Burkini Bans and Jewish Democracy

By Evelyn Gordon, COMMENTARY

Image result for BURKINIS

The ban on wearing burkinis at the beach, which was recently enacted by some 30 French municipalities and even won support from French Prime Minister Manual Valls, was rightly deemed an unconstitutional infringement on several fundamental liberties by France’s highest court this weekend. Yet the French controversy highlights something about Israel that is too often overlooked: the degree to which being a Jewish state, far from undermining Israel’s democracy, actually reinforces it.

The burkini ban was enacted in explicit reaction to Islamist terror attacks in France and the concerns they have raised about the integration of the country’s Muslim minority. As Christian Estrosi, the deputy mayor of Nice, told the New York Times, these full-body swimsuits, worn mainly by religious Muslims, constitute “unacceptable provocations in the very particular context that our city is familiar with,” referring to a July 14 terror attack that killed 86 people.

Yet Israel has suffered far worse Islamist terror and over a far longer period of time. Terror attacks in France have killed 234 people over the last 18 months, according to one British newspaper’s tally. That is just over half the 452 Israelis killed by terror during the single worst year of the second intifada (2002). And since France’s population is 7.6 times the size of Israel’s, that means that as a proportion of the population, Israel’s losses during that one year–without even mentioning all its losses to terrorism in other years–were almost 15 times as large as France’s have been over the past 18 months.

Moreover, as a proportion of the total population, Israel’s Muslim community is much larger than that of France. Muslims comprise an estimated 7.5 percent of France’s population, but almost 20 percent of Israel’s population–and that’s counting only Israeli citizens and legal residents, i.e. the Muslims who would still be there even if Israel quit the West Bank tomorrow.

Finally, though Israel’s Muslim population has largely shunned terror, its leadership is actually far more radical than France’s Muslim leadership seems to be. Israeli Arab Knesset members openly back anti-Israel terror organizations, actively incite to anti-Israel terror, and tirelessly libel Israel overseas. The head of one of the country’s largest nongovernmental Muslim groups–Raed Salah, leader of the Islamic Movement’s northern branch, which has tens of thousands of supporters–routinely spews anti-Semitic blood libels such as accusing Jews of baking matzo with Christian blood. And all that is without even mentioning the Palestinian leadership in the territories, where both the main political parties, Fatah and Hamas, routinely deem killing Israelis to be their main accomplishment.

In other words, if any country were going to lash out in response to Islamist terror by restricting Muslims’ freedom to observe their religion in public, one would expect it to be Israel, not France. But in Israel, no one has ever even suggested banning burkinis. Nor has anyone ever suggested forbidding civil students or schoolgirls to wear headscarves, as stipulated by other French laws that the courts have upheld. Nor has anyone ever suggested barring mosques from building minarets–a law approved by popular referendum in Switzerland, even though that country has so far no had no Islamic terror problem at all.

Clearly, Israel’s religious tolerance can’t be attributed solely to its democratic norms. After all, France and Switzerland have impeccable democratic credentials, but that hasn’t stopped either from passing anti-Muslim laws. Nor is it because Israeli Arabs are a powerful enough minority to prevent such legislation: Arab Knesset members’ anti-Israel positions make them unacceptable as coalition partners in any government, and they would actually have no power to block anything the coalition majority wanted to pass. And it certainly isn’t because Israelis are saints who remain serenely forgiving of Arab terror and anti-Israel incitement; there’s plenty of anti-Arab sentiment in Israel.

Rather, the main reason why Israel never has and never would consider legislation like France’s bans on burkinis and headscarves is precisely because it is a Jewish state. In other words, it was created to take Jewish interests into account, and those interests include the freedom to observe traditional Jewish praxis. But the moment a democratic country starts making allowances for one religion’s traditions, those allowances inevitably spill over to other religions as well.

For instance, Israel could never ban headscarves in the civil service, because religious Jewish women also wear head coverings. It could never ban modest swimwear because religious Jews also insist on modest clothing. It could never ban minarets because the analogy to banning synagogues would be all too apparent. In contrast, France and Switzerland can do all those things, because they have no interest in accommodating any religion in the public square.

In short, Israel’s identity as both a Jewish and a democratic state is the main reason why Islamist terror has never prompted the kind of anti-Muslim legislation that it has in secular democratic France. So the next time someone tells you Israel’s Jewish identity is inherently at odds with its democratic identity, remember the burkini. And remember that sometimes, Israel’s Jewish identity is precisely what protects its democratic one.

