ByWilliam A. Levinson, AMERICAN THINKER
Militant Islam has far more in common with Nazism and Communism than it does with any genuine religious faith. All three have two common elements: (1) the openly stated intention to rule the entire world and (2) a claim to the right to deport, oppress, re-educate, or exterminate those who do not fit into their regimes. Militant Islam can, despite the lessons of 1939-1945 as well as the Holodomor (genocide by starvation of Ukrainians), China’s Cultural Revolution, Stalin’s Great Purge, and the killing fields of Cambodia, promote this agenda today by masquerading as a religion, with all the legal and social protections that this implies.
Militant Islam Says It Will Dominate the World
“Your Job in Germany,” which was created by Theodor Seuss Geisel for the U.S. Army, discusses the Hitlerjugend (Hitler Youth) explicitly starting at about 6:30. “They were brought up on straight propaganda, products of the worst educational crime in the history of the entire world.” That was true until the Hamasjugend, which is better-known as the Palestinian children’s show Pioneers of Tomorrow, came along.
In Pioneers of Tomorrow, a Mickey Mouse clone named Farfur talks explicitly of “world leadership under Islamic leadership.” The girl who co-hosts the show elaborates that “[w]e, the great ones [Herrenvolk], started this program to lead the world. The nucleus [Axis], with the will of Allah, will be here in Palestine.” Another Pioneers of Tomorrow video says openly, “We will annihilate the Jews[,]” and “[w]e’ve said more than once that becoming masters of the world requires the following; first, to be happy with our Arabic language.” The last ideology that talked about annihilating Jews and becoming master of the world came with a swastika.
Pioneers of Tomorrow is far from the only militant Islamic source that proclaims its intention to dominate the world, as shown here. Militant Islamic behavior in most of Europe and even parts of the United States suggests, meanwhile, that they believe they already rule the world and are therefore exempt from laws against, for example, rape. Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali said of militant Islamic men who rape Australian women:
If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it, whose fault is it; the cats or the uncovered meat? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab (veil), no problem would have occurred.
There are also unfit U.S. jurists who are willing to go along with arguments of this nature, as shown by the judge in New Jersey who agreed that sharia (Islamic law) gave a man the right to force his wife to have sexual intercourse.
We have shown how militant Islam’s purported right to rule the world is one aspect of a murderous political ideology. Its purported right to kill or subjugate other people is the other aspect.
Militant Islam Claims the Right to Exterminate “Undesirables”
Nazism, Communism, and militant Islam all claim or claimed the right to deport, oppress, re-educate, or exterminate undesirables, as shown in Table 1:
Table 1. Targets for Reeducation or Liquidation
| Nazism | Communism | Militant Islam |
| Jews
Homosexuals Slavs Gypsies Jehovah’s Witnesses |
Counterrevolutionaries
Bourgeoisie Kulaks (Ukrainian farmers who resisted collectivization) Educated class (in some cases, anybody with eyeglasses) |
Jews
Wrong kinds of Muslims |
If militant Islam is simply another incarnation of Communism or Nazism — “Hitler in a Headscarf,” as Michael Savage puts it — then why can it operate in plain view? The short answer is that its status as a purported religion gives it legal and social protections that are not available to an ideology.
An Ideology Is Not a Religion
The glorification of Nazism is illegal in many European countries, but so is criticism of militant Islamic behavior. Geert Wilders was, for example, put on trial for inciting “religious discrimination.” Danish Member of Parliament Jesper Langballe was found guilty of “hate speech” for his truthful statements that honor killings are endemic among Muslim families. “Under Danish jurisprudence it is immaterial whether a statement is true or untrue. All that is needed for a conviction is that somebody feels offended.”
It is specifically illegal in Germany to display a swastika, and it took some time for German courts to make an exception for anti-fascist material that depicts, for example, somebody throwing a swastika into a trash can. Germany will still prosecute you, though, if you depict a militant Islamic symbol in a trash can. It is legally and socially acceptable to behave like a Nazi in modern Germany as long as one is smart enough to use a crescent instead of a swastika, and chant “Allahu akbar!” instead of “Heil Hitler!”
Murderous Ideologies and Their Enablers
Opposition to Nazism during the late 1930s and early 1940s was in no way racist toward German-Americans. Almost all members of the German-American Bund were of German ancestry, but very few people of German ancestry joined the Bund. The problem Germans were easily identifiable through behavioral choices such as goose-stepping, heiling Hitler, and waving swastika flags. Most Muslim-Americans are similarly loyal citizens, while the problems are again easily identifiable from their behavioral choices.
The Nazis did, however, have their enablers, including America First, and so do the militant Muslims. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) condemned Dutch politician Geert Wilders for his outspoken views on the way the shadow of militant Islam is falling over Europe as that of the swastika did 70 or so years ago. Tufts University’s Committee on Student Life as chaired by Professor Barbara Grossman, meanwhile, decreed that “labeling Islam violent is unacceptable in any way, shape, or form.” When last we heard, the 9/11 hijackers did not chant “Shma Yisrael,” “Hare Krishna,” or “Jesus Saves,” although “Allah akbar!” figured prominently in what was last heard from the doomed aircraft.
