Mostly true…
https://www.truthorfiction.com/clinton-watergate/
Hillary Clinton Ex-Boss Says He Fired Her from Her Work on the Watergate Investigation for Being a “Liar” and “Unethical”-Truth! & Fiction!
Summary of eRumor:
As a 27-year-old working on the Watergate investigation in the 1970s, Hillary Rodham Clinton was “fired” from her position for being a “liar” and “unethical”.
The Truth:
It’s true that Hillary Clinton’s ex-boss has accused her of being a “liar” and “unethical” during the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry into Watergate, but claims that she was fired for those reasons are false.
Claims that Hillary Clinton had been fired from the impeachment inquiry first went viral during her 2008 presidential bid. A column written by Dan Calabrese, the founder of Northstar Writers Group, appeared in countless forwarded emails, and the eRumor was born.
The column was inspired by statements made by Jerry Zeifman, a Democrat who served as counsel and chief of staff for the House Judiciary Committee during the Watergate investigation. Zeifman’s book, “Hillary’s Pursuit of Power,” and comments that he made on his website, which is no longer active, have been critical of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s actions during the Watergate investigation, and in the years that followed.
Jerry Zeifman said he supervised Hillary Rodham Clinton as she worked on the team that worked on the Watergate impeachment inquiry, and that during the investigation Hillary Clinton had “…engaged in a variety of self-serving, unethical practices in violation of House rules.”
Specifically, Jerry Zeifman said Hillary Rodham Clinton and others wanted Richard Nixon to remain in office so Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy would have a better chance of being elected president. Zeifman said a young lawyer who shared an office with Clinton came to him in August of 1974 to apologize that he and Clinton had lied to him. The lawyer, John Labovitz, is quoted as saying that he was dismayed with “…her erroneous legal opinions and efforts to deny Nixon representation by counsel — as well as an unwillingness to investigate Nixon.”
Jerry Zeifman also said that Hillary Rodham Clinton regularly consulted with Ted Kennedy’s chief political strategist, which was a violation of House rules. Zeifman said in addition to helping Ted Kennedy win the presidency, Democrats also didn’t want Nixon to face an impeachment trial because they feared he might bring up abuses of office by President John Kennedy as part of his defense.
But while Jerry Zeifman has been consistent in his criticism of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s work on the Watergate investigation, circumstances surrounding her termination are less clear. In a 1999 interview with the Scripps Howard News Service, Zeifman said he didn’t have the power to fire Clinton, or else he would have:
“Zeifman does not have flattering memories of Rodham’s work on the committee. ‘If I had the power to fire her, I would have fired her,’ he said.
Zeifman said Rodham sparked a bitter battle among Democrats by recommending the Judiciary Committee deny Nixon’s lawyers the right to attend the closed-door meetings.
‘Can you imagine that? This was a committee of lawyers and members of the bar, and she was saying the committee should deny the president representation,’ he said.
After a lengthy behind-the-scenes debate, Zeifman said the committee decided Nixon’s lawyers could attend.”
In an interview on the Neal Boortz Show in 2008, Jerry Zeifman altered his claim about Hillary’s termination from the Watergate investigation:
“Well, let me put it this way: I terminated her, along with some other staff members who were — were no longer needed, and advised her that I would not — could not — recommend her for any further positions.”
When pressed, Zeifman said he couldn’t recommend Hillary Rodham Clinton for future positions, “Because of her unethical conduct.” Despite that, however, Clinton was terminated because she was “no longer needed” — not because she had lied, according to Zeifman’s own account.
But in a 2008 column Zeifman wrote, “My own reaction was of regret, when I terminated her employment on the Nixon impeachment staff, I had not reported her unethical practices to the appropriate bar associations.”
In 2008, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign replied to Zeifman’s claims directly by saying, “In a column circulating on the Internet Jerry Zeifman alleges that Hillary was fired from her job on the House Judiciary Committee in the 1970s. This is false. Hillary was not fired.” That website has since been taken offline.
