Tribalism Drives Middle East Violence

by Philip Carl Salzman, Independent Journal Review

Take a look at recent news reports from around the Arab world and you’ll notice an unusual commonality. Egypt’s government “struggles to rally Sinai tribes,” reads one Reuters headline, while the title of a Gulf News article recounts that former Yemeni president Ali Abdullah Saleh “fears tribes will shift allegiance” to his successor, Abd Rabbo Mansour Hadi. TheOxford Research reports on the “local, tribal and fragmented” nature of militia power in Libya. CNN covers a U.S. special forces mission to “accompany tribal, Arab and Kurdish forces” in Syria. From the BBC, “Iraqi tribes clash with jihadists in IS stronghold of Falluja.” The UAE daily The National proudly notes the “tribal and military influences” in local designer Huda Al Nuaimi’s spring/summer 2016 collection.

Ok, you get the idea – tribalism is big in the Arab world. And while it has grown more noticeable with the collapse and weakening of Arab governments in recent years, the trend is not new. The same north Arabian Bedouin tribes that accepted Islam and spread it by the sword also infused the region with a deeply tribal culture, impacting everything from family relations to governance and conflict.

The Arab world’s deeply tribal culture impacts everything from family relations to governance and conflict.

Tribal affiliation is based on descent from a common male ancestor; all descendants are deemed to share common interests and to have obligations of solidarity with one another. Descendants of other ancestors are deemed to have different interests and are seen to be opponents, sometimes enemies.

The main principle of tribal life is absolute loyalty to one’s lineage group vis-à-vis other groups of the same order and scope: clan vs. clan, tribe vs. tribe, confederation vs. confederation, sect vs. sect, Muslims vs. infidels. Middle Easterners believe that they can count only on their own group to protect their interests. They understand well the motto, “all for one, and one for all.” This principle is so basic to tribal thinking that, for most people, it is an assumption about life that goes without saying.

Tribesmen are accorded honour based on fulfilling their obligations to the tribe. These tribal characteristics shape the basic assumptions and attitudes of Middle Easterners who inherited their cultural foundation from Bedouin. Islam, arising through the adoption by Bedouin, reflects the structures of tribal life, especially in the opposition between Muslims and infidels.

Middle Easterners looking at their increasingly chaotic world and deciding how they must respond think immediately of their kin group upon which they depend for all things, and other descent groups which are by their structural nature opponents and potential enemies, and from which they can expect nothing good. Opposition, rivalry, and conflict are thus seen to be in the nature of social life. Success, power, wealth, and, above all, honour derives from triumphing over opposition groups. Failure to triumph means the loss of power, wealth, and, above all, honour.

The Arab Middle East is missing the cultural tools for building inclusive, unified states.

The pervasive and continuous conflict in the Middle East–between clans, tribes, sects, and religions–is a manifestation of this culture. Middle Eastern history is largely a record of tribal conflicts and displacements, expansions and conquests, and invasions and dynastic replacements. “The Arabs are not in a wretched state – they are in a tribal state, and they are doing what they have been doing since time immemorial: conquering each other, demanding allegiance, and living in a state of perpetual war,” writes analyst Hussain Abdul-Hussain. “The only difference now is that the Arabs are feuding in cities, and on TV and social media instead of in the desert.”

The Arab Middle East is missing the cultural tools for building inclusive, unified states. The West saw violent upheaval for millennia before it began stabilizing with acceptance of modern organizing principles, such as constitutionalism and rule of law, in the past few hundred years. Unfortunately, there are few signs that the Middle East will follow suit anytime soon.

Philip Carl Salzman is a professor of anthropology at McGill University and a fellow at the Middle East Forum.

April 2, 2016 | 4 Comments »

Leave a Reply

4 Comments / 4 Comments

  1. adamdalgliesh Said:

    Ted Belman’s claims that Obama was once a homosexual prostitute in unsubstantiated.

    I dont know about a prostitute but apparently there were 3 murders of homosexuals who implicated him. Also, the rev wright church is rumored to be a “church” which links gay black men on the “down low” with black women so they can have upward mobility. You can google these and WND has articles on this also.adamdalgliesh Said:

    His assertion that he was never baptized contradicts Obama’s claim in his second auto biography that the Reverend Wright baptized him.

    his claims are suspect as he has not released many records eg school etc and he ran on “transparency”. The wright “church” is suspect as a church as apparently it has many muslims.
    adamdalgliesh Said:

    How does Belman know that Obama’s statement on this point is false.

    the source of the statement lacks credibility and transparency, in fact he never really debunked the birther stories as his very late long form certificate was ruled a photoshop by a forgery expert who also did work for the a law firm that Obama used.
    adamdalgliesh Said:

    Worst of all Belman posted a fictional piece

    did you prove it fictional?
    adamdalgliesh Said:

    Bellman undermines his credibility and that of Israpundit when he lets himself be hoodwinked so readily.

    no, not hoodwinked… it is more likely that his “baptism” is a taqiyya action to get ahead and work for islam… this would be allowable under islam. Also we have no evidence that he was “baptized” or that the baptism nullified his being a muslim.
    Both his father and stepfather were muslims and he was raised a muslim in indonesia. His word is unacceptable and without credibility.

  2. Ted Belman’s claims that Obama was once a homosexual prostitute in unsubstantiated. His assertion that he was never baptized contradicts Obama’s claim in his second auto biography that the Reverend Wright baptized him. How does Belman know that Obama’s statement on this point is false. Worst of all Belman posted a fictional piece written by the well-known internet satirist and hoaxer Paul Horner, in which Horner claimed to be a retired secret service man who had guarded Obama in the White House, and to have witnesses him inviting fifteen men a night into his bedroom for sex, and performing Muslim prayers in traditional Muslim robes. Horner has written hundreds of fictitious “news articles” since 1913, and his internet site, News Examiner, publishes only fictitious stories. Bellman undermines his credibility and that of Israpundit when he lets himself be hoodwinked so readily.

  3. The notion that the Middle East is plagued by tribalism doesn’t make much sense. Sure, tribalism plays a role, but the major conflicts are not between tribes. The major conflicts are of two kinds:
    1) Between Moslem Sunnis and Moslem Shiites
    2) Between Moslems and non-Moslems.