The OpenVAERS Red Box Report
VAERS reached another grim milestone: 1,000,227 reports of injury following coronavirus vaccines. This is unprecedented in the history of the U.S. vaccine program.
In the 31-year history of VAERS, there are 9,248 reports of fatalities following other vaccines. Since the start of the coronavirus vaccine campaign there have been 21,002 reports of death following coronavirus vaccines.
110,609 reports of hospitalization and 10,640 heart attacks following coronavirus vaccinations are also horrifying new records.
Meanwhile CDC fixers Tom Shimabukuro and John Su spend their days working feverishly to try to make the signals go away. But the signals refuse to go away because the data is the data and millions of people are waking up to the truth that these products are dangerous.
Every day of the last two years has been heartbreaking. The only silver lining is that so many of you share the data with others and in the process bring forward the day when justice shall be done.
The OpenVAERS Team
1. https://stevekirsch.substack.
<
|
|
|---|
@Reader
I have been looking for this post of yours for two days so I could mention somethings, so, sorry for the delay.
This is often true with viruses present in the normal flora on or in the body, however, the part about the cold temperatures being the cause of illness is not true. This is a very common belief among people but it is very inaccurate. The body regulates itself at a constant temperature and unless something very wrong goes on, such as a massive illness or being out in extreme cold long enough to cause hypothermia, the body just burns more energy to keep the body’s core at the routine body temp. If the body’s temp did fall, the enzymes in the body’s cells would be compromised and many immune defenses such as the innate immune system could be compromised.
The real reason that people associate the cold with creating conditions to increase illness is that the cold weather of winter is associated with many conditions that actually do cause reduced immunity. The most important of these is low Vit. D levels. Everyone above the 35th Parallel needs supplementation of Vit D over the winter because the sun does not stimulate the body to generate its own Vit D. Below the 35th Parallel, where you can generate Vit D, people are still prone to stay indoors due to the chilly weather, til you get to the tropics where it is always warm. Another issue associated with the cold is a lack of water intake. Nobody likes to drink in the winter. They sip hot drinks, which means less fluids, or they just don’t drink much water. This affects a major respiratory defense against viruses and bacteria. Their is also the dry winter air (lack of humidity) and viruses move much easier between infected and susceptible people. Also being indoors helps people who get viral infections to spread them to others, due to the closed confinement, and the viruses get pumped into the contained space in higher concentrations over days. These are some of the major issues.
But it isn’t the cold that actually makes people sick, it’s what the cold brings with it that causes winter weather illnesses. Just FYI.
@Reader
This is true, but the issue is dependent on two factors:
1. the robustness of the immune response which is diminished in the elderly and immune compromised and the severely ill.
2. the relative size and speed of onset of the actual infection present.
The immune system is very responsive, but it can be over run by numbers and speed, such that people can get sick to some degree even as the immune system is responding to a return visit by some invader who is present in very large numbers or very quickly, where the immune system needs to pull some other tricks to help it pull things back into order.
@Edgar
Not an ignorant comment at all, but quite accurate. The bacteria that exists in the GI and respiratory tracts and along the skin of the body are quite important and provide an essential form of crowd control to prevent more unpleasant, disease presenting bacteria from gaining a foothold in the already crowded surfaces of the body – inside and outside as it were – and limits any entry into the body to only limited numbers because of this crowd control. This is one of the problems associated with taking antibiotics is that they will often kill off these good, non-disease presenting bacteria(called normal flora) which would allows more aggressive bacteria to access the boundaries of the body, again in skin, GI and respiratory surfaces, and attack the body due to this free access to these surfaces – they can’t get in without getting close. More than this the bacteria can actually serve a purpose beyond simply place holders as they can help with digestion and provide other forms of assistance. The body knows these bacteria and are capably able to keep them at bay without difficulty. But when the body is challenged with a serious illness, even these friendly non-disease presenting bugs can jump the defenses, as it were, and cause some problems – but it is due to the body’s defenses being reduced due to disease, or chemotherapy, or other immune suppressing influences.
