Let them go. The C of P is organized on the principle of one vote for each organization. This works to the disadvantage of Reform who have the most members by far. The C of P would have no purpose if it didn’t embrace a certain viewpoint. It cannot represent everyone because of how diverse their opinions are. The ZOA presents an independent policy and will no be silenced. Neither will any other Zionist organization. Similarly the Reform should get together with J Street and other like minded organizations and do their thing. One Organization cannot speak for all Jews in the US. Ted Belman
WASHINGTON — Declaring that the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations needs an overhaul, the Union for Reform Judaism said leaving the umbrella body could be an option
The Reform group posted a statement Thursday on its website in the aftermath of the Presidents Conference rejecting J Street in its bid for membership on Wednesday.
“As of yesterday, it is clear that the Conference of Presidents, as currently constituted and governed, no longer serves its vital purpose of providing a collective voice for the entire American Jewish pro-Israel community,” URJ President Rick Jacobs said in the statement.
“In the days ahead, Reform movement leaders will be consulting with our partners within the Conference of Presidents to decide what our next steps will be. We may choose to advocate for a significant overhaul of the Conference of Presidents’ processes. We may choose to simply leave the Conference of Presidents. But this much is certain: We will no longer acquiesce to simply maintaining the facade that the Conference of Presidents represents or reflects the views of all of American Jewry.”
The departure of the umbrella body for Reform movement congregations, which bills itself as the largest single Jewish organization in the United States with 900 congregations representing 1.5 million Jews, could undercut the Presidents Conference’s claim to speak for the community on foreign policy.
On Wednesday, Presidents Conference members voted 22-17 with three abstentions against admitting J Street, a Jewish group that calls itself “pro-peace and pro-Israel.” J Street has criticized Israeli government policies on peace and backed the Obama administration’s nuclear talks with Iran that many Jewish groups have opposed.
Separately, Rabbi Julie Schonfeld, the executive vice president of the Conservative movement’s Rabbinical Assembly, said her group also would seek an overhaul.
“The Conference of Presidents has 50 or so organizations, each one has one vote, the majority of those organizations are quite tiny,” she told JTA. “The fact that J Street did not pass today’s vote is reflective of structural anomalies of the conference.”
A source close to the Presidents Conference said it was not clear from the secret ballot that J Street’s rejection was driven by the smaller groups, and that previous attempts to change the system failed in part because members could not agree on criteria that would determine the proportional weight of a member organization.
J Street failed to gain admission to the Conference because it needed a two-thirds majority of the entire membership, 34 out of 51, in order to be admitted. After the results were announced, the organization said it was “disappointed” that its bid had been rejected.
“This is a sad day for us, but also for the American Jewish community and for a venerable institution that has chosen to bar the door to the communal tent to an organization that represents a substantial segment of Jewish opinion on Israel,” it said in a statement.
“We applied to the Conference of Presidents because we value Jewish community and the concept of a broad tent of pro-Israel organizations that truly represents our community’s diversity and dynamism. Unfortunately, our bid was thwarted by organizations on the right of the community who do not share those same values.”
A number of leading Jewish groups had come out in favor of the dovish Middle East policy group’s entry into the Jewish community’s foreign policy umbrella, including the Anti-Defamation League, arms of the Reform and Conservative movements and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the community’s domestic policy umbrella.
Those groups had argued that the Presidents Conference needed to include what they say is the community’s diverse opinions on Israel.
The Presidents Conference said in a statement issued after the vote that its current membership reflected the community’s diversity.
“The present membership of the Conference includes organizations which represent and articulate the views of broad segments of the American Jewish community and we are confident that the Conference will continue to present the consensus of the community on important national and international issues as it has for the last fifty years,” it said.
J Street is a strong critic of the policies of the current Israeli government and backs the Obama administration’s policy of engagement with Iran, which many pro-Israel groups oppose.
Opponents said J Street too often opposes other Jewish groups in the broader public arena and not just within the community.
In its statement announcing the rejection of J Street, but not breaking down the vote, the Presidents Conference noted that other groups have failed to gain admission on the first try in the past.
