Editorial of The New York Sun
As Governor Romney moves closer to choosing a running mate, the Daily Beast is out with a headline warning against what it calls a “dull white guy.” It runs out the story under the headline “Worse Than Palin?” It prompts us to reprise just why it was that we reckoned that the governor of Alaska was, as we put it at the time, “a perfect pick” for vice president and why we have stood by that opinion through all the ensuing contretemps. We understand completely that she is not seeking to run in the current contest. But the theme that she introduced into American politics, well, let us just say that more than any other candidate in the past decade she has dug down to what we like to call American bedrock, and that is the ground on which to run.
By American bedrock we mean the deep constitutional principles that undergird our republic. The written constitution. Enumerated powers. Reserved powers. God-given rights. More than any other politician of her generation, Mrs. Palin has stood for what she over and over again has called “constitutional conservatism.” It’s not “neo-“ conservatism exactly. That magnificent strain to our politics was opened up by former leftists who saw that the ideals to which the left once gave lip service were better vouchsafed by classical liberalism. It’s not “paleo” conservativism of what was sometimes called the country-club or old-right. What Mrs. Palin has been talking about is a fealty to original principles, on taxation, monetary affairs, war, and spending.
More to the point, in the past four years, she has taken these conservative constitutional principles to the hustings with astounding effect and shaken up not only the national debate but the Republican Party itself. All over this country, she has swung behind candidates hewing to these principles and given them a leg up onto the November ballot. We speak of Ted Cruz at Texas, Richard Mourdock at Indiana, Deb Fischer at Nebraska, and — in the last election — Nikki Haley of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire. Mr. Cruz is a kind of archetype of the Palin pick, superbly educated in politics and law, fluent in the Founders and what they stood for, keenly sensitive that when the Founders gave us a written constitution it was so that we would pay attention to its plain language.
So when the left carps about the prospect of a “dull white guy,” let us just say we’re indifferent to race, religion, national origin, all these factors. We’re not so much interested in a ticket that “looks like America,” in President Clinton’s phrase. We want one committed to the common-sense, constitutional principles that Mrs. Palin has been pushing. The big question is whether Governor Romney himself gets these points. We’re not of the view that what we need is a person who can read a balance sheet. We’re of the view that what we need is a person who can read the Constitution. The rest will follow. If the jury is out in respect of Mr. Romney on the constitutional fundamentals, we will learn a lot about him by whether he picks a candidate who can carry these points the way it has been done so heroically by the woman we like to call the Alert Alaskan.
If only the rest of the GOP had Sarah’s intelligence, moral clarity and principles. What we have instead are mostly spineless cowards.
via drudgereport.com today — http://washingtonexaminer.com/abortionist-sees-aborting-ugly-black-babies-as-a-service-to-the-taxpayers-apparently/article/2504231
This ain’t gonna be posted for long I suppose — whatever — http://www.klannedparenthood.com/History_of_Abortion_Statistics/
Let’s Go Sarah!!! … the woman who came on down from her home state of Alaska to save America!!!
@ Goldi Steiner, Founder and Chair of Canadians for Israel’s Legal Rights (CILR):
In the end you get what you deserve.
@ Pinchas:
Huh? Try killing a cow in India. Even in Israel there is no applied death penalty for murder. Your argument is without merit try again.
Yes, ethically, morally and based on Jewish law but not legalistically according to the man made laws of most countries.
Man may have been given dominion over the animal world but he was also charged with the responsibility to respect and care for his charges.
@ yamit82:
It is not ‘murder’ otherwise there would be a death penalty for it. Are you saying gentiles that hunt for sport are murderers?
All of the above comments are side issues, and not the crux of the matter. We are in danger of an Obama take over of America. A change that will be unstoppable should he be reelected. Instead, there is someone of the stature of Sara Palin, who with her down to earth, common sense and constitutional and moral principles could save America and Western Civilization.
Wake up People!!!!
@ yamit82:
Beautiful comment. Thank you.
@ Pinchas:
Vicariously killing any animal is ‘murder’, you morally challenged moron.
All Life is sacred, and people may not kill even animals, but humans must eat; in Judaism the concession is made therefore, to let people kill a few intellectually less advanced animals, and even that was limited to domesticated animals who people raised in the first place and rigidly regulated to minimize suffering. While gazelles are permitted as well you would have to catch it and slaughter it according to the laws of Kashrut not by hunting which is forbidden according to the laws of TZAAR BAALEI CHAYIM. It is practically impossible to catch gazelle with a trap and cut its throat in a precisely kosher manner.
My conclusion: Judaism stipulates that animals must be killed painlessly. Murder—even of animals, even out of utter necessity—is still murder and must not be enjoyed; that’s why Judaism opposes recreational hunting.
@ Shy Guy:
While in deference to her loyal cult followers on this site, I wouldn’t phrase my opinion of her in the same way but it does reflect basically my opinion of her.
Bozo was a clown and the name of my first dog. 😉