Benghazi Blues

By Michael Walsh, PJ MEDIA

Shame of a Nation

No matter what happens with Darrell Issa’s congressional committee meetings this week, we are witnessing thebeginning of the end of the Obama administration, and the cause is Benghazi. It’s impossible to overestimate the blowback that has been gathering steam for the past seven months, now about to erupt with full force. Few reputations will emerge unscathed, Obama’s presidency will be crippled, Hillary Clinton‘s 2016  candidacy will be destroyed — and perhaps some new heroes will be born.

My New York Post column on Friday, which was also linked at RealClearPolitics, sets the stage:

On Wednesday, the FBI released photos of three men present at the deadly jihadist attack on the US consulate in Benghazi, Libya; the bureau has asked the Libyans’ help in identifying them.

Which nicely highlights the fact that it’s been more than seven months since Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other brave Americans were killed — and yet there’s been no justice, nor even vengeance, in the matter.

Nor much exposure: We know little more today than we did in the immediate aftermath of the fiasco.

That’s because, right from the jump, the administration has been lying through its teeth about what happened on the night of Sept. 11, 2012 — the eleventh anniversary of 9/11, as it happens. It transparently lied about the Mohammad video, threw the scapegoated filmmaker in jail (where, last time I looked, he still is), and  convened a bogus “accountability” board to whitewash the whole damn thing so as not to disrupt the precious Narrative that Osama was dead and al-Qaeda was on the run.

It was all a lie, of course, and some of us knew it at the time. I wrote about it repeatedly on the Post’s Op-Ed page: you can find examples herehere and here. In this case, however, what happened in Benghazi, Foggy Bottom, the White House, and the Obama re-election campaign headquarters in Chicago was (as the saying going) worse than a crime: it was a blunder. And that blunder may now bring down the man who never should have been president in the first place, for grotesque dereliction of his duty as commander-in-chief:

Indeed, the State Department’s Inspector General is now investigating the Accountability Review Board that reported on Benghazi in December, Fox News reported yesterday. What Fox called “well-placed sources” say the IG is trying to find out if the State panel failed to interview key witnesses who’d come forward.

In fact, Washington power attorney Victoria Toensing — a Reagan-era deputy assistant attorney general with a strong background in intelligence work — says she’s got a whistle blower inside State who’s itching to go public.

But so far she’s been stymied by officials who won’t act on her request for a security clearance so she can deal with classified material the case entails. Other attorneys for as many as three other potential witnesses from inside State and CIA say they’re having the same problem.

In fact, some whistleblowers allege that they’ve been threatened with reprisals should they come forward — even though federal law explicitly protects whistleblowers.

At his Monday press conference, President Obama shrugged off questions about all this, saying, “I’m not familiar with this notion that anybody has been blocked from testifying.”

There’s another lie — this one of Nixonian quality.  From the moment Obama learned of the attack on the Benghazi compound — learned in part from Ambassador Stevens’ frantic phone calls to Washington, begging for help — what did he do? He went to bed early and flew off to Las Vegas in the morning for a campaign appearance; after all, first things first. And since Barry’s only real function in this administration is as its frontman/pitchman, he was only doing what he does best.

He’ll be aware soon enough. Next week, the House Oversight Committee, chaired by Rep. Darrell Issa (R.-Calif.), will open new hearings on Benghazi — and they could be explosive. He promises to expose new information the administration “has tried to suppress.”

Issa — who previously held the administration’s feet to fire over the still-unresolved Fast and Furious gunrunning scandal — has twice requested guidelines from State, but a department spokesman recently denied that any whistleblowers have come forward and scoffed at reports that they’ve been intimidated.

In fact, word is that some of the whistleblowers may testify that help in the form of a rapid-response force was only hours away — but, for whatever reason, was not authorized.

Hillary, about to find out what difference it makes.

This is going to be a significant test for Issa, who spearheaded the Fast and Furious investigation but wound up frustrated and impotent, unable to get the truth out of Eric Holder et al., although he did managed to get the attorney general cited for contempt of Congress. The Southern California congressman had better bring his A game and his best fastball as he goes up against seasoned prevaricators like Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state whom the late Bill Safire once memorably called — in the pages of the New York Times, no less — a “congenital liar.” In fact, what Safire, writing about Whitewater and other Clinton scandals, said back in 1996 is worth revisiting:

Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization that our First Lady — a woman of undoubted talents who was a role model for many in her generation — is a congenital liar.

Drip by drip, like Whitewater torture, the case is being made that she is compelled to mislead, and to ensnare her subordinates and friends in a web of deceit…

Therefore, ask not “Why didn’t she just come clean at the beginning?” She had good reasons to lie; she is in the longtime habit of lying; and she has never been called to account for lying herself or in suborning lying in her aides and friends.

The leopard hasn’t changed her spots, and it will be interesting to watch the Bill-Hill dynamic play out once again, this time with her as the object of the prosecutor’s and public’s wrath. Nor has there ever been any love lost between Hillary and Obama; she felt cheated out of the nomination by an upstart nobody with a negligible record of accomplishment in any field, but swallowed her pride and took one for Team Clinton in order to maintain her viability to succeed Obama. If he decides to throw her to the wolves over Benghazi, there will be hell to pay.

