T. Belman. Thus both Russia and the US want Syria not to be divided into separate countries. Perhaps a federation though. This may result in Iran losing its influence when Assad goes. My guess is that Russia is agreeing to the ultimate departure of Assad in part because it wants to please Saudi Arabia.
MOSCOW, March 25. Moscow is explaining in its contacts with Kurds that Syria is an indivisible country that should not be broken into parts, Russia’s presidential envoy on the Middle East and North Africa, Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov told reporters on Friday.
“Our task is to help Kurds, to find common ground, common approaches. National Syrian interests should prevail over all others,” Bogdanov said. “They should proceed from the fact that Syria should not be broken apart as it will be bad for Syrians themselves,” he added.
The diplomat noted that Russia maintains good relations and contacts with Kurds. “We maintain good contacts with Kurds. We keep in touch not only with Democratic Union Party and several other parties and organizations,” he said.
For those familiar with the Rojava Revolution, the advanced nature of the above recent declaration comes as no surprise.
The following is the preamble to the Rojavan Social Contract – a kind of provisional constitution which was adopted on 29th January 2014. From http://civiroglu.net/the-constitution-of-the-rojava-cantons/ :-
Bold emphases mine.
For the avoidance of doubt – if for some bizarre reason there still is any – I reproduce Article 12:-
It must be asked:- What decent Human Being wouldn’t support what the Rojavans are attempting to achieve?
It would appear that Bogdanov’s comments are really quite redundant, and that he’s merely deploying rhetoric consistent with his role as a statist functionary operating under the colour of legitimacy embedded in the cutesy term “International Community”.
Why? Because Bogdanov simply MUST realise that the “Syrian Kurds” – really the Rojavans, who are successfully implementing a truly multi-ethnic and gender-equal society in the autonomous regions they control – have no intention of “dividing Syria”. Quite the opposite, in fact.
Here is their recent declaration of Federalism, from http://peaceinkurdistancampaign.com/federal-democratic-union-of-rojavanorthern-syria/
Bold emphases mine.
Considering the highly democratic and highly inclusive nature of this declaration, one is entitled to ask why it is that the Assad regime, its Islamist opposition, the US, and now Russia (it would seem) are ALL united in opposing it, and misrepresenting it as “Kurds being divisive”?
Could it be that these outfits are actually all rather regressive, and that they view real democracy and inclusiveness as a threat?