Michael Bloomberg became a multi-billionaire by understanding global markets. He analyzed the 2020 U.S. presidential political marketplace and concluded three things:
- None of the hysterical, radically leftist Democrat candidates can beat President Trump in 2020.
- Joe Biden’s political corruption exposed in the Ukraine is irreversible and focuses unwelcome attention on the political corruption of the Clintons, the Pelosis, the Kerrys, and the Obamas.
- The single most successful humanitarian hoax and galvanizing political issue of our time is climate change.
So what does astute multi-billionaire globalist Michael Bloomberg do? He announces himself the climate candidate of the 2020 presidential election. In a November 26, 2019 article, Billionaire Buys Climate Change on Google, Brian Kahn reveals how Bloomberg plans to spend $1 billion of his personal fortune to buy Google ads that will reinforce his image as the climate candidate.
It is a brilliant political move by a brilliant market analyst because anyone opposing Bloomberg is seen as opposing climate change. The advertorial message is that Bloomberg will deliver the world from the catastrophic threat of climate change, so a vote for Bloomberg is a vote to save the planet.
Bloomberg is betting that the galvanizing message of climate change is powerful enough to overcome any anti-Semitic objections to his candidacy.
Let’s examine what it means in real terms, in real life, to the lives of real voters if this self-described climate candidate wins in 2020.
We begin by debunking the foundational premise of Bloomberg’s political ads: Climate change is the greatest challenge and threat to life in the 21st century.
I have written three articles on the humanitarian hoax of climate change:
The first, The Humanitarian Hoax of Climate Change, introduces the purpose of the con:
The Humanitarian Hoax of climate change is the whopper of the 21st century. It is a deliberate political scheme to transfer the wealth of industrialized nations (particularly the U.S.) to non-industrialized nations. It is globalized socialism where the assets of productive nations are transferred to non-productive nations. WHY?
The answer is found in understanding the nature of the hoax which has two parts. First, it is necessary to focus attention on the fabricated specter of catastrophic climate occurrences that will devastate the planet to deflect attention away from the actual threats to America from a nuclear Iran, the spread of Islamic terrorism, and the economic instability of a an unsustainable trade deficit.
Second, Obama’s long term plan of an internationalized globalized world requires the de-industrialization of America. His crippling energy restrictions were designed to weaken America’s defenses by destroying America’s energy industry, making us more dependent on foreign energy, and increasing our trade deficit to unsustainable levels. Obama actively supported the punitive anti-American Paris Climate Agreement deceitfully presented as the premier humanitarian effort to save the planet from catastrophic climate change. Obama disguised his crippling rules and regulations to destroy U.S. energy as altruism and a humanitarian concern for the planet.
In a laughable outburst Big Footprint former Vice President Al Gore attacked President Donald Trump accusing him of “tearing down America’s standing in the world” by withdrawing from the Paris climate accord. Only in the eyes of a deceitful globalist can withdrawing from an anti-American agreement be considered destructive. Gore actually said with a straight face on NBC’s Today Show, “The climate crisis is by far the most serious challenge we face.” Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth” is in fact a very “Convenient Lie.”
The second article, The Riddle of Climate Change, exposes the marketing of the convenient political lie:
More doomsday fear mongering is featured in a Breitbart article discussing David Wallace-Wells’ new book The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming that predicts there will be 100 million climate refugees by 2050. SERIOUSLY? Wallace-Wells defends his cataclysmic predictions saying that he worked from the worst warming scenario presented by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
A stunning Forbes article published 2.5.13 titled, In Their Own Words: Climate Alarmists Debunk Their “Science” quotes Kevin Trenberth, a lead author of 2001 and 2007 IPCC report chapters, who admits, ‘None of the models used by the IPCC are initialized to the observed state and none of the climate states in the models correspond even remotely to the current observed state.’
The same Forbes article quotes former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev who “emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance Marxist objectives saying, ‘The threat of environmental crisis will be the international key to unlock the New World Order.'” Gorbachev was referring, of course, to the globalist New World Order of an internationalized world community administered under the auspices of the United Nations.