@ yamit82:
Yes, I heard that also, couldn’t remember his name, but he was an absolutely disgusting ” brown nose”.
Watch this disgusting show and especially the Jew on the committee Jerry Nadler POS KIKIE
http://www.c-span.org/video/?412357-1/attorney-general-loretta-lynch-testifies-capitol-hill&live
@ yamit82:
Ain’t gonna happen,
@ yamit82:
You have a good point.
@ yamit82:
When have you ever any where given any credit to Paul.
@ bernard ross:
http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/05/01/one-year-silence-hillary-clinton-uranium-deal/
http://www.breitbart.com/hillary-clinton/2016/05/01/one-year-silence-hillary-clinton-uranium-deal/
This deal alone should have put her in an orange jump suit
@ honeybee:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0wYL5-VqBU
bernard ross Said:
Sort of disagree…..I concede that Islam is a threat an abomination but they would be impotent ineffective and powerless without the support, aid and even comfort granted to them by the elites and corporate interests in the West. These are the same interests that built Hitlers war machine deep into WW2 until they had to cover their tracks and involvement rather than be prosecuted for war crimes. Maybe some of the players have changed but there are many who have taken their place and this includes CIA and other security institutions…. Islam could never have made such deep and rapid inroads against Western civilization without such help and direction…. Something was needed to replace the feared Red Menace after the fall of the USSR and Islam guarantees generational conflict as they are not based in any single nation state but more than 50 and growing financed by ME oil…. Certainly it’s absurd to think that most terrorist groups cannot be defeated and quite easily by America and say Nato if there were a real desire to confront them head on but they don’t want to defeat them much like Israel does not want to defeat Hamas and the PLO.
Radical Islam is needed as a Bug Bear by ruling elites keeps Mil Industrial complex churning out weapons and Industrial and political elites happy and in the money.
@ yamit82:
Thank you.
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Psalms-14-1/
@ honeybee:
Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya, stressed:
@ lsatenstein:
@ bernard ross:
I wish I knew.
honeybee Said:
I keep wondering why no one has speculated that Hillary was a willing spy for money. The facts are such that the idea deserves investigation. Here is a scenario for folks to consider:
Hillary took on huma as her handler in order to secure the “donations” of tens of millions from the gulf arabs and muslim orgs. Huma’s parents are high up MB and she was connected to a terror org. Perhaps Huma is there to see that Hillary follows the script and makes their investment worthwhile. Certainly there is enough circumstantial evidence to suggest she may be an intentional willing spy. I have no doubt that foreign intelligence agencies have so many blackmail files on Hillary that we will be run by foreigners for her entire term, and even beyond due to her appointments.
It is unbelievable to me that americans cant see the obvious. Islam is the greatest danger to the west, democracy and world peace and we have a muslim president named hussein who got the FBI and CIA to stop profiling muslims AND our next president has as her most trusted aide a muslim highly connected with terror orgs….. DUH???????????????????????>/
@ bernard ross:
Good post Thank you. My Grandfather’s family, in Poland, was exterminated completely..
yamit82 Said:
with an evil devious lesbian shrew like hillary it is no surprise that he looked everywhere else, all the time. It was obviously a marriage of “convenience” similar to obama and michelle who were put together by Wright who matched up “down low” black upwardly mobile feygeles with black women.
honeybee Said:
no, not ruined… to be expected from clueless fools who lived a sheltered life. While his grandma was comfortably waxing poetic about roosevelt who sent jewish children back to ovens my grandparents were walking my father and uncle across the western border of germany into holland, giving them to relatives who put them on the Kindertransport ship to britain. My grandparents started in the eastern poland pale, moved to the very liberal germany and were prescient enough to live in the west where the border was more porous. Only one relative remaining in poland of 8 siblings of my grandfather survived. They got out their kids and then hid in belgium and survived the war. American liberal jews make me sick… I remember when they were shocked that the blacks turned on them with a wave of anti semitism in the 60’s which is still prevalent among many american blacks today. As a collective american jews strike me the same as those foolish german jews who had not a clue as to the fate ahead of them. They thought that because Germany was so liberal that they were suddenly free to say and do anything. In my view the Jewish relationship to the left and the democrats will bring a wave of anti semitism because the Jews will be seen as facilitators of the greatest existential danger to america which is the leftist muslim alliance….. which is also the greatest danger to world and american jewry. I and other Jews will suffer due to the libelous loose talk of those liberal american jewish liars. Trump is neither a bigot nor an anti semite and those Jews trying to paint him as such will be seen as leftist muslim facilitators. They are probably out now supporting black lives matter. American jews think too much about “principles” because they have not had to think as Jews about survival.
