Contact: media1@unwatch.orgTel: +41 22 734 1472
GENEVA, October 27, 2013 – UN Watch today issued the following statement on Israel’s decision to return to the UN Human Rights Council — a 47-nation body that in two weeks will welcome back China, Cuba, Russia and Saudi Arabia as members — in time for a scheduled review of the Jewish state’s record this Tuesday.
ISRAEL-ONLY AGENDA
“Now is the time for the council to show good faith on its part — starting with the removal of its notorious agenda item on Israel, the only provision of its kind focusing on a specific country at every meeting,” said Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, a Geneva-based human rights group that monitors the UN by the yardstick of its charter.
“Not even gross abusers like China, Sudan, or Syria, nor any other country in the world, is subjected to this kind of treatment,” said Neuer.
The Israel-only agenda was criticized by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon upon its adoption in June 2007. Mr. Ban “voiced disappointment at the Council decision to single out Israel as the only specific regional item on its agenda, given the range and scope of allegations of human rights violations throughout the world.”
MORE RESOLUTIONS ON ISRAEL THAN REST OF WORLD COMBINED
Under that item, in its last session in March, the council adopted six resolutions condemning Israel — and only four on the rest of the world combined (one each on Syria, Iran, Myanmar and Sri Lanka).
“The plight of the vast majority of the world’s victims of gross and systematic violations—from China to Saudi Arabia, Cuba to Zimbabwe—failed to merit a single resolution,” said Neuer.
ONLY COUNTRY EXCLUDED FROM REGIONAL GROUPS
Israel is the only UN member state excluded from the regional group system at the council. Neuer called on the UN to end this “violation of basic equality and due process,” saying “EU states should immediately enable Israel to join the council’s Western group, to which it was admitted at the UN in New York over a decade ago.”
“Moreover, the council’s permanent investigator on Israeli violations is mandated by the council to examine only Israel and not Hamas, Fatah, Islamic Jihad, or any other Palestinian actor. It’s the only country mandate that examines the actions of only one side, and presumes them to be violations,” added Neuer.
“The one they chose for the job, Richard Falk — who reports to the GA in New York on Tuesday, on the same day as Israel is scrutinized by the HRC in Geneva — endorses Hamas, praises 9/11 conspiracy theorists, and was just condemned two weeks ago by UN chief Ban Ki-moon, the US, the UK, and Canada for implying the Boston attacks were somehow the fault of the U.S. and Israel.”
“The United Nations must stop violating its own charter guarantee to respect the equal rights of nations large and small, and the Human Rights Council must respect its own principles of universality, impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity,” said Neuer.
###
Quotes and Key Facts on UNHRC Treatment of Israel
Regional Group Exclusion
. UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 25 March 1998, said that “Israel [is] the only Member State that is not a member of one of the regional groups…This anomaly should be corrected. We must uphold the principle of equality among all United Nations Member States.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 12 December 1999 remarked that “the exclusion of Israel from the system of regional groupings [and] the intense focus given to some of Israel’s actions, while other situations sometimes fail to elicit the similar outrage […] have given a regrettable impression of bias and one-sidedness.”
• Kofi Annan, in regard to Israel’s exclusion from a regional group, said that “we must uphold the principle of equality among Member States. I shall keep encouraging all concerned to find a solution.”
• Late UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Sergio de Mello actively lobbied Ambassadors in Geneva for the inclusion of Israel into the Western group.
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 15 March 2005 spoke of the “need to correct a long-standing anomaly that kep tIsrael from participating fully and equally in the work of the Organization” by including Israel as member of the Western European and Others Group in Geneva.
• Sir Robert Jennings, QC, former President of the International Court of Justice, wrote that “Israel’s exclusion from the regional group system places the UN in breach of its fundamental obligations regarding sovereign equality and is thus illegal… The need now to redress it is urgent.”
Biased Agenda Item and Resolutions
• UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on 20 June 2007 criticized “the Council decision to single out Israel as the only specific regional item on its agenda, given the range and scope of allegations of human rights violations throughout the world.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan on 25 March 1998 said that “I know that Israelis see hypocrisy and double standards in the intense scrutiny given to some of its actions, while other situations fail to elicit the world’s outrage and condemnations.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, in his message to the Human Rights Council on 29 November 2006, expressed the hope that the Council would deal with the Middle East issue “in an impartial way” and “not allow it to monopolize attention at the expense of others where there are equally grave or even graver violations.”
• UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, addressing the Security Council on 12 December 2006, remarked “I believe the actions of some UN bodies may themselves be counterproductive. The Human Rights Council, for example, has already held three special sessions focused on the Arab-Israeli conflict. I hope the Council will take care to handle the issue in an impartial way, and not allow it to monopolize attention at the expense of other situations where there are no less grave violations, or even worse.”www.unwatch.org
UN Watch is a Geneva-based human rights organization founded in 1993 to monitor UN compliance with the principles of its Charter. It is accredited as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) in Special Consultative Status to the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and as an Associate NGO to the UN Department of Public Information (DPI).
Laura Said:
@ yamit82:
I wouldn’t go that far.
Eric R. Said:
NO!!!!
yamit82 Said:
That’s harsh!
We have warned for years about the criminal mind in Netanyahu’s make up. He was not any different at any time. Slime, deceitful, vicious, underhanded, cowardly, lying, sabotaging traitor. Not by chance he choose to ally with Barak, Peres, Livni and Lapid.
NOTE: Since his father died all stops that kept him at least to some extent under some control are gone and we have started to see how much of a deadly enemy he is.
The solution is in the hands of the people and superior forces. The system as a whole must be dismantled and many of those in there sternly directed to face the most rigid freely elected courts.
@ yamit82:
Between this and the prisoner exchange, is there any chance to force a no-confidence vote that could bring down Netanyahu?
yamit82 Said:
When Jews screw up, they do far more damage to themselves than anti-Semites could ever inflict upon them. A beautiful people does not need to bring down shame upon itself. That is Israel’s cross to bear.
The world wants the Jews to be an active participant in our own national suicide and with BB they are succeeding.
A DAY DOES NOT PASS THAT BB DOES NOT DO SOMETHING TO DIMINISH AND SHAME US AS A NATION. HE IS TO ISRAEL WHAT OBAMA IS TO AMERICA.
BUT:
Seriously, did anyone expect BB do do otherwise? Boycotting the UNHRC was never BB’s choice or decision in the first place it was all Lieberman’s. The verdict in Lieberman’s trial will be handed down within a weeks or so and if he is acquitted, look for him to bolt the Likud forcing a coalition crisis.
The Fat lady has not yet begun to sing.
Dream on.
Dhimmi Netanyahu caved into American and European pressure to return to the UNHRC.
Anyone who thinks Israel will be treated differently from now on than in the past is in for a rude awakening.
Jews are not going be welcomed as equals into the human family no matter what Netanyahu thinks. That is the bottom line.