My third article, The Humanitarian Hoax of Climate Change II – Debunking the Bunk, reviews the material and explains the efficacy of the lie of manmade climate change:
The climate changes, but “manmade” climate change is the deliberately misleading narrative that human behavior is causing cataclysmic changes to the Earth’s climate. The Climategate scandal exposed the fraudulent “research” that supported its politically motivated claims and exposed the hoax.
The United Nations IPCC goals are unapologetically stated in United Nations Agenda 2030 – the manifesto for imposing the new world order of one world government. The 17 Sustainable Development Goals reaffirm the United Nations globalist stance that planet Earth and its ecosystems are “our common home and that ‘Mother Earth’ is a common expression in a number of countries and regions.” This is all Orwellian doublespeak to rationalize imposition of a New World Order of one world government under the auspices of the corrupt United Nations.
This article includes testimony by Greenpeace apostate Patrick Moore exposing the lie of “settled science.” He explains how environmental science has been completely co-opted by political science. There is not a shred of credible evidence that manmade climate change exists – but no matter. The truth never stops a determined huckster. Moore explains:
“When they talk about the 99 percent consensus [among scientists] on climate change, that’s a completely ridiculous and false number. But most of the scientists — put it in quotes, scientists — who are pushing this catastrophic theory are getting paid by public money, they are not being paid by General Electric or Dupont or 3M to do this research, where private companies expect to get something useful from their research that might produce a better product and make them a profit in the end because people want it — build a better mousetrap type of idea.
And so you’ve got the green movement creating stories that instill fear in the public. You’ve got the media echo chamber — fake news — repeating it over and over and over again to everybody that they’re killing their children.”
Shaming is a powerful tool used and abused by humanitarian hucksters to promote their manmade climate change narrative, and to silence any opposition to their false claims of “settled” climate science.
The manmade climate change hucksters continue to perpetrate their monstrous hoax through fear and guilt. Fear is a powerful motivator for behavior change. If parents can be convinced that catastrophe will strike their children unless they change their own behavior, their guilt will motivate parents to change and the big lie of manmade climate change becomes generational.
American democracy is the single greatest existential threat to one-world government with President Donald Trump as America’s leader. The globalist elite are desperate to stop Trump because if Obama is exposed as a con man it leaves them without their primetime huckster to continue marching America toward anarchy and socialism with his “resistance” movement. The globalist elites who fund the leftist humanitarian hucksters are using them as useful idiots to facilitate climate alarmism and the great humanitarian hoax of climate change worldwide. It is a deliberate plan to create the overwhelming social chaos necessary to impose their own special brand of a New World Order.
Michael Bloomberg is a member of the globalist Trilateral Commission, the think tank founded by globalist David Rockefeller in 1973 to foster “cooperation” among nations. To fully understand the objective of a globalist one must understand the duplicitous language of a globalist. To a globalist, cooperation means cooperating in the implementation of an internationalized New World Order.
Michael Bloomberg is also a member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, another globalist think tank dedicated to the New World Order.
David Rockefeller, former chairman of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations from 1970-1985 stated unapologetically in his Memoirs:
Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as “internationalists” and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it – p.405
We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries – David Rockefeller to Trilateral Commission in 1991
Lord Bertrand Russell wrote a book titled The Impact of Science on Society in 1952 which unapologetically describes in chilling detail the intention of the few globalist elites in England and America, including the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers, to impose one-world government as the answer to the Malthusian problem of the earth’s resources being unable to sustain population growth. There is no national sovereignty, no middle class, no upward mobility, and no individual freedoms. The globalist elites envision a feudal binary socio-political system of masters and slaves where they are the ruling elite served by an enslaved population – everyone else is eliminated. “World population needs to be decreased by 50%”– Henry Kissinger.
Michael Bloomberg is a clear and present danger to American sovereignty. His philosophical positions reflect the same condescending aristocratic attitudes of Lord Bertrand Russell, David Rockefeller, and Henry Kissinger. Michael Bloomberg is the climate candidate huckster who champions bringing one-world government to America disguised as altruism. Michael Bloomberg is the candidate of one-world government and the political aristocracy who believe they are superior and entitled to be the masters of the world’s population of slaves.