@Edgar G.
I remember reading a very long time ago that the way the cold viruses actually cause disease is when an organism is weakened by something.
For example, people think that colds are caused by cold weather but they are actually caused by the virus already sitting inside the body which could no longer resist the virus properly since the body had been weakened by fighting the cold temperatures.
I hope it’s not too confusing.
I don’t know whether the info is correct or not but it seems to make sense considering that humans are normally full of viruses anyway but most rarely get sick.
There is also a well known tendency to “catch” various illnesses while under a lot of stress, etc.
@Michael
One thing I forgot to mention regarding this subject of co-infection with SARS-Cov2 and influenza virus, is that they are mutual competitors of ACE2 receptors. Wuhan-strain, Alpha, Beta…Delta have all entered the cell via the ACE2 receptor(though not exclusively as they used other receptors as well including the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors). Meanwhile, it is believe that Omicron actually directly bonds to the cell membrane without the need for the ACE2 receptor. If this is true it explains a great deal why Omicron is beating the sunlight out of Delta, which has a very fast rate of infection – Omicron infectivity is 70X greater than Delta(that is a lot). This news about the cell entry of Omicron is very hot off the presses(read as ‘may be inaccurate’), it came out yesterday or day b4, so it might be incorrect, but if it can be verified as reliably true, this would be a reason you would find the opportunistic infection of flu with Omicron and not previous SARS-Cov2 variants – because the ACE2 receptor is not occupied by a irreversibly bound Spike and SARS-Cov2 virus.
@Edgar
The use of aspirin has been seen to be quite helpful per reports in mild cases. There are of course stronger compounds that can be used in more serious cases. The onset of action(where you will see some effect, but not peak effect) on platelets is about twenty minutes in a healthy person. Some use in following a heart attack and the onset of action is reduced. Per research a few years back, they found the reason is due to cortisol(stress hormone) and other components being released into the blood that delay the onset to upto 2 hrs – I have to admit the cortisol explanation doesn’t make sense to me so I believe it is related to the other things. In any case, I would expect a delayed response could be expected with the micro clots based on the effects with heart attacks. The activity of the aspirin peaks about 48hrs after administration. Some people may think that is a long time, but it is pretty quick actually.
One thing to note. Aspirin is a blood thinner. So is IVM. I know you are in bloody Canada where the country is run by the Court Jester in Black Face so you don’t have access to it, but for anyone taking IVM, they should consult a doctor before attempting the use of aspirin as well. Blood clots are bad, but overdoing the blood thinning has its own serious consequences.
cf: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2764787
Dr. Sarah D. Meskill says,
cf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31980966/
I will add, however, that most references say co-infection is rare. Meskill says elsewhere,
“The studies looking at previous coronavirus infection with influenza are so sparse it’s really hard to know (whether those can work with flu and cause you to have more severe disease)”
Thanks, Peloni and Reader, for your helpful comments.
@READER-
Allow me to interject my likely ignorant comment. I would think that just having them on the skin or elsewhere does not mean “infection’ in the sense that you mean. Some may be symbiotic, and others may only infect when the immune system is low enough.
i read many years ago, that within seconds after washing even with a disinfectng solution, many of the germs are back in place already. Of course disinfectants may have improved, but many are ages old.
(e.g) We use 70% alcohol wipes presently; alcohol has been used for hundreds of years.
Just based on faint recollections.., likely wrong. Michael is the go-to for this.
@PELONI-
Just a few small questions. Re the micro clots, is asperin any good agajnst such. How long would asperin need to be take to have it’s effect on the platelets. Is it immediate after absorption, or does it require a certain “build-up” period of days or weeks..??
Thanks.
@Michael S
I am no expert but I read somewhere at least a year ago that an average human has around 50 different viruses inside him/her plus 3.5 pounds of bacteria.