Bucknell administrator Kathy Owens (with the apparent knowledge and approval of President Brian Mitchell), meanwhile, called on the carpet three members of the university’s conservative student newspaper for using the phrase “hunting terrorists.” The terrorists in question were incidentally al-Qaeda or Taliban. It is doubtful that anybody would have had a problem with language like “hunting Nazis” in 1942. This underscores our key point: militant Islam, unlike Nazism or Communism, shields itself from criticism under color of religion. The defense of civilization therefore requires us to recognize militant Islam for what it is: a murderous ideology with aspirations of world domination and genocide of those who do not fit into its depraved worldview.
William A. Levinson, P.E. is the author of several books on business management including content on organizational psychology, as well as manufacturing productivity and quality.
@ dweller:
dear dweller,
you have pretty much beat me to the punch…
so will just post a HUGE ‘ditto’ to your comment to yasmin…
@ Yasmin:
Of course you are.
And it shows.
Blessed.
Indeed.
Like nobody before or after, right.
The Sudanese might have a little something to say about that
— if the OTHERS who find such claims a trifle incongruous will let them get a word in edgewise.
And assuming you’re emotionally equipped to handle differences of opinion.
And your intestinal gas comes pre-packaged in ziplock plastic refrigerator bags, right?
So you’ve led a sheltered life till now, have you?
Dad hid the truth from you, did he?
“The natives”? — and who might they be?
— and how, exactly, did they come to BE ‘native’?
I’m sure there must be some connection between that statement and the price of bananas — but I keeping drawing a blank.
C’mom, help me out here. Give me a clue.
A hint.
Ah. . . . there is the line whereby you give yourself away.
Who else thinks in terms of wanting their religion to “rule the world”?
Learn to rule yourself, Sweetheart
— and the world will do just fine.
@ Yasmin:
Well what do you know….
My ‘friend’ yasmina ,from a previous thread ,has graced us with some musloid comments that could not be ANY further from the truth….
An answer shall be posted to these Mendacious statements ( it is getting late around my neck of the woods now).
Good night taquyia queen!
The column above is total nonsense. Islam is a religion whose adherants transformed humanity from darkness to light. We are blessed like nobody before or after us was or will be. Everything we touch, sparkles.
How dare you compare to nazims, and communism. Racism is not a part of Islam so how does it equate to nazism? We built the foundations for the world, the rock the world leans on. No religion is more suited to rule the world than Islam. We built the finest empires. The worlds most influential, and richest men are Muslims, what didn’t we give to the human race? art, literature, music, geography, maths, algebra, astronomy, literature, calligraphy, science, respect of family and women, animal rights, human rights, civil rights, medicine, and millions more things we blessed humanity with, they all have the Muslim hand behind them.
All my Jewish friends and dads business partners I love, and I never met disgusting people like you before Mr levinsons, yamit82, you must be the ones who pull up the olive groves, and steal and rob, take land and kill the natives and people living there. He knows many Jews and Israels richest man is dads business partner.
@ Crystal K.:
Edith Stein was a German-Jewish philosopher, a saint of the Catholic Church, who died at Auschwitz. In April 1933 she wrote a letter to Pope Pius XI, in which she denounced the Nazi regime and asked the Pope to openly denounce the regime “to put a stop to this abuse of Christ’s name.”
“Martin Rhonheimer asserts that “Questioning the legitimacy of the Nazis’ racial policy, and possibly even slowing it down, required the condemnation from the very start of measures that discriminated against Jews and deprived them of their rights—as well as condemnation of the regime that instituted such measures. This is precisely what Edith Stein, bitterly aware that the German bishops were allowing themselves to be deceived, demanded of Pius XI in her now widely publicized letter of early April 1933.” The timing of the letter coincides with the period when Hitler was trying to convince the bishops of his good will towards the Roman Catholic Church in order to obtain a Concordat which both sides signed in July 1933. Stein’s letter received no answer!“
@ Bill Levinson:
Good one 🙂
An extremely well written article.
@ Crystal K.:
Heroic speech
Telling It How It Is
@ Crystal K.:
@ Crystal K.:
No problem:
This video is based on a speech by Rodney Atkinson at a public meeting at the Houses of Parliament on 26th Feb 2008 -updated 2010
The EU is based on the Nazi plans published in Berlin in 1942 ” The Eu was founded and initially led by “former” Nazis and fascists, as was the Charlemagne prize awarded to TONY BLAIR, EDWARD HEATH, ROY JENKINS and others for their role in removing democratic sovereignty from the nation
states of Europe”
RODNEY ATKINSON is a former adviser to Ministers and an internationally praised author of 6 books on political economy and the crisis caused by the European superstate. He has broadcast on radio and television in the UK, Germany, Poland, Yugoslavia, Austria and the USA, and his books have been sold in more than 50 countries.
