Leave a Reply

12 Comments / 12 Comments

  1. @ CuriousAmerican:

    The Palestinians suffer losses of 10 to 1.

    Just listen to your CHOICE of words, american.
    “Suffer”…..
    SUFFER???
    Whiskey Tango Foxtrot!!!!
    When mothers (MOTHERS, american, MOTHERS, got that?) are BRAGGING that one of their little bastards was killed (oh, you know, kkkkoran 9:111) they are overwhelmed with joy….
    So no. They do not “suffer” they are ELATED.

    there are some 1.6 billion musloids desecrating this beautiful blue planet.
    There are +/- 13.5 million Jews.
    And here you are suggesting that “Israel is actually hitting back”?
    You call this 10:1 hitting back????

    When the response is 10 CITIES (!!!), that is when you could say that Israel is (justly) retaliating.

    I am not anti-Israel. 80% of Americans are pro-Israel.

    You mean, “why, some of my best friends are Jewish…”
    🙂

  2. @ the phoenix:
    No! The antisemitic world KNOW that they can hit and provoke and hit again with impunity and nothing would really happen….

    Since when does Israel NOT retaliate. This myth of being attacked with impunity is just that: A myth.

    The Palestinians suffer losses of 10 to 1.

    Maybe that it is just; but it certainly indicates that Israel hits back. Stop with the impunity myth.

    @ the phoenix:
    So yes, american, maybe you and your ilk SHOULD be bothered.

    My ilk? What is my ilk?!

    I am not anti-Israel. 80% of Americans are pro-Israel.

    Stop with your paranoia.

  4. @ CuriousAmerican:

    An Israel with nukes does NOT bother me like the thought of Iran with nukes.

    @ yamit82:

    Maybe it should bother you.

    This is the key to situation as it is now.
    The american, like the rest of the anti-Semite world, sleep very soundly with no concern that the Jewish state is armed with nuclear bombs. And indeed why shouldn’t they?
    The Jewish state has shown an almost pathological desire to achieve “peace” in spite of the obvious facts that it just ain’t gonna happen!
    As comedian Jackie mason used to say “did you ever hear somebody warning someone, not to go into that Jewish neighborhood as he might get mugged by an accountant?”
    No! The antisemitic world KNOW that they can hit and provoke and hit again with impunity and nothing would really happen…. Sort of like the blond son of a bitch that got (unfortunately, ONLY) lt. Col. Eisner’s rifle but in his face…
    Incredible. The vile antisemitic creature started to bleed and then cry “look what the Jew did to me”….. And of course, the antisemitic media with their super duper cameras at ready, captured that moment….

    But the real answer is yamit’s.
    It is high time the world SHOULD start worrying….
    Maybe a few test drive dress dens, just to get the point across would not be a bad idea.
    All the rhetoric coming from the guy with the red marker could be used to inflate a whole bunch of balloons at some kid’s birthday party and that’s just about it.
    May a true Jewish leader rise,and soon….

    So yes, american, maybe you and your ilk SHOULD be bothered.

  6. @ yamit82:
    You are hoping it will happen though. Disappointment shows through your facade.

    Stop telling me what I think. You are arrogant.

    Actually, I do not give it much thought, either way.

    All you need to know is that I approve of a strike on Iran.

    An Israel with nukes does NOT bother me like the thought of Iran with nukes.

  7. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and United Nations’ Resolutions

    Israel was originally expected to sign the 1968 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and on June 12, 1968, Israel voted in favor of the treaty in the UN General Assembly. But when the invasion of Czechoslovakia in August by the Soviet Union delayed ratification around the world, Israel’s internal division and hesitation over the treaty became public. The Johnson administration attempted to use the sale of 50 F-4 Phantoms to pressure Israel to sign the treaty that fall, culminating in a personal letter from Lyndon Johnson to Israeli PM Levi Eshkol. But by November Johnson had backed away from tying the F-4 sale with the NPT after a stalemate in negotiations, and Israel would neither sign nor ratify the treaty. After the series of negotiations, U.S. assistant secretary of defense for international security Paul Warnke was convinced that Israel already possessed nuclear weapons. In 2007 Israel sought an exemption to non-proliferation rules in order to import atomic material legally.