Michael Bloomberg, the 2020 climate candidate, is the personification of the humanitarian hoax of climate change and the man attempting to impose globalism’s New World Order. He is the consummate humanitarian huckster presenting himself as America’s advocate when in fact he is America’s existential enemy. If Michael Bloomberg becomes the 2020 Democrat candidate, the election will be a clash of the titans that will determine the future course and structure of life on Earth.
President Donald Trump representing the American flag of freedom and national sovereignty VS. Michael Bloomberg representing the globalist flag of one-world government and a return to the feudal totalitarian New World Order ruled by the globalist political elite.
@ Edgar G.:
Thanks. Ironically, there is one area in which Bloomberg would be likely to put less or perhaps no pressure on Israel. China. Bloomberg defends China, incredibly. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1fa_k90PW0
@ Sebastien Zorn:
I didn’t know that this was your opinion also. It shows what great minds we have…according to the old saying…As for the last part of the quote, that denotes our opponents…
Edgar G. Said:
Yes. I’ve been saying that for a long time, now. He is Trump’s mirror-image opposite, including his personal backstory. Both inherited millions and turned them into billions. Both went into executive office straight from business, were elected to fix troubled economies, and succeeded by thinking outside the box. Both donated their salaries back and paid their own expenses. Both have a history of honesty and transparency in public office. Both have hired family — Bloomberg paid his daughter’s salary. Both have extensive experience manipulating media to their advantage. Both politically independent. But opposite politics and Bloomberg, though he has defended Israel, supports the Two State Solution. Israel has more to fear from “friends” in the White House. Trump is a nationalist. Bloomberg is a globalist. Though Bloomberg has a more refined and private persona, for all his attempts to appear as a man of the people. . They are truly doppelgangers.
Bloomberg will be Trumps most formidable opponent…if he’s the Dem Candidate. His record is far, far better than those of any of the Dems,,,….
I worked at the Council of Foreign Relations about 10 or 15 years ago. Scary place. They made us climb up to this narrow balcony which didn’t give enough room to play. I remember smashing the scroll of my viola against the wall, accidentally. Several weddings. String quartets, you know, you know, like combat duty and they made us use the servant’s entrance.
I was also a lobbyist in some high powered places. We played Christmas/Chanukkha music in lobbies in December.
Wedding Musicians of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your strings
@ Felix Quigley:
I personally, cannot clarify my assertions further, but……if I looked them up on the internet I could, as it is all there in black and white. It is the research results of a multitude of scientists over the past 100 years or so, and all has become common knowledge.
My remarks about the cold winters in Dublin when I was a child, were actually truncated for brevity. The canal freezings were as a child, and the ice in my water glass were up to when I was about 18-20 or so. Therefore the period must have lasted much longer than I first estimated.
Edgar
Definitely good points and this is exactly what climate science covers
But we must find out what man now knows about this past, most of it when there was no man to record it, and we must locate the sources of this knowledge, and evaluate these sources in an objective way.
As Mayhoe says that is what they the climat scientists spend a lot of their time on.
A personal note…Ziff records IN GREAT DETAIL that the Jews were at the very forefront of all knowledge in our world.
This is why I maintain that do not listen to skeptics, do not listen to the opposite either, but let us get to the knowledge.
because that is what Ziff, who I trust totally, maintains the Jews were about, as they fought valiantly against Hadrian, and for all centuries since as well, but sadly there IS a degeneration.
By the way that degeneration is not surprising to me because I believe the Holocaust has cast a major blow
I will give people time to study the Mayhoe Ted talk
@ Felix Quigley:
Yes Felix, I believe, from later reading, that it was nearing the end of what was referred to as a mini-ice age, inside a warmer period. But to me, that just shows how variable the atmosphere is, constantly altering, and although there is a more or less steady rise in temp. for the last 150 years, it’s only a blip on the bigger scale of time. Thousands of years ago it was far, far warmer, plant life was huge, and, as we constantly find out, areas which were once equatorial in temp. are now glacial…AND vice versa. Didn’t reversing poles come into it somewhere…?