@ yamit82:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/l/leonardoda383004.html?src=t_men
yamit82 Said:
I know I am the exception to the rule.
yamit82 Said:
Yes women are stupid! They marry for love and burden themselves with a man child for life.
yamit82 Said:
Yes , men can go out for dinner, but men a cheapskates and would rather not spend the money.
@ honeybee:
Beauty fades?
Does for many women but not all.
Intellignce?
Most women are stupid to begin with 😛
Cooking??/ Plenty of restaurants and take out who needs live in cook? 🙂
@ lsatenstein:
@ bernard ross:
@ yamit82:
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/did-hillary-reveal-ultra-secrets?f=must_reads
@ lsatenstein:
@ yamit82:
@ bernard ross:
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Job-28-28/
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Job-28-28/
yamit82 Said:
” A Big woman: Warmth in the Winter, shade in the Summer” Texas saying
@ yamit82:
” Beauty fades, intelligence last and so does cooking ” dicha of Deborah
lsatenstein Said:
I can understand why Bill looked elsewhere for his sex and brains….. Hitlery is a known lesbian and she is really stupid because she keeps getting caught. Her brains seem to be that she knows how to avoid paying the penalty for her long criminal history….. That only leaves sex and she is a fat old ugly POS and always has been except once she was not so fat the rest stands.
I have noticed that so far you have refrained from saying why you support her and what you think are her positive attributes…. Be very interested to hear your views on those questions.
@ bernard ross:
I shall ruin your morning:
http://forward.com/opinion/344457/how-republicans-tried-to-flip-the-jewish-vote-and-created-donald-trump/?utm_content=daily_Newsletter_MainList_Title_Position-1&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=New%20Daily%202016-07-11&utm_term=The%20Forward%20Today%20Monday-Friday
lsatenstein Said:
Hahahahahahahahaha,
@ lsatenstein:
the real question here is why you support and defend that most corrupt creature Hillary?
lsatenstein Said:
donald trump was not a politician, he did not collect a salary from my tax money like everyone including hillary did. He was a businessman following the rules made by hillary bernie and Ryan… his duty was to make a profit and pay his lenders and investors. He owed me nothing and those who sued him had their chance to convince a court that he owed them something, unlike the protected crook. Hillary is a criminal and possibly even a spy for money, she came to politics with nothing and leaves with over a 100 million. Hillary collected my salary and stole from me all her life.
lsatenstein Said:
the best that can happen to america is to elect the “exagerator” Donald trump…. and I hope he “exaggerates” the punishments to that cabal of traitorous criminals running the nation. I am reminded of Pinochet for inspiration. It appears that I always have to arrive to correct your ludicrous intentional lies… not exaggerations.
@ lsatenstein:
This article was about the crimes of Hillary. Trying to change the subject will not work. Hillary is clearly the most evil and corrupt politician in American history.
@ lsatenstein: A Hillary fanatic cannot tolerate the truth. Normally I would oppose Trump. However with evil Hillary trying to steal the presidency I have no choice in this election. I will hold my nose and vote for Trump.
You can quote me “Donald Trump” never lied or cheated in his life. His three marriages and 3000+ law suites, most of which were to avoid paying contractors were valid. These nasty honest business men did not deserve to get any payments.
And his former wives were guilty of being married to the wrong man, a man who married for brains, and not for sex.
Every known politician stretches the truth for their own benefit.
The best that can happen to the USA is to not elect Donald exaggerator Trump