By Ted Belman
As this post on C4P points out, pundits both left and right, continue to bash the “irrelevant one”, Sarah Palin.
They just can’t stand the fact that Palin is the #1 ranked pundit by a long shot. This according to MEDIAite.
By Ted Belman
As this post on C4P points out, pundits both left and right, continue to bash the “irrelevant one”, Sarah Palin.
They just can’t stand the fact that Palin is the #1 ranked pundit by a long shot. This according to MEDIAite.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Palin is a common sense woman. She stands for principle, and is smart, strong and dedicated.
Too good for Americans.
If it is Obama they want, then that’s what they deserve.
Let’s see what happens in November.
@ yamit82:
Palin wants to maintain the US military strength but she also wants to avoid costly wars. She wants to stand by her friends. She always mentions Israel in this regard. Palin’s FOREIGN policy.
More than anything she wants good financial management i.e. don’t spend more than you have plus she wants to reduce the debt. She intends to do this by prioritizing expenditures. She knows how difficult that is but has done it during each of her 20 years in public service. She knows that the US has to cut back on entitlements and will tackle them.
@ yamit82:
This is typical liberal BS: Unless someone is “liberally educated” he/she is a moron and has no right to the debate. When someone from the opposite side has the very same credentials (acquired in a liberal university), they are meaningless because they belong to the wrong side.
This is one of the fundamental weapons used by the left to demonize others. The right use the same tactic.
The other day, in the Financial Time, an editor was wasting a lot of ink to explain the brilliant tactic used by our Pr. and the inability for Romney to cope with the constantly changing positions of the Pr. What the editor was describing (he was making the case for an Obama victory) was the exact definition of flip-flopping (F-F).
When a democrat F-F it it is brilliant tactic, when a republican does it it is it is incompetence!
Politics: the art of DECEPTION.
Cave canem!!!!! The media will do whatever it takes to save our Pr.!!!
@ Ted Belman:
What are “Time Tested Truths” that she relies on?
There are many structural reforms America can institute, but do the math.
Two unfunded wars, and a military that costs $1.4 trillion per year. What is the American budget deficit?
Has Palin suggested or proposed to reduce the Defense budget?
End stupid and wasteful wars?
Has any Republican? (Besides Ron Paul and his son)
Just a thought.
@ yamit82:
Her track record says otherwise. She has a great record. A leader has to listen then decide. From all accounts she is very good at that. She relies on time tested truths. What do you rely on?
@ yamit82:
That was exhibit “a”
And now, for exhibit “b”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/10/spain-jihad-against-dogs.html
To say that these people infected with Islam are a subhuman pos evil mutant aberration, would be indeed a strong understatement.
@ Laura:
This week Israel was hit by almost 100 rockets and mortars and we attacked Gaza in return. Not one MSM network reported the story including Fox News.
What was of interest to Americans according to what was broadcast?
EXAMPLE
CBS Top Stories:
Sandusky defense rests, coach won’t testify
Executive privilege asserted in “Fast and Furious”
French police capture gunman alive in standoff
New Greek PM Antonis Samaras sworn in
Mubarak reportedly in coma, off life support
Obama hits Romney for outsourcing jobs
Watch: Ex-TSA agent demos intrusive pat-down
Hero dog spurs new policy at women’s shelter
Sources: Pakistan nabs 9/11-linked al Qaeda figure
Dad’s frantic 911 call after halting alleged attacker
Watch: Alec Baldwin denies hitting photographer
3 dead, 2 wounded in Houston strip club shooting
48 Hours: Murder at the manor
@ Laura:
The only thing you know about Stanly Cook, Alan and even Katz is that they are very pro Palin. Is that enough for you to form such a definitive unequivocal opinion?
@ Laura:
I take it to mean right side of issues as opposed to wrong side of issues but then what is right and what is wrong side of an issue?
My sister is as liberal as you can find but really believes as you do, that she is right and you wrong, me too, we stopped arguing over politics long ago.
You believe Palin is on the right side of the issues and I believe she is a populist who is shallow, speaks mostly in one line euphemisms but in my opinion hasn’t a clue as to what the real underlying causes to America’s current crisis’s are. If you don’t understand what the problems are
and their causes you can’t know how to cure them or even if they are reversible.
She is on domestic issues more Libertarian than conservative and who knows what she believes on foreign policy and Americas role in the world?
Ted, please release my comment.