Thinking of those bitterly cold years, I recall when the Luftwaffe dropped bombs on Dublin, one just across the road from my house , about 20-30 paces away, exactly opposite a major synagogue, blasting my bed from the inner wall right to under the window, filled with broken glass. stripped every slate from the roof, and damaged the brickwork of our house. Anyway, there was thick snow on the ground, and we all got up quickly and went out. Just outside was a very thick electric cable, seemingly torn up from the underground and severed. (Just now, thinking about it, It might have been an overhead tram cable). One end was spitting sparks and we were all warned to keep away from it. We were actually stepping over it , not realising the danger.
Edgar
This is basically your position on the global warming concept and has not changed.
“I believe that to think puny man could alter the climate when the really important reasons are the earth’s wobble, more acute than other times, the sun spots, the oceans, volcanic action, and much more, ALL have their effect, which are the rea cause of climate, any kind of climate.”
In the course of the video made at Texas Tech University https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtrYNGs9oRM
Catherine Hayhoe makes a very important observation. Most of the time of climate scientists has been spent in the study of these past epochs.
She does not quantify it. She just says much, meaning the majority. i am not a scientist but in reading the literature it may be in 90s per cent.
I find that they know the history of our earth very well.
I am not a scientsit so I cannot vouch for every detail. But I believe int hemethod of science. I believe in the peer reviewed system.
So now i find that your assertions re
earth’s wobble
earths wobble more acute than other times
the sun spots
the oceans
volcanic action
and much more…
NEED TO BE MADE MORE PRECISE BY YOU SINCE YOU ADVANCE THEM INT HE FIRST PLACE
Back to Hayhoe. i think in the video she is saying that scientists have looked very closely at all of these and have ruled them out.
{I mean of course ruled them out as the cause of the increase in temperature of the earth over the past 100 to 200 years}
Edgar
You refer to a period of some years when it was very cold in Dublin. i am not dismissing memories or sensual experience either. it is rather the local geographical and time factor i am disputing.
Luckily in a Tedx talk Katherine Hayhoe has answered this very well. in the course of this video she shows a graph of some short years like your experience. then she places this inside the larger graph of a 100 years or so. if you watch this video and reflect on this part it is quite startling the answer she gives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtrYNGs9oRM
if you look at the graph of the small number of years the temperature of the earth seems to be decreasing. If you take the graph of the 100 years it is very different. The temperature rises.
But it is a question of horrific implications. if the graph of 100 years shows a relentless rise int he temperature of earth, why would somebody extract and make another distinct graph covering a handful of year?
I know Edgar you are a very fair and principled person.
To me that is the same low level of deceit that we are used to in the camp of BDS and Momentum.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
This is a truly horrible situation which is glossed over,and even alughed at, by Sebastien Zorn
The great body of science and scientists are definitely not into this antisemitism.
The example here is AOC. She does see the danger of global warming of the earth. I think she is right in this.
At the same time,and not related to it, she is an antisemite.
Just remember please that the little molecules of CO2 in our atmosphere are not interested in antisemitism.
This is the horror of the situation. That Zorn uses such horror things to confuse about those molecules of CO2 which should be only an issue for science.
@ Sebastien Zorn:
Truer words were never spoken Sebastien. You always hit on the tiny, often obscured real focal point.
By the way, “Science Fiction fans”, reminded me of something. Perhaps you’ve heard of “The Cryonics Institute”, in Clinton Township, near Detroit Michegan. ( I signed up many years ago) The founder was a guy named Robert Ettinger, a physicist or biologist, maybe both. He was an avid Science Fiction reader, like myself, and got his idea about cryonics from reading a story by Neil R Jones, a favourite author of mine. The main character was a Professor Jameson who, before he died, arranged to have his body shot off into space in a capsule. It became a frozen, tiny earth satellite for a million years, and was found by a race of intelligent metal people, who transferred his brain into one of their own similar forms, so became immortal.. I actually HAVE that story, and read it several times as a kid..