August 30, 2016 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. My commen is, that if the 2 women inthe picture, the one in the bikini nd the other in the burkini swapped outfits, they’d both look better…to this eye anyway.

  2. How much evil can we swallow?’

    “Every day, it is further revealed to the public the extent of the terrible injustice perpetrated against us. A mask of framing, manipulation and lies whose only goal is to implicate my brother and destroy my family.

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/217182

    Yaalons legacy…. a war against the Jews.

    I think Yaalon got out the word that it was important for his military subordinates to convict Azariyah…. if not then Yaalons lucicrous “ethics” narratives would be revealed for the lies that they are and he would then be revealed as a criminal who used his authority publicly to interfere with the justice process. Yaalon needed the conviction of Azariyah to distract from his guilt, Mandebilt needs it to explain why he ignores Yaalons serial criminal behavior at Duma and with Azariyah… using the same MO to browbeat military investigators, prosecutors and judges towards a guilty finding… perhaps he let them know there would be no further military advancement for them if they dont…. perhaps Namaan was threatened with charges if Azariyah was not found guilty… how can we expect anything else from those who jumped up in unison at Duma to lie to the world that Jews burned a baby? Jews still in detention for the yaalon, erdan, rivlin and bb folly at duma….. they all need guilty jews or a light gets to shine on their own incompetence or crimnal behavior…… Yaalon slinked off to a foreign paid think tank and mandebilt has ceased his flurry of bs investigations meant to be red herrings to distract from their crimes.

  3. Speaking of Jewish democracy:

    Platoon commander: I also feared terrorist had a bomb
    Elor Azariya’s platoon commander confirms claims of fears over possible explosive device on wounded terrorist

    Azariya’s company commander, Tom Naaman, has dismissed his claims and testified against him in court…..

    The platoon commander also testified that Naaman was reprimanded following the shooting incident, but was unaware of the reason for the censure.

    Azariya had in testimony claimed that Naaman struck him following the shooting incident

    soldiers who were later questioned in regards to the case had been told by their commanding officers that the “incident was very serious”.

    all platoon commanders in the company had been ordered to discuss the incident with the soldiers under their command and impress upon them the severity of the situation.

    When asked why such discussions were held before the investigation had finished interviewing soldiers in connection with the incident, the platoon commander replied that those were the orders that he and other platoon commanders had received.

    asking if he did not see discussions intended to emphasize the seriousness of the incident as creating a bias in soldiers who were yet to be questioned,

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/217070

    It is so obvious to me that Yaalon did everything he possibly could to make sure that all his military subordinates got the message that he wanted them to find the soldier guilty. Yaalon used his position of authority to conduct a lynch mob on the soldier just as he did at Duma where he declared to the world that jews burned a baby with NO evidence and NO support.

    Yaalons serial criminal abuse of authority and interference with the justice process goes uninvestigated by Mandebilt who had a whole flurry of fake investigations to create a cloud of obfuscation under which the serial criminal could escape.

    Here is what I see: a higher up told Naaman that he could be in trouble if he did not implicate azariya… and at the least would never be promoted if he did not play ball.

    The entire culture of the IDF under Yaalon was subverted to political means… lets face it… if Azariya is not found guilty then Yaalon cannot be vindicated for his fake ethics red herrings used to cover his serial crimes. If azariya is not found guilty can mandebilt continue to ignore yaalons obvious serial crimes? And if Yaalon is indicted for his transparent and obvious subversion of justice and abuse of his military command to instruct his subordinates to subvert justice…. then what about BB, Erdan and Rivlin who jumped up with yaalon at Duma to falsely declare to the world that Jews burned babies? Isnt yaalon just following his instructions from BB? What about all those Jews who were murdered because those 4 told the world that jews burned a baby at Duma?

    What a stinking corrupt gov that will use a soldier to be their patsy as a fig leaf for their incompetent, or in Yaalons case, criminal behavior. Who is still rotting in admin detention because of Yaalons fairy tales? Can anyone remember what these corrupt criminals did?

  4. typically French to engage in superficiality, triviality and the meaningless, it reminds me of their phony war:

    Burkinis dont kill anyone or commit terrorism… but sure as shooting Muslims do… Ban muslims, burkinis are irrelevant to the terror issue. Looks like the french want to pretend they are doing something other than their usual cowardly wanking.