The EU Hitlers Dream Come True
I got a lot more if you are not yet convinced.
Yamit wrote :
‘The EU was founded by Nazi and promoted by Nazis and…’
this is ridiculous. Was Adenauer a nazi? Were De Gasperi, Segni, Schuman…?!!! Please articulate your blasphemy
Yamit wrote : “The one time the Pope stood up to Hitler was the Papal protection of the Jews of Rome known today as the Popes Jews…”
Correct, but it would be unfair to say ‘The Church’
as a whole, since a lot of hidden protection was given in religious institutes, Monasteries etc.(in Italy at least, as far as I know) with or without the Vatican’s knowledge -and this is fact.
Apparently,Yamit hasn’t read nor heard about “Mit Brennender Sorge” directed to the German Bishops. Pius XI’s untimely death was an historic tragedy. He challenged Hitler with powerful words and courage – his successor lacked both. Meanwhile, till the Vatican’s archives on this issue are finally disclosed, Pius XII’s role is contradictory and arguable, two opposite interpretations are still possible, for truth’s sake.
Hitler had over 80% support of the German people at the height of his successes, This decreased gradually when he began to lose. The Church fully supported Hitler and Mussolini. The one time the Pope stood up to Hitler was the Papal protection of the Jews of Rome known today as the Popes Jews. This shows that he could have done more for other Jews but didn’t.
A Nazi is one who agrees with the Nazi ideology in all or part. Membership in the established political party apparatus was not the sole criteria for Nazi identification nor was wearing a Nazi Uniform, etc. In the minds and hearts most Germans, they agreed with the Nazi ideology.
Every Muslim agrees with Islamic ideology and principles and their primary loyalty is to Islam. You don’t have to chop off heads to believe that those doing the chopping, bombing or shooting the infidels are behaving correctly according to Islam. Most will behave themselves when they feel they don’t have the requisite numbers and support but when they do the whole society becomes radicalized.
The Germans today are well on the way to actualizing the German and Nazi dream of unifying all of Europe under German rule. The EU was founded by Nazi and promoted by Nazis and now some think a United States of Europe is not far off led by the only country in Europe with a real economy.
After Europe? The world…
@ NormanF:
Mr. F, Liberalism is code for Marxism–Islam does in fact have a profound affinity with Marxism.
This enlightenment was and is Protestantism.
The above are genuine religious beliefs–genuinely evil and Godless.
Of course Abe Foxman and the ADL condemned Gert Wilders–Abe Foxman and the ADL regularly condemn the good and praise and promote the profoundly evil, e.g., homosexual perversion–even to small children!
The author left out one very important evil Godless religion–Catholicism; Catholicism is responsible for well over fifty million murders of genuine Christians and also of Jews, et al.; these were during the “dark ages” which the Catholic church created and completely approve of and revere the murderous ringleaders of to this day–and the Catholic church has not stopped murdering! Catholicism has caused more harm to the human race than all of the other Godless religions combined.
Nazism is Marxism [communism] but different from Soviet Marxism in that it had [has] elements of both right and left, whereas Soviet Marxism is all from the left.
The Nazi hierarchy only opposed certain homosexuals [the effeminate mainly]–whereas homosexuality was commonly accepted and indulged in among the Nazi hierarchy. Hitler’s supposed anti homosexual purge of Ernst Rome was just an excuse to get rid of a potential rival.
The author left out Christians in Nazi communism and communism–these were and are huge targets–millions of Christians have been murdered by communism–also left out of communism were Jews who are also a huge target.
This is a very poorly written article–incomplete–if I were to grade it the author would receive a zero.
The author shows a profound lack of understanding of Nazism, communism and Islam–the author did not mention Catholicism and its important relation to the above religions–the author is incompetent!
There is no “moderate” Islam. Islam is opposed to the values of the Enlightenment that transformed Europe.
In the Muslim World, there is a choice between an enlightened autocrat or a fanatical theocrat.
Its not going to produce a Western-style democracy. When given freedom of choice, Muslims invariably vote for an even harsher dictator.
As we’ve seen in the Arab Spring, Islam is not sympathetic to liberalism and secularism. To say there is a civilization in the Muslim World is the ultimate oxymoron.
@ AJ – Raalte:
Levinson is a PC liberal posing as a conservative, that’s why. He separates Islam , just as the Liberals do . Your question is valid and I would like Levinson to ans it.
… and under colour of colour.
Excellent column.
Why do you insist on qualifying Islam with this “militant”? By doing so, you make it seem as if there are different forms of Islam, some of which are acceptable, instead of forming the civilian pool from which the killers spring and in which they hide until ready to do something militantly.
Why then don’t you write about “militant Nazism” and/or “militant Communism” as well? I’m sure not ALL Nazi’s and/or Communists were murderous swine!