UN resolution: Israel must renounce nuclear arms

JEWSNEWS

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The U.N. General Assembly overwhelmingly approved an Arab-backed resolution Tuesday calling on Israel to renounce possession of nuclear weapons and put its nuclear facilities under international oversight.

The resolution, adopted in a 161-5 vote, noted that Israel is the only Middle Eastern country that is not party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. It called on Israel to “accede to that treaty without further delay, not to develop, produce test or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons, to renounce possession of nuclear weapons” and put its nuclear facilities under the safeguard of the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency.

The United States, Canada, Palau and Micronesia joined Israel in opposing the measure, while 18 countries abstained.

Israel is widely considered to possess nuclear arms but declines to confirm it.

The resolution, introduced by Egypt, echoed a similar Arab-backed effort that failed to gain approval in September at the Vienna-based IAEA. At the time, Israel criticized Arab countries for undermining dialogue by repeatedly singling out the Jewish state in international arenas. Israel’s U.N. Mission did not immediately return a request for comment Tuesday.

The U.N. resolution, titled “The risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East,” pushed for the establishment of a nuclear weapons-free zone in the Middle East and lamented that U.S.-backed efforts to convene talks were abandoned in 2012.

Israel has long argued that a full Palestinian-Israeli peace plan must precede any creation of a Mideast zone free of weapons of mass destruction. The country also argues that Iran’s alleged work on nuclear arms is the real regional threat. Iran denies pursuing such weapons.

General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding but carry moral weight because it is the only body where all 193 U.N. member states are represented.

U.S. representative Robert Wood, in voting against the resolution at the committee-level last month, said the measure “fails to meet the fundamental tests of fairness and balance. It confines itself to expressions of concern about the activities of a single country.”

Wood said the U.S. will continue pushing a Middle East free of weapons of mass destructions, but he warned that such resolutions only undermine prospects for progress.

February 24, 2015 | 6 Comments »

Leave a Reply

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. Not sure if you are aware of this but, if you track the links back, the date of publication is December 2, 2014. So this didn’t just happen last Tuesday.

  2. In a world that lacks morality, the only moral weight that I recognize is that which serves my self-sufficiency and self-defense. I would argue that the same standard applies to the Jewish nation and the Jewish state, lest we repeat in the future what always has happened to Jews in the past.

    Arnold Harris
    Mount Horeb WI

  3. Israel should abide by this non-binding General Assembly Resolution and dismantle its putative nuclear weapons with the same zeal as Iran did with five (5) binding Security Council resolutions.

  4. Israel has long argued that a full Palestinian-Israeli peace plan must precede any creation of a Mideast zone free of weapons of mass destruction.

    Already out of date, europes anti semitism and stalking of Israel demonstrate that WMD may be needed in the future to target Europe

    General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding but carry moral weight because it is the only body where all 193 U.N. member states are represented.

    😛 😛 😛 😛
    the moral weight of a lynch mob