Anyone who eats meat is contributing to the killing of animals even if they themselves don’t hunt. I presume you must be a vegetarian, Yamit otherwise you contribute to the killing of defenseless animals.
I really don’t understand what motivates your hatred of Sarah even as she is pro-Israel. Is it that she opposes socialism, that she believes in American expectionalism and doesn’t apologize for America? That is the kind of moral clarity that also causes her to love Israel.
@ yamit82:
DeSales University in the Lehigh Valley PA is the number One school in the country for the Physicians Assistance program.
Maria (from Brooklyn) a DeSales graduate assisted the orthopedic surgeon who did my total knee replacement last year.
@ rongrand:
Yup, that’s her. 🙂 The son is now learning to be a doctors assistant? Poor sis. My son the doctors asst., is not the same as “My Son The Doctor”
That’s what happens with only child syndrome where parents live vicariously through their kids.
@ alan:
Some lovers of Palin are pro life and strongly anti abortion. Others feel just as strongly about hunting and hunters. Palin compared criticism of her hunting Bears with Obama eating as a child dog in Indonesia.
She is so obtuse not to see the difference. While Obama as a youth according to his Book ate dog, an Asian Staple of protean, he did not hunt the dog, kill the dog, skin the dog and butcher the dog as Palin does by choice not necessity or custom. She likes killing defenseless animals.
By bringing up a comparison with Obama and the leftist media who make fun of her hunting shows that she is not bright nor capable of relating to the mainstream of America. Who purchase their meats mostly in supermarkets under Vet. inspection and with a lot of assurance that the beast they will eat was slaughtered in a humane manner under sanitary conditions. It ain’t like she can’t afford to buy meat in a supermarket or butcher shop if they still exist, Even in Alaska. She enjoys the hunt and the kill. Yet she maintains she is pro life?
All Jews should oppose hunting as a moral and ethical issue whose importance is second only to the preservation of human life.
Maimonides taught that although Jewish Law permits the use of animals “when necessary,” great care must be taken to observe the compassion dictated by tzaar baalei chaim. Humanity must always remember, said Maimonides, that “the Universe does not exist for man’s sake,” that each animal “exists for its own sake,” and that animals, like humans, experience both emotional and physical pain.
Indeed, said Maimonides, in some circumstances “there is no difference…between the pain of man and the pain of other living things.” The Sefer ha-Chinuch, a 13th century Spanish commentary on the Torah, affirms the need for compassion toward animals, explaining that when a human soul “becomes accustomed to have pity…upon animals…[it] will likewise grow accustomed to be kind to human beings.”
Rabbi Yisroel ben Eliezer—also known as Ba’al Shem Tov or the Besht—was the 18th century founder of Hasidic Judaism. According to the Besht, every creature is infused with Divine sparks. Early Hasidic rabbis explained that these sparks give all creatures vitality and that “there is nothing material which has vitality without holiness.”
Although early Hasidic rabbis saw all creatures as filled with Divine sparks and therefore holy, they continued to permit animals to be used for food, clothing, and other purposes, as long as the animals were treated with compassion and reverence. Despite rabbinic agreement that such uses were permissible, some rabbis were distressed by the plight of “resource” animals. According to these rabbis, a caged animal is equivalent to an imprisoned human being. Caged animals must be purchased and released since “‘ransoming prisoners’…constitutes a moral imperative.” Other rabbis prayed for “forgiveness” from animals and other members of creation because we have “sinned against them” both physically and spiritually.
@ yamit82:
Yamit (Uncle Nahum)is this the sister who wants her son to be a doctor?
@ yamit82:
Only if she stands on the right side of the issues.
@ yamit82:
Stanley Cook, Alan and myself are what’s right about America, as is Sarah.
@ alan:
My sister is considered bright and has two doctorates, has an administrative job earning in the 6 figures. According to you she should be president?
Another example of what is wrong with America. It’s Americans like you.
Palin has become for some a cult figure and is “Idol” worshiped by many in that cult.
I am not into cults or Idol worship.
Sarah is bright. Sarah is well educated. Sarah should be president.
Yamit, every time you publish a comment, you become more liberal and say stupid stuff about anyone who differs from your conveluted mentality.
@ Stanley Cook:
This is the best explanation I’ve read explaining what is wrong with America. It’s Americans like you.
I have always stood with Sarah Palin 99.7% of the time and will continue