This means 3 things:
1) everyone is infected with numerous pathogens at any given time (sorry, you germaphobic OCD sufferers);
2) just because someone is “infected” doesn’t mean s/he will get sick – that’s what our immune systems protect us from;
3) chances are Israel developed or found a test which differentiates between TWO kinds of viruses! (WOW! See (1))
I hope that they are not going to use this “discovery” to approve/require a corona shot and a flu shot at the same time.
@Michael
Double infection. So I guess they have decided to be creative with creating a term that might scare more of the remaining vaccine hold-outs towards their vaccine fetish, or perhaps the term predates the current epidemic, I have never heard it referenced as such. Interesting coin of terms though. Such things as multiple infections is very common and should always be anticipated in severe illness, especially if the patient is immune suppressed. In fact, any serious infection will challenge the immune system and setup the possibility of a secondary infection (also referred to as opportunistic infections) from either viral, bacterial or fungal sources. Both Covid and the Covid inoculations are associated with severe inflammatory responses. This is why secondary infections should always be suspected as possible with Covid, which is why antibiotics(not to mention the missing antivirals and anti-clotting drugs) not being a part of a balanced treatment plan to Covid is a novel approach to a novel virus that stimulates a hyper-inflammatory response that will lower the body’s ability to fight off any such opportunistic infection.
The possibility of a secondary, ie opportunistic, infection is actually why a good broad spectrum antibiotic (effective against a range of bacteria) is routinely prescribed for a patient with any serious viral infection, or serious bacterial infection as well. The antibiotic is to cover for the possibility that a non-pathogenic bug (one that does not usually cause disease, from the skin or GI tract for example) might become pathogenic(disease causing) due to the overburdened immune system.
The reason the flu has not been more reported as coincident with Covid is likely because it has been diagnosed as Covid. So, the secondary infection is important, because it can destabilize a patient who might otherwise recover from the primary infection, ie Covid, but succumbs to the combined double-whammy of the initial infection and its opportunistic ally. There can, in fact be more than a single such opportunistic infection, so the ‘double’ in double infection might soon be referred to triple or quadruple infections. Such silly games.
@Michael
Double infection. So I guess they have decided to be creative with creating a term that might scare more of the remaining vaccine hold-outs towards their vaccine fetish, or perhaps the term predates the current epidemic, I have never heard it referenced as such. Interesting coin of terms though. Such things as multiple infections is very common and should always be anticipated in severe illness, especially if the patient is immune suppressed. In fact, any serious infection will challenge the immune system and setup the possibility of a secondary infection (also referred to as opportunistic infections) from either viral, bacterial or fungal sources. Both Covid and the Covid inoculations are associated with severe inflammatory responses. This is why secondary infections should always be suspected as possible with Covid, which is why antibiotics(not to mention the missing antivirals and anti-clotting drugs) not being a part of a balanced treatment plan to Covid is a novel approach to a novel virus that stimulates a hyper-inflammatory response that will lower the body’s ability to fight off any such opportunistic infection.
The possibility of a secondary, ie opportunistic, infection is actually why a good broad spectrum antibiotic (effective against a range of bacteria) is routinely prescribed for a patient with any serious viral infection, or serious bacterial infection as well. The antibiotic is to cover for the possibility that a non-pathogenic bug (one that does not usually cause disease, from the skin or GI tract for example) might become pathogenic(disease causing) due to the overburdened immune system.
The reason the flu has not been more reported as coincident with Covid is likely because it has been diagnosed as Covid. So, the secondary infection is important, because it can destabilize a patient who might otherwise recover from the primary infection, ie Covid, but succumbs to the combined double-whammy of the initial infection and its opportunistic ally. There can, in fact be more than a single such opportunistic infection, so the ‘double’ in double infection might soon be referred to triple or quadruple infections. Such silly games.
Over 100,000 hospitalizations, and the vaccines haven’t been recalled? Fauci should be guillotined for the 21,000 REPORTED deaths (plus many times that not reported). I hope the day of reckoning comes on Nov. 3.
Meanwhile, a seemingly ridiculous claim:
I never heard of such a “double viral infection”. Is this some kind of “new science??”
Peloni, input please.