” As Mr. Dann explains, Jews are not even allowed by the civil administration to examine the land registers, although Arabs are. And the Jews living on the land are not allowed by the court to appear before it to dispute the Arabs’ claims or put forward their own claims. THe most vicious type of racial discrimination imaginable against Jews. Self-administered anti-semitism.

  6. @ david melech: All very relevant points, David. As I explain in my earlier posts, no documentary evidence has ever been produced in a court of law that any of this supposed “privately owned Arab land” ever was owned by an Arab. Nothing from any land register. Nothing.Not even Jordanian land deeds have been produced in court. The Israeli Supreme Court has ruled that Jordanian laws apply and must be enforced by the “Civil administration” (actually a military administration). Allegedly, some of this “privately owned Arab land” was given to the Arabs by the Jordanian occupation authorities between 1949 and 1967, according to the civil administration. But eve these alleged title deeds, which would be illegal even if they exist, have ever been produced in court or even published anywhere. The lie of “privately owned Arab land” has simply been manufactured by Palestinian Arabs and pro-Palestinian Israeli organizations such as Peace Now and B’stelem, then ratified and enforced by the Attorney General the Supreme Court, and the “civil administration, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. It has then been used by the civil administration to evict thousands of Jews from their homes, demolish their homes, and destroy whole Jewish villages. Barbarous! Treason!

    Somehow the Israeli public and pro-Israel people abroad must be made aware of this atrocious state of affairs–that control of Israel’s government has been hijacted by anti-Zionists who enforce illegal edicts that will inevitably result, in time, in Israel’s destruction.

  7. The Supreme Court has ruled that all land in Judea-Samaria is ‘privately owned Arab land,” unless the Attorney General, whom the Court appoints, can prove otherwise to their satisfaction. And the Attorney General, who is always an Arab sympathizer like the “justices” who appoint him, almost never attempts to prove that no Arab owns the land. The government can only dispute the Arab claims if the Attorney General agrees to dispute them.

    The following article in today’s Arutz Sheva refers to certain lawyers who are appointed by the Attorney General to insure that all government officials, including the Prime minister, obey the courts dictates:

    This from today’s Arutz Sheva:

    Comptroller warns against harming gatekeepers
    Share

    State Comptroller and Public Complaints Commissioner Yosef Shapira announced today that his ministry is preparing to conduct an audit that will deal with a range of aspects of cyberspace in connection with the upcoming election campaign.

    Speaking at the annual conference of the Institute of Internal Auditors, the retired judge also against harming gatekeepers, saying, “Maintaining the independence of gatekeepers – the judicial system, of law enforcement agencies and the state comptroller is the guarantee of our ability to live in one state despite the deep differences between the different groups in Israel.” He concluded, “We must not reach a situation in which the public will think that the decisions made by the country’s leaders stem from personal considerations and interests, because this is a clear recipe for the disintegration of society and the state.”

    The ‘gatekeepers” are “legal advisors” appointed by the Attorney General , who is appointed by the Supreme, with the power to veto any action by athe Prime Minister or other cabinet members or ddeputy cabinet members that they or the attorney general disapprove of. In theory, they are supposed to veto actions only on legal grounds, but in practice they often veto them simply because they disagree with them on political grounds. And they are increasingly open about this. They are also tasked by the AG to report to them any actions by the Prime Minister or cabinet members that they think might be a basis for prosecuting them. This is the origin of the current criminal investigation of Netanyahu. Criminal investigations of him, all of them on absurd charges that would be immediately thrown out of court by any impartial judge, have been continuous against him since 1996. Also,against Leiberman and many other cabinet members. This enables the AG and the Supremes to fire at their discretion any official whose policies they dislike, and/or to blackmail them into following pro-Arab, collaborationist policies.

    This is how the Supreme Court, the AG, and the lawyers assigned to “advise” the military command have been able to declare any land they wish to be declared “privately owned Arab land,” even if, as is nearly always the case, there is not a shred of evidence that any Arab ever owned it.

  8. @ david melech:

    Jews took the land from the Canaanite tribes and others took the Land from the Jews. Must recognize some minimal standards today and that is land registry under the Ottomans and Jordanians. By your standards, we should confiscate all Church property. (they don’t pay taxes anyway)

  9. MR Dann , what is private p land? Is land that was owned prior to 1917? Did the brits register land purchases? If so was that not illegal? What right did hashmits have to register land during their illegal occupation?
    But who fights for land legally purchased in the Golan area by Rothschild?