Defense Minister Ya’alon Gives Them Hell

He only said out loud what everyone is thinking

Att’y Steven M. Goldberg
The politically correct set in the United States State Department became enraged and almost hysterical when Defense Minister Moshe “Bougie” Ya’alon decided to “give them hell”.

That is, Ya’alon told the truth, and they “thought it was hell”.

Specifically, Ya’alon correctly pointed out that, as a result of American passivity, Russia has taken military action against the Ukraine, China has become more aggressive in southeast Asia, and Iran is continuing to march towards obtaining nuclear weapons capability.  

Minister Ya’alon accurately noted that the perception of the international community is that the United States is afflicted with “feebleness,” which is jeopardizing the current world order and undermining the security of the democratic nations, including the United States.

Suffering from grievously wounded feelings, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry reacted immediately.  He and others In the Obama Administrationtelephoned Prime Minister Netanyahu and demanded that Minister Ya’alon be forced to apologize for saying out loud what everyone is thinking.

This is the second time the State Department has taken umbrage at Minister Ya’alon’s candid observations.  Several weeks ago they complained bitterly when Minister Ya’alon  rightly noted that Secretary Kerry was “messianic” and “obsessive” in his desperate efforts to force a peace agreement  between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and that the proposed security arrangements in the Jordan Valley were useless.
It is understandable that, for political reasons, Minister Ya’alon has chosen to issue quasi-apologies to Secretary Kerry in response to the tantrums of the State Department. In reality, however, Minister Ya’alon owes no apology to anyone for publicly telling the painful truth.  If anything, it is the Obama Administration that owes an apology to the American people for shirking its responsibilities as leader of the free world.
Equally pathetic are the lamentations of the Israelis who quiver at the mere thought of offending the delicate sensibilities of President Obama or Secretary Kerry. Assuming a supine posture of obsequiousness, these Israeli politicians and pundits insist that everyone tell the Obama Administration what it wants to hear, no matter how disconnected from reality it is:

“How big and strong you are! We are so grateful to you for demanding we appease our enemies! You clearly know better than we what is in our best interests!”

Minister Ya’alon has had the temerity to tell the unflattering truth about the feckless foreign policy of the United States under the reign of President Obama.  His blunt and insightful statements may not have been politically correct, but it is long past time for someone to have the courage to make them.
Both the Israeli and American publics are entitled to have an honest dialogue about the threats to both countries.

The United States public needs to hear that its government has lost the respect of foes and friends alike throughout the world.

The Israeli people need to understand that they stand alone against the threats from Iran, Syria, Lebanon and the Palestinian Arabs. They must not be deluded into thinking that the United States will be of any assistance.

Minster Ya’alon deserves the gratitude of both Americans and Israelis for telling it like it is, even if it seems like hell.  Harry Truman would have approved.
March 22, 2014 | 10 Comments »

Leave a Reply

10 Comments / 10 Comments

  1. What most people do not understand is that the Messiah does not come to carry out revenge – he comes to assure the singularity of one God, of which the Jewish nation is His main proposer on this Earth

  2. The problem with Iran as many folks before me have noted is that it adheres to a particular eschatology that envisions bringing the Messiah with a cataclysmal event such as a nuclear war. It isn’t that they don’t know that they could be incinerated in response to an initial strike on Israel or elsewhere (say Riyadh); its that they think it is part of a divine plan for the good. What is truly puzzling is why the U.S., Russia, China and the E.U. don’t get it.

  3. Read this great article on Ya’alon:

    Ya’alon is simply setting the record straight

    Op-ed: US should admit that Israel’s defense minister is reading regional map much better than Secretary of State Kerry.

    Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon showed up at a television studio last weekend and declared for the umpteenth time that in our generation there is no chance for a permanent agreement between Israel and the Palestinians. For the umpteenth time, he also noted that in the distant past he had actually believed in the “territories for peace” formula, but that in the meantime he had recovered from his naivety.

    As you know, Ya’alon is not the only minister who has the habit of recycling his beliefs in interviews with the media. Almost all his fellow government members do the same, each with his own beliefs. Even the most skillful politician cannot reinvent himself in every interview. The justice minister always says that Israel must make more concessions for peace, and the defense minister always says that there is no point in making any concessions. Nonetheless, we have developed a strange habit of responding to Livni’s comments with a yawn and breaking into cries of despair after every Ya’alon interview: Oh no, Bogie doesn’t believe in peace.

    Irresponsible Conduct
    US will not forget Ya’alon’s insult / Alon Pinkas
    Op-ed: Defense minister’s comments will greatly influence American willingness to listen to Israel on crucial issues like Iran.
    Full op-ed
    Actually, Ya’alon himself has developed his own strange habit: He is unmoved by the cries of despair. Despite the heavy psychological pressure exerted on him from all directions, he has a consistent tendency to maintain his composure, to the point of complete indifference to surrounding hysteria. His rhetoric is not subject to instructions from public opinion leaders. As the former Military Intelligence head and as a retired IDF chief of staff, he already has a solid opinion about the chances of the agreement between Jerusalem and Ramallah. It is his duty to reveal it to the public even if a certain camp doesn’t like it. He is the defense minister, not the political correctness minister.