    In 1996, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution calling for the establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region of the Middle East. Arab nations and annual conferences of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) repeatedly have called for application of IAEA safeguards and the creation of a nuclear-free Middle East. Arab nations have accused the United States of practicing a double standard in criticizing Iran’s nuclear program while ignoring Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons. According to a statement by the Arab League, Arab states will withdraw from the NPT if Israel acknowledges having nuclear weapons but refuses to open its facilities to international inspection and destroy its arsenal.

    In a statement to the May 2009 preparatory meeting for the 2010 NPT Review Conference, the US delegation reiterated the longstanding US support for “universal adherence to the NPT”, but uncharacteristically named Israel among the four countries that have not done so. An unnamed Israeli official dismissed the suggestion that it would join the NPT and questioned the effectiveness of the treaty. The Washington Times reported that this statement threatened to derail the 40-year-old secret agreement between the U.S. and Israel to shield Israel’s nuclear weapons program from international scrutiny,while Avner Cohen, author of Israel and the Bomb, argued that acknowledging its nuclear program would allow Israel to take part constructively in efforts to control nuclear weapons.

    The Final Document of the 2010 NPT Review Conference calls for a conference in 2012 to implement a resolution of the 1995 NPT Review Conference that calls for the establishment of a Middle East Zone free of weapons of mass destruction. The United States joined the international consensus for Final Document, but criticized the section on the Middle East resolution for singling out Israel as the only state in the region that is not party to the NPT, while at the same time ignoring Iran’s “longstanding violation of the NPT and UN Security Council Resolutions.”

  8. CuriousAmerican Said:

    Note to Yamit: I am not saying Israel should

    You are hoping it will happen though. Disappointment shows through your facade.

    Obama’s Real Agenda: Israel’s Dimona Nuclear Facility
    By Moshe Dann

    “I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America’s commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. That commitment is at the core of the Treaty, and it must be kept for all who fully abide by it. And I am hopeful that all countries in the region can share in this goal.”
    Pres. Barack Hussein Obama, June 4, 2009

    Unlike any other President, Obama has put Israel in a difficult, if not impossible position. If it refuses to agree to sign the NPT, Israel will be isolated and blamed for lack of progress on Iran. If it agrees, Israel will lose a vital strategic deterrent.

    Obama’s speech is an ominous warning of what he is prepared to do in order to strip Israel of its military advantage. Along with the loss of control over Judea and Samaria, territories that are vital for Israel’s security and access to water reserves, faced with Arab terrorist militias backed by Arab armies, Israel will be completely vulnerable.

  9. It speaks to the idiocy of Islam that the Arabs and Iranians do not make more of an issue of Israel’s nukes.

    I stand amazed that the Iranians do NOT offer to surrender their nuclear program on condition that Israel surrender its nukes.

    Note to Yamit: I am not saying Israel should

    What amazes me is how poorly the Muslims play the public relations game.

    They have no concept of democracy and how to sway a hostile crowd.

    The problem is not that the Arabs bring the issue up.

    The amazing thing is that they do not make a bigger issue of Israel’s nukes; and that they do not do so regularly.

    It shows their lack of wisdom.

    Actually, this news is hopeful for Israel. It shows their enemies are idiots.

  11. The Jews are always every one’s whipping boy!

    A peace deal with the Arabs (if it ever happens) won’t change world hostility towards Israel.

    Anti-Semitism is as immutable a fact of life on this world as the rising and setting of the sun.

  12. The hyenas are getting organized and preparing for a kill.
    There must be a SWIFT and non ambiguous message coming from Jerusalem:

    “Yes we do have nukes.
    No. They are not to be ‘handed over’
    Our nukes are aimed and READY to be dropped on each and every capital city of the ‘enlightened’ world (spit!) that is seeking our destruction in an…oh elegant way. Ad of course upon the capitals of each and every Muslim country….
    DO NOT MESS WITH ISRAEL!”

    This, is practically the entire world…
    This message is not to be delivered in diplomatic language but in a straight forward easy to understand grade 6 english.
    This is ONE fire that must be put out quick!!!
    Current ‘leadership’ has zero credibility.
    Going to the UN with a red marker would be a very bad joke, it would actually be an insult to the intelligence.

    A change of leadership must take place, and FAST, and after that, the new “extreme right” leader should be delivering the above message.