I casually picked up Ettinger’s book in the early 1960s “The Prospect of Immortality”.We corresponded for many years, and also with Mae Junod his sec. later his second wife,. I have a load of their letters around somewhere.
Just idly thinking of it, reminded by my mentioning science fiction in the post above.. So please excuse the chatter.
@ linda goudsmit:
another awesome article Linda I do enjoy your common sense work
@ Edgar G.:
Isn’t it ironic that the chief Bete Noir of the radical environmentalists internationally, like America’s “Squad,” is the one country that takes this nonsense seriously and is actually doing something about it in a practical way.
@ Adam Dalgliesh:
Brilliant….Only in Israel….. Down the road, in the distant future, I can see those bacteria metamorphosing into larger structures, and actually competing with photosynthetically driven plant and tree life, to the detriment of our forests and green leaf foliage. So then the scientific world will have to come up with some gimmick which will cause abatement of the bacteria’s appetites…..(like Noach’s Flood)..
That’s as far as I’ve got Science Fiction enthusiasts, take it on from there……!!
From Today’s Jewish Press.
The climate change deniers have totally ignored the fact that the widespread belief in climate change on the part of both climate scientists and the general public has been a great talking point for numerous innovative Israeli start-up industries that could bring huge profits to Israel. On the other hand, I don’t see how climate change denial does anything to help Israel.
@ greenrobot:
Do you call “factual” …impolite…or have you discovered the “7 Cities of Cibola”…..or is it Ponce De Leon’s “Fountain of Youth”….? I myself am an older person, and am practical enough to know that my senses are not exactly as they were 50 years ago.
However, if I hurt your feelings, I apologise
Besides, I remember winters in Ireland which T.G. have not yet occurred in these days -so far. I slept always with a window open, and there were winters when the glass of water by my bedside would have a skim of ice on it in the morning. The nearby canal, perhaps 75 ft. wide, could be crossed over the ice…on foot, safely… This was just about every winter for perhaps 6-7 years or more, that I recall well.
So don’t tell me about “climate change”… Go and commune with that pie-faced little fraud, the Swedish actress, who fooled people -for a moment- with her scripted UN scenario..
I wasn’t either “illustrating” ( I know what you mean) or “arguing”….(it wasn’t an argument) Merely stating scientific, WELL proven facts….. So why should your amour propre be stung., although you are entitled to your opinion, just as I am….
P.S. Are you both Green Robot and Frank Adam…….Hmm.!!
@ Edgar G.: The first part of you remark is impolite and does not illustrate your argument.
@ linda goudsmit: Thanks Linda.
@ Frank Adam:
“Seeing and feeling” change, at 78,,,,,do you not think that your greater age, when your skin and nerve endings are more sensitive, and your perceptions more dulled, and forgetful, might have something to do with it.
I believe that to think puny man could alter the climate when the really important reasons are the earth’s wobble, more acute than other times, the sun spots, the oceans, volcanic action, and much more, ALL have their effect, which are the rea cause of climate, any kind of climate.
@ Frank Adam:
The heavier rains and storms are a consequence of the earth’s naturally fluctuating climate. The big lie about climate is that climate changes are MANMADE – they aren’t. It is political science not atmospheric science.
I do not know enough about Bloomberg in US politics BUT those rubbishing the climate problem will regret it. Even here in NW England NW Europe old fogeys like myself at 78 can see and feel that the strength of heavy rain and storms is a lot stronger than in our young decades, or even thirty years ago.
More important US isolationism and its, “Plague on both your houses!” as regards Europe etc ignores that capitalism is as globalist as communism in its intentions and effects – though one is open ended and the other is an over organised closed rigid system.
In the 20th century supporting globalist free trade suited US commercial and political power in general as with Britain in the 19th century. As it bites back when Germany and the US caught up, both the UK with “tariff reform” and now the US objecting to China back pedal(led) from the global free for all. In the 20’s and 30’s excessive protectionism of the fragmented Europe of the broken Tsarist, German Habsburg and Ottoman Empires contributed greatly to the run in to WW II. Let us hope the current situation will be more cautiously managed.