T. Belman. When Obama came into office I wrote Obama Plans to Impose a Solution on Israel. Here it comes. But just passing a resolution in the UNSC doesn’t make it so on the ground. The UN has no jurisdiction to do that. I also wrote Can the UN legally impose a solution on Israel. If the UN passes a Chapter VII resolution declaring our rejection of such resolution as “a threat to peace” then it can order sanctions and military force. They have already primed the pump by6 continually calling the Arab/Israel conflict a threat to peace.
With about 10 months left in office, President Barack Obama is considering unprecedented moves to implement a two-state solution, according to a Wall Street Journal report.
Senior US officials revealed that the President is looking to initiate a final negotiated settlement between Israel and the Palestinian Authority using United Nations Security Council resolutions, a step that would obligate not only Israel and the Palestinian Authority, but effectively determine the direction of US policy for the president’s successor as well.
The report comes ahead of Vice President Joe Biden’s visit to Israel on Tuesday, where he is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and senior Palestinian Authority officials.
On Monday, the Prime Minister’s Office reported that Netanyahu’s annual trip to the US, planned for later this month, had been cancelled. Israeli officials remarked that the cancellation was in part due to President Obama’s refusal to schedule a meeting with the Prime Minister. Later on Monday, the White House issued a statement denying those claims, asserting that the president had in fact invited the Israeli leader to talks during his visit.
According to the plan described by senior US officials, Obama is considering reviving the dormant Middle East Quartet, a diplomatic body including the US, UN, EU, and Russia, to apply pressure to Israel and the Palestinian Authority to resume active negotiations.
The President is also considering use of a United Nations Security Council resolution to forcibly extract concessions from Israel and the PA. The US has until now vetoed any such resolutions, though Mr. Obama has in the past threatened to allow them to pass.
A Security Council resolution would be binding upon all parties, unlike General Assembly measures which are non-obligatory recommendations. Such a resolution would remain in force even after the president leaves office next January, effectively shaping the future of American policy in the region for Mr. Obama’s successors.
The resolution would require Israel cease construction over the Green Line and would force Israel to recognize eastern Jerusalem as the capital of Palestine.
At the same time, the Palestinian Authority would be obliged to officially recognize Israel as a Jewish state and would be pressured to give up the long-standing demand for a right of return.
What does Eugene Kontorovich has to say?
@ babushka:Certainly not Hillary or Bernie.
Cruz or Kaisch would work just fine with me. Otherwise it is anyone but Hillary or Bernie even Trump.
@ SHmuel HaLevi 2:
How correct you are we did not vote for Obama. If they actually pass a resolution it will not be worth the paper it is written on.
They also passed Zionism is Racism back in the day. The general assembly gave the Pals a virtual state.
It will not change one thing on the ground.
It is time to take the bull by the horns and start annexing Jewish Towns in Judah/Samaria as a first step.
Been looking into the subject and we did not find evidence that the Muslim in the White House was elected to govern Israel… Correct me if I am wrong…
Sooo… How about this?
Shalom there don Hussein!
We suggest that you should stick to conniving in the US. And don Barrack, stay away from the Jewish people, the Land of Israel and our ancestral Icons.
Then again all such specimens take it for granted that the local renegades can be bought to do Obama’s bidding or at least try again.
Surely Biden will tap the Peres and his follow up Rivlin, Hertzog-Livni and… ahem… who else could he “pressure”? Lets guess.
Kinda makes it ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL that the next American president is not neutral, eh boys?