This may not be 100% correct. I am seeking clarification.
By Ted Belman
David Singer reminds me that his plan is the mirror image of the Plan put forward by the Peel Commission in 1937.
The Peel Commission recommended two sovereign independent States be established in Palestine:
1. An Arab State – consisting of Trans-Jordan (now called Jordan) – 77% of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine – united with part of the remaining 23% of the Mandate territory within which the reconstitution of the Jewish National Home was proposed in 1922
2. A Jewish State consisting of the remainder of the 23% of Palestine.
The only question is, what portion of J&S does the Palestinian state get to keep as part of their state.
And it seems, Boris Johnson, Britain’s Foreign Secretary, is on board:
Britain’s Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson – writing in the Daily Telegraph on 29 October 2017 – went even further:
“I have no doubt that the only viable solution to the conflict resembles the one first set down on paper by another Briton, Lord Peel, in the report of the Royal Commission on Palestine in 1937, and that is the vision of two states for two peoples.”
But considering that Jordan already has 77% of the Mandate and Israel 23%, why on earth should Israel give up any of her meagre portion to Palestine.
Like I say, Jordan is Palestine. Once this idea is accepted by more, how much, if any, of the remaining 23% should be much easier to negotiate. In fact when Mudar Zahran takes over Jordan, he will accept the Jordan River as the boundary between the two states.
@ Cathy:
Zahran = Don Quitoe.
Zahran speaks for he opposition. How many Jordanians support the opposition? If they are willing and numerous enough to stage a coup to topple the monarchy, we should help them with support.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Quite appropriate.
Roslyn Pine Said:
dreuveni Said:
{Comments like this always remind me of this Brecht poem altered to fit this context, Mad LIbs style, but I think the message is just as pertinent – SZ}
[“Mad Libs consist that has a short story on each page with many key words replaced with blanks. Beneath each blank is specified a lexical or other category, such as “noun”, “verb”, “place”, or “part of the body”.[11] One player asks the other players, in turn, to contribute some word for the specified type for each blank, but without revealing the context for that word. Finally, the completed story is read aloud. The result is usually comic, surreal and somewhat nonsensical.”
“Stern and Price’s original Mad Libs book gives the following sentence as an example:[12]”
“_____________! he said ________ as he jumped into his convertible
exclamation adverb
______ and drove off with his ___________ wife.”
noun adjective]'”
I see no value in trying to convince the doubters. Time will tell and the time is very short.
What guarantees are in place to insure that Zahran will be able to take over Jordan. Right now, that looks like wishful thinking. All the other factions will want their share of Jordan too and the probable result is civil war with Israel patching up the wounded as before.
First, it may be overly optimistic to think Zahran will take over.
If he does what guarantees are there that he will be able to keep his word, or will want to?
Don Quiote??