Like the sequester molesters, “Arab Spring” devotees have their own fantasy vocabulary.
-
The Arab Spring, instead, is the tyranny of Islamic supremacism cruelly masqueraded as the forward march of “freedom.”
‘Sequester” may be your word for the week, but it’s not mine. I’ve been diverted from the Beltway theater by an enterprise equally fraudulent, the “Arab Spring.” No, the plot line does not feature an Armageddon of budget slashing after which, somehow, Leviathan manages to land on his drunken feet and binge up an even higher tab this year than last. The Arab Spring, instead, is the tyranny of Islamic supremacism cruelly masqueraded as the forward march of “freedom.”
On Tuesday, the dead-tree version of Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, my book on the subject, finally hit the bookstores after previously being available only as an e-book. Despite the digital age, people still love their paperbacks, so I’ve had the good fortune to spend this week talking about it.
[..]
Like the sequester molesters, “Arab Spring” devotees have their own fantasy vocabulary. The whoppers are “freedom” and “democracy,” the ideals, we’re told, that have swept the Middle East, even as it sinks into repression, social unrest, and the persecution of religious minorities. Islam and the West use the same words, but we are not conveying the same concepts — just as a “cut” in your budget means something very different from a “cut” in Washington’s.
Freedom? “Let it be known to you that the real meaning of freedom lies in the perfection of slavery,” explained al-Qushayri, a celebrated eleventh-century scholar of Islam.
I offer this bit of Islamist wisdom as an explanation, not a put-down. Not that the distinction matters much. As Spring Fever makes clear, the culture of Middle Eastern Islam is convinced of nothing so much as its own superiority. It does not judge itself by non-Islamic standards, particularly the standards of Western civilization, with which it sees itself in a conflict that will end only when one side prevails.
The dynamic, classical, supremacist Islam of the Middle East teaches that Allah has given mankind, His creation, the gift of sharia: the “path,” the all-purpose societal framework — covering all aspects of life, not just spirituality — for living in dignity through obedience. “Freedom,” in this context, is to make the “free” choice to surrender oneself entirely to this path.
That is the antithesis of a freedom to chart one’s own course, the freedom of the West. Here, Allah is not the sovereign. Our faiths may guide us, but the people are sovereign, with a right to govern civil society as they see fit — including in contradiction of sharia’s provisions, which deny what the West sees as basic civil rights.
Thus the folly of Arab Spring apologists, who envision a new generation of Muslim rulers, popularly elected and thus — the fable goes — responsive to the needs of their “constituents.” Responsive government, however, is the hallmark of societies in which freedom means self-determinism. In the Muslim Middle East, it is foolish to speak of “constituents.” The ruler’s fidelity is not to the people but to Allah. It is for the people not to dream but to obey, as long as the ruler is faithful to sharia. They don’t enjoy the prerogative of deviating from the path.
“Accommodation,” like “constituents,” is a term that echoes through the Arab Spring. Sharia must be accommodated — given pride of place in the Middle East and growing deference in the West. “Accommodation” turns out to be Arab-Spring for “balanced approach,” the oh-so-reasonable packaging of an idea that is actually perverse.
Almost never do we hear that federal law must accommodate, say, the law of Tennessee. When people’s principles are the same, their legal systems — a reflection of their notions about right and wrong — will mesh easily. When there is a conflict, it is not because of a lack of accommodation; it is because either the federal government or the state government is in error. We don’t accommodate error; we correct it, either in the legislature or in the courts.
Calling for “accommodations” is a polite way of saying that cultural values and the legal systems they create are incompatible. When a culture cedes ground to a different culture’s antithetical principle — when, for example, we are told free speech must “accommodate” sharia blasphemy laws that proscribe negative criticism of Islam — that is not a reasonable compromise. It is a corruption of the good. That is how a culturally confident society sees it.
There is a reason why the Islamic supremacists who run the Organization of Islamic Cooperation insisted in 1990 on having their own “Declaration of Human Rights In Islam.” The purportedly Universal Declaration of Human Rights, written by non-Muslim diplomats after the Second World War, does not work for them. Islamist leaders understood that Western concepts of civil rights and human rights do not jibe with sharia. They wanted their own declaration, reflecting their own very different aspirations.
Neither does “democracy” work for the Islamists on the rise across the Middle East — at least, not as we understand it in the West. For us, democracy is not a process but a way of life, a worldview implying basic assumptions about liberty and equality. To the Islamic supremacist, “Democracy is just the train we board to reach our destination,” as Recep Tayyip Erdogan, now Turkey’s prime minister, put it in 1998 when he was the mayor — or, as he referred to himself, the imam — of Istanbul.
The destination Erdogan had in mind is power. Not the empowerment of free people that is the genuine augur of spring. The power of the “Arab Spring” is the imposition of perfect slavery.
— Andrew C. McCarthy is a senior fellow at the National Review Institute and the executive director of the Philadelphia Freedom Center. He is the author, most recently, of Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, which is published by Encounter Books.
Andy McCarthy is a shabbas goy, a breed known for turning on Jews when the chips are down. And, when he was a NY prosecutor he was strangely lenient on kidnappers sex slave ringleaders. I wouldn’t put too much stock in what this Irish drunk has to say about anything.
Graduate students endorse BDS on a campus at University of Toronto. A BDS campaign against universities like U of T ought to be the response.
For some background on McMaster’s connection to the Muslim Brotherhood see this link and this link. The former Chair of the Mechanical Engineering Department at McMaster, now the President of York University, was employed by McMaster at the time – before he made the leap to the York campus (where Islamist bullying is rife). And look at the background of the University of Toronto’s President – a campus where IAW got its start.
In Canadian universities there is a new perversion that is accompanying Israeli Apartheid Week, adding another week of Islamic indoctrination, hate speech and lies to the existing venue – extending it to two weeks of Islamic bliss.
It is called Islam Awareness Week and it promotes sharia and jihad as very palatable forces of good and self-improvement. See the history here: link. So now the young messengers for the cult of Islam are proselytizing on campus prior to displaying their usual week of Jew/Israel-hate propaganda.
This is clearly a method to recruit new supporters for indoctrination to Jew/Israel hate and hate for our conservative government in Canada which does not buy into Islamist newspeak crap that whitewashes Islam; a religion whose foundations and actions are clearly rooted in violence and conquest and have nothing to do with peace, self-fulfillment, a spiritual quest or any of the other canards they strive to recast their exclusionary and repressive belief system.
If only they just told the truth when they hold their fantastic dialogues with United Churchmen, politicians, union members and leftists, I would respect them, but they must lie to attract the leftist delusionals roaming the country like zombies in great numbers these days. Zombies who are looking for any excuse to hate the Jew – even if that means sacrificing ones own freedoms and beliefs for the sake of undermining Israel.
Off this thread, but on topic for this website:
How Euro-Socialism set off a Fascist Bomb:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/03/how_euro-socialism_set_off_a_fascist_bomb.html