by CLARE M. LOPEZ, FSM October 12, 2016
Center VP for Research and Analysis Clare Lopez
The ‘Islamophobia’ industry’s all-out assault on free speech was on full display at the recent annual meeting of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Human Dimension Implementation Meeting (HDIM) in Warsaw, Poland. The Center’s VP for Research and Analysis Clare Lopez and Senior Fellow Stephen Coughlin attended the 26-27 September 2016 session, along with Debra Anderson, ACT! For America Chapter leader in Minnesota, Dave Petteys, ACT! Chapter leader from Colorado and key European colleagues Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolf from Austria, Henrik Clausen from Denmark, and Alain Wagner from France.
The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) is a 57-member regional security organization with representatives from North America, Europe and Asia. It describes itself as a ‘forum for political dialogue on a wide range of security issues’ whose approach encompasses ‘politico-military, economic and environmental, and human dimensions’. The Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) is an office within the OSCE that claims to be dedicated to democratic elections, respect for human rights, rule of law, tolerance, and non-discrimination.
Their stated overall objective is helping governments protect and promote human rights, fundamental freedoms and tolerance and non-discrimination, as well as to improve and strengthen democratic practices and institutions. Except that the actual theme of the two-day proceedings had a lot more to do with countering ‘hate crime,’ criminalizing ‘hate speech,’ and demonizing ‘Islamophobia’ and ‘Islamophobes’ than it did with genuinely championing the right to believe, live, and speak freely.
Of course, the campaign to shut down free speech when it’s about Islam is very much in line with the top agenda item of the OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation), which is to achieve the criminalization of criticism of Islam in national legal codes. Gagging criticism of Islam is also what the UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18 tries to do. Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton worked hard to make that happen in the U.S. and around the world when she promoted the Istanbul Process. The idea is to use existing laws against ‘incitement to violence,’ but in a novel way that applies a so-called ‘test of consequences.’ That is, if someone, somewhere, sometime decides what somebody said somewhere, sometime is offensive and then launches a ‘Day of Rage,’ or goes on a lawless rampage destroying property, injuring or killing people, guess whose fault that would be? Under the ‘test of consequences’ speech code, that would be the speaker.
Center Senior Fellow Stephen Coughlin
Notably, though, the Islamophobia crowd seemed to be very much on the defensive at this OSCE meeting. Their crouch-and-whine posture most likely had to do with the accelerating numbers of horrific Islamic terror attacks, whose trail of carnage and destruction is splashed across screens around the world for all to see. Along with those visuals comes increasing awareness on the part of more and more ordinary people that when they yell ‘Allahu Akbar,’ it doesn’t mean ‘Hail to the Redskins’: it means they are committing that attack in the name of Allah and Islam.
The ‘Islamophobia’ industry has neither the ability nor actual wish to stop jihad but it sure does wish so many were not putting ‘Allahu Akbar’ and Islamic terror together and then speaking out about it. The only recourse left to them is trying desperately to shut down free speech-including places like the U.S. where free speech is Constitutionally-protected. As CSP Senior Fellow Stephen Coughlin puts it:
This is a direct extraterritorial demand that non-Muslim jurisdictions submit to Islamic law and implement shariah-based punishment over time. In other words, the OIC is set on making it an enforceable crime for non-Muslim people anywhere in the world-including the United States-to say anything about Islam that Islam does not permit.
In other words, what they’re trying to do is enforce shariah’s law on slander – on us, on everyone, whether Muslim or not.
That effort at the Warsaw OSCE meeting went at it by various means: there was a great deal of emphasis on equating Islamophobia with ‘racism’ (but a new kind – not based on skin color), ‘bigotry,’ and violation of ‘human rights.’ Pouty complaints were heard about ‘feeling discriminated against,’ ‘marginalized,’ and the object of ‘hard looks’ because of wearing a hijab. When legal eagle Steve Coughlin and Danish defender Henrik Clausen demanded a specific legal definition of the term ‘Islamophobia,’ they were assailed for…you guessed it, ‘Islamophobia’! Needless to say, there was no legal definition forthcoming (because ‘everybody knows what it means’).
‘Islamophobia’ hysteria reached peak during the OSCE’s second day plenary session, where the Turkish General Secretary of the European Muslim Initiative for Social Cohesion (EMISCO), Bashy Qurayshi, came unglued with a plaintive wail that ‘Islamophobes’ who’d been permitted to infiltrate the OSCE were “lying, ranting and attempting to spread hatred at this conference.” He even threw in a reference to such ‘Islamophobes’ as ‘Nazis,’ at which point senior representatives at the OSCE head table actually broke into applause.
By way of counterpoint, however, it must be added that many delegates from Civil Society organizations throughout the OSCE membership area-including atheists, Baha’is, Christians, Jews, Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons-firmly pressed the case for free speech. We know that they took encouragement from our presence and outspokenness, even as we did from theirs.
The ‘Islamophobia’ crown went home from Warsaw in the sure knowledge that their attempts to silence free speech about Islam have stirred a gathering force of liberty’s champions who will not be silenced.
Since the Revolutionary Epoch the word liberal is pertinent to the angels not the political devils and one has to go back to the Merchant of Venice and other Shakespearian parallels to find liberal used as a pejorative of somebody’s private morals to mean sexually and financially easy going. There are more that enough historical characters who had no sense of ethics, morals, restraint – all pre Enlightenment such as King John who was therefore cornered into Magna Carta and Caligula who was assassinated and the polite version was the oh so personally pious Catholic Louis XIV – C’est legale parce que je le veut….
@ Frank Adam:
Extreme form of liberalism is characterized by AMORALITY. It translates into “what I can do and not what I may do”! It leads to moral equivalence and double standard. There is no more code of ETHICS. No more standard of reference, no value system.
“liberal – fascist” is a contradiction in terms!
Everything that is free and egalitarian in our thinking and politics is out of the civil liberal tolerance of the Enlightenment when the modern ideas about politics and civil government were articulated in the US Declaration of Independence , The US Constitution and the French Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Citizens usually known as the Rights of Man – all based on the Montesquieu theory of separation of powers and the Blackstone Commentaries on the Laws of England interpretations of the British Constitution as seen by 18th century Anglophiles and liberals who were risking their necks against the solid authoritarianism of kings and The Church. The present risks to Libertyare not from liberals but from determined and violent Moslem extremists who wish to establish government by clerics and canon law without elections that matter.
freedom of religion?
Trump needs to win to destroy the Obama-Clinton liberal-Fascist anti-West doctrine!
OSCE.. Another evil organization that claims to be: — dedicated to democratic elections, respect for human rights, rule of law, tolerance, and non-discrimination.
Yet it targets only free speech against Islam whilst ignoring the intolerance and hatred of Islam for all others. A plethora of despotic fascist undemocratic, human-rights violating governments, intolerance of others’ religions, Jihadist terrorism, 7th century savagery, oppressive, extreme violent acts based on Islamic Sharia Law against their own people and anyone who objects to their evil ways, even discrimination against women with FMG, child marriages, pedophilia, sodomy, rape, beheadings, lashings, amputations.
Oh yes! a truly hypocritical organization supporting an ideology that has enslaved the Middle East, most of North Africa and Asia and now wants to turn the free world into another hell-hole of oppression and never ending lawlessness, wars, death and destruction. But we mustn’t say that – it is just too true for the Islamists sensitive spirits.. So the OSCE wants us to Shhhhh.. Well No!