And hell is what is coming, one way or the other, because this time — unlike the Clinton impeachment — the big dogs are in play, in the form of hordes of very pissed-off special ops agents, patriotic spooks, forcibly retired generals and clandestine operatives who know where the bodies are buried. If the Obama administration turned its back on Chris Stevens and the three other brave Americans who died that day for crass political purposes — and, worse, if it let them die as collateral damage in its own gunrunning operation to Syria — the men and women who stand watch for this country all through the night are going to come out of the shadows, quickly.

May 6, 2013 | 8 Comments »

Leave a Reply

8 Comments / 8 Comments

  1. Hicks also rejected the defence given by Hillary Clinton when pressed on the initial delay in attributing the attack to terrorists, arguing the US undermined its Libyan allies who were rightly pointing to Ansar al-Sharia.

    “President Magarief was insulted in front of his own people, in front of the world. His credibility was reduced. His ability to govern was [damaged]. He was angry

    From Pam Geller – for those that paint all Libyans (and all Muslims – men women and children) with the same ‘terrorist’ label.

    And you can’t have it both ways label them all as Al Qaeda and use this as an argument to attack the administration.

  2. lol this is the war between Republicans and Democrats — lots of hysteria.
    One dimensional politics – tiresome hysteria. yamit82 Said:

    UN says Syrian rebels may have been behind chem weapons attack, former Bush official says it’s Israel

    Is this the Sci-fi channel? Come on people – get a grip.

  3. UN says Syrian rebels may have been behind chem weapons attack, former Bush official says it’s Israel

    Colin Powell’s former chief of staff, Lawrence Wilkerson, blames the Joooz, claiming that Israel used chemical weapons as a false flag operation to implicate the Assad regime.

    “We don’t know what the chain of custody is. This could’ve been an Israeli false flag operation, it could’ve been an opposition in Syria… or it could’ve been an actual use by Bashar Assad.

    But we certainly don’t know with the evidence we’ve been given. And what I’m hearing from the intelligence community is that that evidence is really flakey,” retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s former chief of staff, told Cenk Uygur in an interview with Current TV.

    Given this “flimsy evidence,” Wilkerson doesn’t believe a red line has been crossed in Syria, and that the US should not base its intervention in the war-torn country based on such evidence.

    Wilkerson criticized Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu harshly, saying there is a “geostratigically, geopolitical inept regime in Tel Aviv right now.”

  4. @ Bernard Ross:

    Germany, The Master of Europe

    “Angela Merkel has made Germany master of Europe in a way Hitler and Kaiser Wilhelm only dreamt of. The implications are frightening.”

    “For in just a few years, using the European Union as her vehicle, she has succeeded where Bismarck, Kaiser Wilhelm II and Hitler failed – turning an entire continent into a greater German empire.
    Melodramatic? Perhaps.

    But this is the implication of a devastating new book by the eminent sociologist Ulrich Beck, who teaches at the University of Munich and the London School of Economics.
    According to Professor Beck, one of the most respected scholars of his generation, Germany is now the undisputed master of Europe. And at its head is Angela Merkel, a former chemist from East Germany and a political mastermind of extraordinary cunning, subtlety and ambition.
    No politician of her generation, Beck argues, better incarnates the cynical values described by the Italian thinker Niccolo Machiavelli, whose treatise The Prince was a primer in how to win and wield power. Read More and comment

  5. yamit82 Said:

    I also think the Republicans will protect Obama. When the truth comes out about Obama they will have been seen to be complicit in the coverup.

    I’ll bet that all the players, repubs included, are so corrupt that none of them can really let the cats out of the bag. They probably have agreed red lines between the parties so as not to trigger a blood bath of revelation.

  6. Knowing the Clintons they have enough on Obama to have him by his short hairs. They throw H Rotten Clinton to the dogs she takes Obama down with her.

    I believe she will be a protected species at all costs. She could settle for a Supreme Court appointment.

    I also think the Republicans will protect Obama. When the truth comes out about Obama they will have been seen to be complicit in the coverup.

    That’s why till now when they had the chance to nail the administration in the election debates and during the committee questioning they laid off Rotten and others from sticking it to them.

    The best that might be hoped is they tie Obama and company down long enough to get by mid term elections and hope they can steal the Senate.

  7. Hillary Clinton‘s 2016 candidacy will be destroyed —

    It was my belief from the biginning that her appointment was designed to be a “basket to carry water”. As head of DOS one has to follow instructions while at the same time taking responsibility. Colin Powell was given the same position when he was considered a presidential contender. it is an appointment which tends to lower the appointees image but the appointee always believes he can pull off a coup which will make him/her the next president 🙂 It may even be that those who place obama at the head of the dem party do not wish to see Hillary as Pres in 2016. That faction was hostile to the Bill C. presidency. It was a factional war and those same players don’t want a return of the clinton admin. It may all have been a set up to knock her out of the race. If it all comes to light she will be the fall guy, not to say she doesn’t deserve it, but she may have been a sucker. Has she been played? Who should have reacted and given instruction to send in the rapid response unit? who prevented what should be an almost automatic response.
    Times like these usually require a major distraction like the Iran war.