“A two-thirds affirmative vote of the member organizations is a significant threshold,” the statement said. “Some present member organizations did not initially achieve the necessary support but subsequently re-applied and are now members.”
It also said that the process leading up to the vote was transparent.
“The process included three meetings of the Membership Committee, including one at which representatives of J Street made a presentation and answered questions,” it said. “Membership Committee representatives held additional meetings with J Street representatives.”
Read more: Reform movement may bolt Presidents Conf. in wake of J Street rejection | The Times of Israel http://www.timesofisrael.com/reform-movement-may-bolt-presidents-conf-in-wake-of-j-street-rejection/#ixzz30ZUPAoUg
Follow us: @timesofisrael on Twitter | timesofisrael on Facebook
BethesdaDog Said:
True that!!!!
This is the project I been asking Jews across America to help with for the past 6 years and I am getting nowhere:
The Israel Longhorn Project
Texas Longhorn cattle are cattle fit and thrive in desert environments. This is an educational, cattle crossbreeding project that is first helping Israel then if possible Jordan and East Africa.
Israeli Ranches are being attacked, their land being stolen and their passive European cattle are being mutilated and killed by local Arabs and by natural predators, wolves and jackals. Israeli European beef cattle are incompatible with Israel’s desert environment. This has resulted in many problems including high calf losses, (as high as 30%). Israel needs desert cattle that fits its environment and can defend it’s self and it’s calves. That breed of cattle is Texas Longhorn.
The Israel Longhorn Project,
Robin Rosenblatt, Ex Israeli Soldier, Ex Israeli Police Officer, past Anti Terrorist Agent
Director – The Longhorn Project;
Nonprofit 501(c) 3 #74-3177354;
Address: 815 Hill Street, # 5
Belmont, CA 94002
Tel: 650.631.9270 / 03.722.6108
robin@longhornproject.org
@ Bert:
You’re partially wrong about the Orthodox vs. non-Orthodox rationale. It’s much more complex. One does not need religious training to learn and understand right vs. wrong in the Middle East. The Vietnam era has so jaundiced many Americans to the use of power that they are no doubt afraid that Israel will drag the US into conflict. Also, simplemindedness has made the “Palestinian” narrative easy to swallow. Ask any American, including an American Jew, to discuss the flight of Jews from Arab countries. Crickets. I’m almost an atheist, I am not observant (although I respect the religious heritage and support those who are observant. I understand the plight of Israel and why JStreet and its allies are harmful. I am disgusted with the reform movement.
The Reform Movement has betrayed Israel and many of them are Jewish Traitors. JStreet is a Jewish Con organization that intends to destroy Israel.
The JStreet problem is another sign of the decline of the non orthodox part of American Jewry. Decades of neglect of Jewish education has opened the door to indoctrination from secular and anti-Jewish beliefs. Most Jews blindly support Democrats even when they are hostile to Israel and to Jewish values. The overwhelming Jewish vote for Obama in 2008 and again in 2012 is a clear sign of moral rot. The Jewish left, like all leftists, will use every dirty trick possible to seize power and pursue their hatred for Israel. But these atheistic traitors have no awareness of G-d’s role in all this and hence are blind to the danger facing themselves and to America from the evil of Obama and his ilk.
It would be interesting if somebody could do some research on the family backgrounds of the most active JStreet activists and leaders. I would want to know how many come from pink- and red-diaper backgrounds, which would explain their, at best, conflicted views, or downright antipathy, toward Israel. I would like to know how many come from even Bundist or similar backgrounds. Even if successful in the professions and business, they might still have this mentality as part of their family heritage. A lot of leftists and people of that stripe do become successful in business and accumulate wealth. A writer I knew analyzed the success of former communists and fellow travelers and suggested that the ruthlessness necessary to become a good totalitarian leftist served well even after abandoning leftwing activism and entering the business world. That’s why there is so much intolerance, deception and Machiavellianism in contemporary progressives and liberals who are often quite well off financially.