    Who is right and who is obsessive?
    While doing that, Ya’alon managed to irritate the Americans too, not just the peace seekers here, but there is no need to exaggerate in describing the extent of this irritation. Our defense establishment leader simply set the record straight when he said last week that the United States was showing global weakness and that its allies in the Middle East were disappointed with it. Every child in Damascus, Kiev or Manhattan knows that Obama’s US is pursuing a spineless global policy. The opinion pages in the American press are filled with similar indictments against the Obama administration. According to all signs, even the administration itself knows it, but it’s convenient to pull an insulted face when the Israeli defense minister joins the criticism.

    Washington is now accusing Ya’alon of intentionally undermining the relationship between the two countries, no less. It is forgetting its own contribution to undermining the relations. Obama is the least pleasant American president towards Israel in the past 50 years, both in his words and in his actions. In his five years in the White House, the president insulted the prime minister more than two or three times, while the prime minister actually made sure not to throw insults back at him. Ya’alon is less strict, but is still quite polite. Despite the asymmetry between the sides, the American president should reflect on his own actions instead of imposing sanctions on our defense minister.

    After all, America doesn’t have many friendly alternatives in the Middle East. It should even admit to itself that Ya’alon is reading the regional map much better than John Kerry. Last summer, when Kerry promised us peace within nine months, Ya’alon already voiced contradictory promises. Is there still any doubt in Washington who will be right in the end and who will be revealed as obsessive?

  4. dweller Said:

    You stopped reading too soon. Mladen Andrijasevic did not cite the Shavit remark because he ‘agreed’ with it.

    I was criticizing Shavit’s opinion (may be I should have stated it differently). You are right in saying “Mladen Andrijasevic did not cite the Shavit remark because he ‘agreed’ with it.”
    Thanks for your comment.

  5. @ AbbaGuutuu:

    “Ari Shavit: But the Iranians are rational, and the use of nuclear weapons is an irrational act. Like the Soviets, they will never do that.”

    “The above mentioned statement is totally wrong. The Mutually Assured Destruction Deterrent (MADD) cold war nuclear policy served well between the former USSR and US and the West because they have similar values when it comes to human lives (they want to live)unlike Iran… Iranian leadership is not rational and believes that the use of nuclear weapons is rational, too. It is naive to believe otherwise.”

    You stopped reading too soon. Mladen Andrijasevic did not cite the Shavit remark because he ‘agreed’ with it.

    He followed it with a quote from Ya’alon, containing this:

    “…The ambition of the present regime in Tehran is for the Western world to become Muslim at the end of a lengthy process. Accordingly, we have to understand that their rationality is completely different from our rationality. Their concepts are different and their considerations are different. They are completely unlike the former Soviet Union. They are not even like Pakistan or North Korea. If Iran enjoys a nuclear umbrella and the feeling of strength of a nuclear power, there is no knowing how it will behave. It will be impossible to accommodate a nuclear Iran and it will be impossible to attain stability…”

  6. @ Mladen Andrijasevic:

    “I can only conclude that the American press is just incapable of handling the truth about the Iranian threat and chooses to ignore it.”

    Actually, the American press is incapable of handling the truth about OBAMA.

    I suspect that if he weren’t their man, they might be a trifle more sober in their assessment of the Mullahs & what to do about them.

    As it is, they’re just too addicted to the Kool-aid to see clearly.

  7. Mladen Andrijasevic Said:

    Ari Shavit: But the Iranians are rational, and the use of nuclear weapons is an irrational act. Like the Soviets, they will never do that.

    The above mentioned statement is totally wrong. The Mutually Assured Destruction Deterrent (MADD) cold war nuclear policy served well between the former USSR and US and the West because they have similar values when it comes to human lives (they want to live)unlike Iran. Iran believes that it gets rewards from Allah if they die fighting infidels by creating chaos through out the world in order to form a world wide caliphate to bring back their messiah (Mahdi). Iranian leadership is not rational and believes that the use of nuclear weapons is rational, too. It is naive to believe otherwise.

  8. One thing for sure – when Bibi is no longer PM and Yaalon is a candidate , he has my vote. He says it as it is – and bugger the Americans. Its time someone spoke up. Another thought – a SOFT Lieberman will not be a good PM!

  9. Since when does Ya’alon have to apologize for saying that 2 + 2 = 4?
    http://www.madisdead.blogspot.co.il/2014/03/since-when-does-yaalon-have-to.html

    Two years ago I wrote:

    I can only conclude that the American press is just incapable of handling the truth about the Iranian threat and chooses to ignore it. The frankness displayed by the Ya’alon interview in Ha’aretz is just too much for the uninformed and sleepwalking US public to handle.

    Now we see that the Obama administration is even less capable of handling the truth. Both the Obama administration and the American press live in a fantasy world they take for reality.

    Who’s Afraid of Moshe Ya’alon?

    Ari Shavit: But the Iranians are rational, and the use of nuclear weapons is an irrational act. Like the Soviets, they will never do that.

    Moshe Ya’alon: “A Western individual observing the fantastic ambitions of the Iranian leadership scoffs: ‘What do they think, that they will Islamize us?’ The surprising answer is: Yes, they think they will Islamize us: The ambition of the present regime in Tehran is for the Western world to become Muslim at the end of a lengthy process. Accordingly, we have to understand that their rationality is completely different from our rationality. Their concepts are different and their considerations are different. They are completely unlike the former Soviet Union. They are not even like Pakistan or North Korea. If Iran enjoys a nuclear umbrella and the feeling of strength of a nuclear power, there is no knowing how it will behave. It will be impossible to accommodate a nuclear Iran and it will be impossible to attain stability. The consequences of a nuclear Iran will be catastrophic.”