Islam is the enemy

Fighting the Ideology

ideologyIslamism is a growing and powerful ideology that tolerates no dissent or rivalry. Yet in recent decades the United States has responded only to the violence that Islamism has generated, not to the beliefs and ideas that drive it. As a result of this failure, Islamist numbers and confidence have grown, and Islamist regimes have taken power in the Middle East and North Africa. So the United States is less safe than it was before 9/11, as is everyone else outside the Islamist fold.

Until the United States understands and confronts Islamist ideology, it will not be able to slow the Islamist revolution and its destructive effects. This collection of essays proposes an effective strategy for countering and defeating the beliefs that motivate Islamists. It examines those beliefs in detail, considers their strengths and weaknesses, and draws on the lessons of past ideological conflicts. Thus it provides invaluable equipment for the war of ideas in which we must now engage.

July 2, 2014 | 6 Comments »

Leave a Reply

6 Comments / 6 Comments

  1. I think BB should read BB!!!

    How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists

    Benjamin Netanyahu

    In this innovative and concise work, Israeli politician Benjamin Netanyahu offers a compelling approach to understanding and fighting the increase in domestic and international terrorism throughout the world. Citing diverse examples from around the globe, Netanyahu demonstrates that domestic terrorist groups are usually no match for an advanced technological society which can successfully roll back terror without any significant curtailment of civil liberties. But Netanyahu sees an even more potent threat from the new international terrorism which is increasingly the product of Islamic militants, who draw their inspiration and directives from Iran and its growing cadre of satellite states. The spread of fundamentalist Islamic terrorism, coupled with the possibility that Iran will acquire nuclear weapons, poses a more frightening threat from an adversary less rational and therefore less controllable than was Soviet Communism. How democracies can defend themselves against this new threat concludes this provocative book.

  2. It’s Not the ‘Occupation’ —- It’s Islam

    It’s not about physical territory. It’s about spiritual territory. It’s not about nationalism. It’s about Islamism.

    It’s not about the “Occupation.” It’s about Islam.

    Not a Palestinian nation. Not a Two State Solution. Not forty percent of this and sixty percent of that.

    The victory of Islam.

  3. The title is correct, so why do you change to an euphemism in the body of the article? No need to make islam more “palatable” for the readers by calling it names. What we are witnessing is the resurgence of islam in the vacuum created by an ever appeasing blind-deaf West.