The civilizational war that Jean Raspail once envisioned in his brilliant, dystopian novel The Camp of the Saints is now fully underway. What Raspail once only imagined has come to pass. People of color from many formerly colonized countries have created “no go” zones all across Europe; ambulances and the police enter there at their own risk.
The “youth,” the opportunistic criminal elements, the proto-jihadists (all of whom survive on the European dole), are torching cars, looting stores, battling the police.
Even as I write, black Brits are killing Muslim Brits and rioting against the police. Muslim Brits are threatening to kill whatever and whoever.
Have Europeans traditionally been racists? Yes, of course they have. Remember the Holocaust against the Jews. They learned no lessons.
More recently, did European governments allow immigrants to stay because they were willing to do work Europeans refused to do? Yes they did.
Are Europe’s “multicultural” policies—which allowed immigrants, up to the third generation, not to integrate, not to westernize—also really racist policies? Yes, of course they are.
All you anti-racists: Now hear this. Multicultural relativism and multicultural policies have failed not because they are too indulgent but rather because they are essentially racist policies which have one standard for ethnic Europeans and another standard for immigrants of color. Are there immigrant, class, faith, and color issues that need to be resolved in Europe? Absolutely—but due to the nature of jihad-via-satellite and jihad-via-internet the violent rioters in England resemble the violent rioters in Gaza or on the West Bank, or the violent rioters all across the Arab world.
The ski masks and keffiyas most resemble Arabs participants engaged in an “intifada,” or uprising. It does not matter if the European participant is an African-Caribbean-Brit or a south east Asian Brit. The model of nihilistic insurrection is Arab and “Palestinian” in style.
Non-violent demonstrations (and there have been many in Europe, certainly in England), about college tuition, housing, and employment, do not look like this—although, ‘tis true, many European, allegedly pacifist political demonstrations have turned ugly in jihadist-like ways.
These issues are not confined to Europe nor are they confined to European immigrants. The underlying, perhaps intractable problems are simmering and boiling in a new kind of “non-melting pot” stew in which all standards have been lowered, both by Western government employers, unions, educational institutions, and the media..
The solution? In terms of Europe and the chosen Intifada template: The same world that allowed the Arab terrorists to practice their diabolical arts mainly on Israelis and Jews have now reaped the whirlwind.
May God have mercy on us all.
The precise make-up of the British rioters is still not being accurately reported. Even Hasidic Jews have been mentioned:
http://cifwatch.com/2011/08/08/guardian-report-on-london-riots-omits-the-race-or-ethnicity-of-rioters-but-still-mentions-jews/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8689004/London-riots-why-did-the-police-lose-control.html
Laura: She said so because the rioting and pillaging yobs do include a lot of white natives. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8694561/London-riots-live.html For a change this is not a direct Jihadist issue, even if Jihadists are trying to leverage the mess.
So why did Ann Coulter write a column claiming the rioters in Britain were white native Brits? Has she become an apologist for jihad too?
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2011-08-10.html