The New World Order: Bilderbergs

5 Comments / 5 Comments

1. It is interesting how that when you delve into this stuff you get labeled a “conspiracy theorist”
   What is interesting about it is that the movement to social-internationalism the elephant in the living room.
   Listen to the politicians, the UN Assembly, the human rights groups they are all preaching it.
   The media leaks everything that will cause harm if it will further their agenda but they won’t touch the issue of the elitists power structure.

   Compare how the media treats national security secrets to they way they treat the plans of international elitists:

   “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great
   publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion
   for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if
   we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more
   sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty
   of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National autodetermination
   practiced in past centuries”–David Rockefeller’s address at a Trilateral Commission meeting
   in June of 1991

   We (society in general) don’t believe the Islamic militants when they say they are going to annihilate us and we do not believe the most powerful men in the world when they say they are going to control us.

2. Ted, Randy,

   Many thanks for posting this important topic.Have a look at most of the Rhodes Scholars at Oxford University in Great Britain (UK,England) and invariably you will find people of a “one world government” internationalist mindset who went on to become Presidents and Prime Ministers – or leading government and corporate big business officials – of Western countries (especially the US, Australia, United Kingdom and EU countries).

   These people who dominate the top key government positions in Western countries are all thoroughly indoctrinated with the globalist internationalist mindset of neo-liberal globalist corporatism – a form of Fascism.

   Ted, have you read the book “Fascist Europe Rising” by British author, Rodney Atkinson? I highly recommend this book as required reading to understand the Nazi origins of the German-led supranational EU super-state and the EU’s ultimate goals.

   Mr. Atkinson runs a website called “Free Nations” and is a fierce critic of the Nazi SS founded European Union (EU)

   as well as the Rockefeller/Brzezinski-founded Trilateral Commission,and Bilderberg group: globalist internationalist sister organizations of the CFR.

   There is abundant evidence that the Wall Street super-capitalists and “Robber Barons” of John D. Rockefeller (bankroller, along with Andrew Carnegie, of the early 20th century “Eugenics” or “Racial Hygiene” movement in the U.S. & pre-war Germany which led to Hitler’s “Final Solution”) J.P. Morgan, Averell Harriman, Prescott Bush,Henry Ford,Max & Paul Warburg et al, were instrumental in the rise of Adolf Hitler to power.

   These people were in most cases behind the bankrolling of today’s globalist internationalist organizations such as the CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg group (founded by an ex-Nazi SS officer, Joseph Retinger) et al, who also just happen to be the financiers behind the foundation of such collectivist anti-Semitic forums such as the UN.They are also behind the drive to destroy Israel by directly funding and supporting her mortal enemies. The same people were, not surprisingly, also behind EU/NATO’s war on the Serbs.

   Ted, Randy: this is a subject we really need to cover in more depth and detail. Perhaps a collaborative effort between yourself, Randy and me would be an idea well worth looking into.

3. Mr. Belman, longtime reader first post(I Think?) Recently you had posted an article by one Barry Chamish, an author whose works I have been following for a long time now. This article is basically old news and nothing new if you have been reading the articles and books by Mr. Chamish. Maybe if more people read what he has to say, other than being sick to the stomach about what is REALLY happening behind the scenes in the U.S., Europe AND Israel they would wake up to the trouble ahead.

   All The Best.

4. Add this link to your collection on this subject. It is part 1 of 4 and explains the New World Order process for over 100 years.

5. Ted, you are really stating to make Israpundit even more interesting and probably more controversial with the selection of articles such as this one and the fascinating article about China’s low-intensity “Unrestricted Warfare.”

   I noticed that in the above article touching on the New World Order a paragraph emphasized in bold reads:

   “Certain leading power-brokers on both sides of the Atlantic were of the opinion that Europe and America were not united in their global policies, and that a meeting of both the mind and spirit was needed to forge a more powerful international union whose final goal was world governance.”

   Some historical background on this can be found in Britain around the turn of the 20th century. At that time some of the greatest minds in England were assembled to form a strategy to save the British Empire which was showing cracks. They formed a think-tank called the Round Table Group of Great Britain, which purpose was to reestablish the British Commonwealth of Nations and, ultimately, to bring the world under the domination of a restored British Empire.

   Founding members included Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner and HG Wells. What they came up with was the formation of a global master/slave society based upon the principles of eugenics as derived from Plato’s Republic and ruled by western elitist.

   They advocated Malthusian Eugenics, the philosophy of depopulation through the reduction of inferior races –“human weeds”– and the selective breeding of “a race of thoroughbreds” as described early in this century by Rockefeller-funded, Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger. This is also known as was known as Social Darwinism and it is still a major agenda carried on today by the United Nations.

   In the end, the only hope these men could see of saving at least some pf Britain’s global power and influence was to couple with the Atlantic Community (the USA) since America was a rising power. In the end they failed to achieve their goals but the cause was carried on by those who followed.

   Many of the elitist think tanks today are a result of the Round Table. Three of these powerful think tank offshoots that would come about and pattern themselves after the Round Table, are: (1) the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), organized in 1919 in London; (2) the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), organized in 1921 in New York City; and (3) the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR), organized in 1925 or the twelve countries holding territory in what today we call the Pacific Rim.